- Impact
- 5,069
Guess who bought Tickets.mobi!!? Straight from the 'king' himself!
RicksBlog
Time for naysayer 'reassess'??!?
RicksBlog
Time for naysayer 'reassess'??!?
The only place/reason to see premium names held by domainers, is to look for early portfolio and reg purchasing threads. As I, and I'm assure others, don't believe Premium domains would sell here currently for their value, so what is the reason to post them otherwise. Most of the names that get posted are late buys or, those selling later buys. A few nice ones can be seen in a couple sigs, but overall not in postings. And even though mtld held back 5K names, believe me, there are some portfolios out there that are a domainers dream 'in any extension'.sdsinc said:I've not seen a lot of mobi here that would qualify as premium, instead lots of so-called brandable, 3-worders and other less than average that wouldn't sell in .com. Hence my feeling that domainers don't get "it".
sdsinc said:I hear ya. Clearly, bad names abound in every extension. But at least when a new extension launches you have the opportunity to pick premium keywords (aside from those hoarded by mtld of course).
I've not seen a lot of mobi here that would qualify as premium, instead lots of so-called brandable, 3-worders and other less than average that wouldn't sell in .com. Hence my feeling that domainers don't get "it".
If you read carefully you will notice that I'm not always bashing the extension just for the sake of it, instead I invite the players to cast a more critical look at their picks.
It is sad, because I would rather see a domainer prosper in an extension I dislike, than waste his money on names that will be dropped.
hawkeye said:The only place/reason to see premium names held by domainers, is to look for early portfolio and reg purchasing threads. As I, and I'm assure others, don't believe Premium domains would sell here currently for their value, so what is the reason to post them otherwise. Most of the names that get posted are late buys or, those selling later buys. A few nice ones can be seen if a couple sigs, but overall not in postings. And even though mtld held back 5K names, believe me, there are some portfolios out there that are a domainers dream 'in any extension'.
acc said:I think you are missing a BIG point - dot mobi sites are NOT LIMITED to mobile access only - yes, they are intended to GUARANTEE mobile access but they can also simultaneously include full PC size information. You can use device detection and serve BOTH mobile and non-mobile pages. Just don't use frames, tables and large graphics on the mobile pages. Common sense requirements. Newer CSS designs already do away with the need for tables anyway and frames are typically not a real good idea to use for a number of reasons.
Dot mobi domain names are VERSATILE and an individual or a business of any size can - today - still acquire great keyword .mobi names for a small fraction of the price of their dot com counterparts. Useful, reasonably priced or downright inexpensive, and targetted toward the fastest growing segment of the online world. Not the biggest yet just the fastest growing.
Both online worlds and both extensions can coexist. Sure a .com domain name is worth more on the market TODAY. So what. All the more reason for anyone wanting to put up a website for the future to grab a good .mobi name today while they can. Dot mobi names are widely available for businesses - short, generic, easy to remember, and way less expensive.
.
binaryman said:My question is: Can a .Com site also have those same qualities that a .mobi has? I mean can it also simultaneously include the same experience on a mobile phone as .mobi does without device detection. In other words can one program or design a .Com site as if it was a .Mobi site?
OK then I cant see the need for .Com sites to have to resort to .M.com or device detection and Opera browsers for being able to be viewed just like a .mobi on a cellphone and at the same time still offer a fullscreen PC experience.mrdomainman said:
binaryman said:OK then I cant see the need for .Com sites to have to resort to .M.com or device detection and Opera browsers for being able to be viewed just like a .mobi on a cellphone and at the same time still offer a fullscreen PC experience.
mrdomainman said:You're welcome
I can see what you mean.
You mean like develop a full website using .mobi and auto redirect to mobile version when visiting through the phone browser? ie wap.hotclips.mobi
I think any extension can do that.
Build a normal website and auto redirect for mobile.
However, we are also seeing companies starting to use adopt .mobi as a way of redirecting to mobile version from their .com or any extension.
As I've mentioned several times before, I believe that both .mobi and tech/low data plan will be utilized by mobile web users in the near future.
newdomainer.mobi said:That's just about the perfect way to utilise a dotmobi... especially (but exclusively) where a business cannot obtain a decent domain name in .com or .cc (if a localised trading company)
I think that the redirect may be used by many but I think that as a short cut & for branding many businesses are going to make use of their dotmobi address for direct access (where they are using a std TLD for their main site).
It's the same as a 'well known mobile forum' which uses the dotmobi for a desktop site but renders perfectly on a mobile.
Even if a company doesn't particularly want a mobile site it is probably the best excuse yet to justify using a .com alternative without it looking like a compromise or '2nd best' - that reason alone could take up a 10% - 20% market share of the mobile web.