Dynadot
Spaceship
Watch
Impact
133
It seems .PRO is slowly coming out of the cage with cheaper reg prices than they were a year ago and major registrars like netsol taking notice of the extension and promoting it. B-)

Here are some that I picked up in last couple of days:

Alexandria.pro

Anchorage.pro

Arlington.pro

Belfast.pro

Birmingham.pro

Budapest.pro

Durham.pro

Fairfax.pro

Italian.pro

Lisbon.pro

Fire away with your regs after the relaunch on September 8th, 2008.
 
3
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
In light of recent .pro sales and the fact that the registry has just been bought. I find it really hard to think .pro is going anywhere but up!

I'm predicting a 6 month news gap to weed out the week hands until the marketing cycle heats back up with Afilias at the helm.

don't sell!
 
3
•••
Hey man, domains aside, if you need help we as a community are here for you. Sometimes the thick curtains are drawn and everything looks dark, but it's actually bright outside. This is coming from someone that's dealt with curtains in the past. I do wish well on you.
 
4
•••
Reporting a sale

Reporting a sale

I sold telephone.pro for 1.5K private sale :sold:
 
4
•••
Total .pros registered for October 2011 were up for the 22nd month in a row, this month by 2.4% to 75,538, excluding the Hostway zip codes. RU Center is still the fastest growing registrar, up 4.8% in the month to 10,724, however that was the slowest month on month growth for them since they started selling .pro. Encirca is still the biggest .pro register on a round 13,500, this is about 2,000 .pros ahead of both Network Solutions and OVH.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
4
•••
Dot Pro's biggest problem atm is SEO as I see it.
That is an urban legend, dot pro works for SEO exactly as any other gTLD (com, net, org, biz, travel, etc) or ccgTLD (cc, tv, ws, etc).
 
4
•••
debt.pro Outbid! $1,150.00 Ended

nice price.
fwiw, looks like one bidder trying to grab everything.

///

update:
dating.pro Outbid! 36 $1,750.00 Ended

///


finals:

diet.pro $4,000.00 Ended
credit.pro $2,400.00 Ended
dating.pro $1,750.00 Ended
debt.pro $1,150.00 Ended
sales.pro $679.00 Ended
taxes.pro $629.00 Ended
 
Last edited:
4
•••
The buyers of Go.pro and Tech.pro spent $40,000 and $25,500

These 1 word generics would get a quote of $250k - $1million over on domainnamesales dot com

Those quotes would of course be for this year. Next Year I will expect quotes to double on premium 1 word generics.

Top quality .COM barely sell for that price range, never mind .PRO.

Selling a name like smile.pro for $2200 is at this point a very low price and not a good sale. It’s missing a 2 and is worth $22,200 this year.

The reality is $2200 is more than fair for that domain. It is not like end users are lining up to pay premium prices for .PRO.

You are overly optimistic about .PRO.

The truth is that it ranks way below the Big 3 (COM/NET/ORG), respected ccTLD, and even secondary gTLD like .INFO and .BIZ when it comes to registrations, usage, awareness, and sales.

Brad
 
4
•••
Look at .me which is the best example of what it was and what it become. Domain hacks are another example with the recent xx,xxx sales and the 100k sale.
.me has found a limited but working niche, with active promotion by the registry and the registrars, and no restrictions. And unlike .pro it's carried by all mainstream registrars.
Problem with .pro is lack of visible promotion, and not being carried by the large registrars.
But imo the biggest issue is lack of identity, .pro essentially competing against .com (just like .biz that has no raison d'être either).
 
4
•••
I think the registry would prefer for you to just wonder and marvel at the extension and forget about asking intelligent questions.
Could you please articulate a few of these intelligent questions?

In my opinion, it is now time to do a mass purge and remove these TLDs from your accounts. I see a great drop trend on the horizon. IMHO
Right, just like people should do in all extensions except for .com?

I would not consider this a positive indicator as it suggests a loss of demand.
You do realise than .coms went from $50/yr to $6/yr? Registrations went up 100 fold. Why do you think it will be different for .pro?

When demand drops so does price. A good example would be the cost of dial-up networking. As the demand reached zero, so did the price.
I personally think of .pro like 4G, not everyone gets it, yet, but that's fine.

To make money in business you have to be ahead of the curve, not picking up crap in .com as most of the followers seem to be doing.

If you can get any of the keywords in .com that you can in .pro, you'd be looking at six figures, at the very least.

And therein lies the opportunity.

What you are seeing with .PRO is the final stages before the entire collapse of reseller market value. As I have previously stated, this is probably one of the worst investments on the face of the Earth.
I also own .gd domains, if .pro is the worst... wonder what you'll say about that?

The expedited development of a comprehensive exit strategy would be something that anyone reading this might consider. IMHO
They might consider building a cave home in a mountain to try and survive the upcoming end of the world on 21/12/2012 but most sane people don't.

It is difficult perhaps to see, but from my side of the fence, things are looking awfully bleak for .PRO.
What is your side of the fence? .Com leftover land? I really hope you get something from Verisign for all your trashing of most extensions, specially with a 1000 more coming out soon, would be a terrible waste of time otherwise.

There are extremely few good domain investments at this time. Most all domains are bad investments currently.
I agree with this completely.

Especially non-.COMs.
Actually it's the other way around, most of the crap is in .com, just because the numbers are that much higher - 100 million domains, you can be sure less than 1% are worth five figures or more and most of those were registered before 1996.

The internet is both expanding and contracting simultaneously. Internet traffic is increasing as independent development is declining. There is a consolidation underway with things moving to NetFlix, YouTube, and Facebook like sites.
The internet is not contracting at all. I think you should fire the person who supplies you with stats, they're probably high on your supply too.

Guess we should inform all the startups they shouldn't bother since the Internet is focussing only on the 3 sites you're mentioned.

Just fyi, I've never even visited netflix, just like a majority of the non-US based Internet user base, which might surprise you to learn is actually many multiples of those in the US.

There is no reason for .PRO and now that the registry has "sold out" in terms of its commitment to the integrity and professionalism of the brand, it's clearly "Game Over" for this lowly TLD. IMHO.
Lmao, right, keep telling yourself that and stick to pumping also ran .coms that you couldn't get reg fee for, we'll stick to the domains that make us money, irrespective of the extension.

I've made money in .tv, .co and even .ag, guess I shouldn't have bothered since they're not worth anything in the 'real' world where people only buy crappy .coms, right?

And though I haven't made major profits in .pro it's mostly because I've priced myself out of the current reseller market for the most part.

Even table.pro is worth, imho, at least 5x of what I'm selling it for and I'm sure the buyer will prove me right, pretty soon.

I think people like you are actually good for domain investors with vision, means less competition.
 
4
•••
Thought this might be worth posting so we can actually see that what others are doing.

The search term is "mountain bike holidays "
45 mil + results
mountain bike holidays - Google Search.png
 
4
•••
Excluding 43,493 zip code .pros, total .pros registered in December 2011 rose by 5.9%, from 77,117 to 81,681. This was the biggest month on month rise since January 2009 and the 25th consecutive monthly rise.

I own London.pro and plan to keep it. Paris.pro sold for $2,888 and Moscow.pro sold for $470.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
Lille

On Sedo at now… :wave:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lille
fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lille
 
4
•••
Now the big question is if .pro meets the criteria of being a viable alternative: this is what we are debating here.
Bingo :tu:
The problem is that few end users know .pro even exists. Other extensions are facing the same problem.
.pro is not carried by the main registrars. Perhaps the registrars are not interested due to the limited demand (offering an extension involves costs) so it could be a chicken and egg situation too.

How many of you use a .pro for one your business ventures ?
I mean, not some MFA site that is on autopilot.
Domainers like to pimp their investments but are not often seen taking their own medicine.
 
4
•••
@mwzd

Let them post mate, i like to see how people with no intention or interest in this extension want to show their knowledge and stop us sinners from making mistakes. They still don't get it that we don't get it, if you get it.

Don't lump me into that group.
I couldn't care less how other people spend their money. If you're on the "buy and hope" domainer failboat, .pro is steerage.

If you're making money with .pro, fine. I bet its not nearly as much as others are making with .com, but a profit's a profit and that's all that matters.

What I'm chuckling at is the stupid narrative that compares the efficacy of .pro in terms of its marketing gravitas on the basis of one tenth of one percent of .pro's are in Alexa 1mm relative to how .1% of .com represents itself in that same measure.

It's like saying that the window boxes and rooftop gardens in the 0.2 square miles that make up the entirety of the Vatican City proportionally represents relevant agriculture space greater than the 3,790,000.00 square miles comprising all 50 US States.

It's just stupid when you try to cobble up a statistical commonality between two utterly different things.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Anyone transferred their .pro domains to haxonet? Share your experience.
I have some .pro domains at Hexonet and I can say that it works fine. :gl:

EnCirca is the only registrar I have ever used that does not have the ability to allow you to download a list of your portfolio. Last year they told me "they were working on it."
Encirca does not know how to retain its best customers.
 
4
•••
I'm going to disagree with this, a good domain has inherent value, even in outlying extensions. Try and find "insurance" or "casino" or "poker" in any of the 300 or so extensions active today.
As for the casino.tld or poker.tld sales, almost all are still parked, inactive, unresolving, undeveloped. A few are affiliates redirects but there is almost none that is developed properly. That should come as no surprise.
Why would any self-respecting gambling company want to brand around .tk, .io or the obscure extension of a remote territory that is inhabited by penguins ?
Seriously ? The best you should expect is a crappy MFA site, with very few exceptions.

But as long as domainers are buying, it could be argued that there is a market for those domains. A market of suckers (looking for another bigger sucker ?).

This is a complete BS argument, one could ask the same of undeveloped .coms and come away with a similar answer.
It isn't a BS argument.

The share of domainer ownership should certainly be taken into account. Because a disproportionate amount of speculation can actually be detrimental to the development of an extension. In general domainers do little to enhance an extension, they resell, they park, they do some light development (sometimes) but they do not contribute like normal end users.
End users (and consumers) will shun any alt extension that they perceive to be 'squatted' and lacking bona fide development.

Speculation works when the extension has already been embraced by end users, but when speculation takes a foothold early on, it has a repellent effect.

Any interest in .eu has been killed by the excessive speculation and gaming of the sunrise TM system. Same thing had happened with .info years earlier, .biz to some extent. Few domainers remember of have done research - back then confidence in new TLDs was badly shaken because of the opportunists gaming the system. Little has changed since then.

The bottom line is that the figures alone don't tell the whole story, but they can reveal troubling trends as I've seen with .co & .xxx.
 
4
•••
"The .PRO domain continues to rise in popularity as licensed professionals looking to brand themselves online are securing their preferred names at an amazing rate"

a·maz·ing/əˈmāziNG/
Adjective:
1. Causing great surprise or wonder; astonishing.
2. Startlingly impressive.

Seriously! How many different types of licensed professionals are going to secure their preferred name?


"and their interest in the .com domain is in a steady decline because their preferred names are rarely available in .com."

OOOOOOk. Most of these folks are going to go with an alternative .com once they find out their "preferred name" has already been registered in .pro.


Anyway, if you're just starting out I'd avoid "investing" in this extension. I've managed to profit well, but I know that is very rare.
 
4
•••
4
•••
4
•••
I'd rather buy properties.co.nz than the .pro
That sale was probably to an end user from New Zeland.
Properties is a geo target keyword which suits mostly with ccTLD
IMO I don't think it fits with .pro

Never been a big fan of .co, I would buy the argument more if it was just .nz

properties.nz - ok! good!
properties.co.nz - really?
properties.pro - ok! good!

Properties.co.nz is worth far more than Properties.pro to an end user. Why?

1.) .CO.NZ is heavily used and preferred by end users in at least one place. .PRO is not the preferred extension or heavily used anywhere.

2.) There are far more buyers for quality .CO.NZ than .PRO. In New Zealand .CO.NZ is the most popular extension by far.

3.) For a term like properties it makes way more sense in a ccTLD than a .PRO.

Brad
 
3
•••
RealEstate.pro $14K
2010 Moniker/SnapNames
 
4
•••
4
•••
4
•••
.PW vs. .PRO

Sure, .pw can be repurposed for "Professional Web," but which of the following domains are more likely to resonate with consumers and end users when viewed in print ads, tv commercials, billboards, business cards and search engine results?

Voicemail.pw
Voicemail.pro

SportingGoods.pw
SportingGoods.pro

HomeTheater.pw
HomeTheater.pro

HealthInsurance.pw
HealthInsurance.pro

Movie.pw
Movie.pro

Going.pw
Going.pro
When browsing through the app stores from Apple or Android, you'll see the word, "pro" used in the app title more consistently than any other descriptive keyword or modifier. There's a reason for that. Think about it: long before Al Gore invented the Internet, "pro" was widely used, both as prefix and suffix, to describe a multitude of different products, services and business entities.

PRO = Professional = Credibility

The word "pro" is both familiar and intuitive. And it's been a part of our business nomenclature for generations. Think of the word "pro" as SEO for the brain! Can you say that about .pw?

In the meantime, while global business interests and domain speculators are tripping over themselves and literally spending hundreds of millions of dollars in application fees, alone, for a shot at bringing 1,900 new domain extensions to market -- with no guarantees of ICANN approval or ultimate success, dotPro is approved, in place and ready to roll. Simply follow the dollars. If speculators and investors are betting that kind of hard money on success for a yet untested, untried new crop of domain extensions slowly making their way to market, maybe, just maybe there's room for one more domain extension that embodies that familiar, descriptive, legacy keyword of business and commerce: "PRO."
 
Last edited:
4
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back