- Impact
- 5,243
Guess who bought Tickets.mobi!!? Straight from the 'king' himself!
RicksBlog
Time for naysayer 'reassess'??!?
RicksBlog
Time for naysayer 'reassess'??!?
I think you are missing a BIG point - dot mobi sites are NOT LIMITED to mobile access only - yes, they are intended to GUARANTEE mobile access but they can also simultaneously include full PC size information. You can use device detection and serve BOTH mobile and non-mobile pages. Just don't use frames, tables and large graphics on the mobile pages. Common sense requirements. Newer CSS designs already do away with the need for tables anyway and frames are typically not a real good idea to use for a number of reasons.sdsinc said:Well not quite. My point is that .mobi is not an established extension like .com. An average .com is still worth more than its mobi counterpart.
Besides the scope of the TLD is narrower. A lot of businesses don't have a mobile site and will never have because they have no need for it.
Again, when I say mobile site it doesn't even mean a .mobi site.
acc said:I think you are missing a BIG point - dot mobi sites are NOT LIMITED to mobile access only - yes, they are intended to GUARANTEE mobile access but they can also simultaneously include full PC size information. You can use device detection and serve BOTH mobile and non-mobile pages. Just don't use frames, tables and large graphics on the mobile pages. Common sense requirements. Newer CSS designs already do away with the need for tables anyway and frames are typically not a real good idea to use for a number of reasons.
Dot mobi domain names are VERSATILE and an individual or a business of any size can - today - still acquire great keyword .mobi names for a small fraction of the price of their dot com counterparts. Useful, reasonably priced or downright inexpensive, and targetted toward the fastest growing segment of the online world. Not the biggest yet just the fastest growing.
Both online worlds and both extensions can coexist. Sure a .com domain name is worth more on the market TODAY. So what. All the more reason for anyone wanting to put up a website for the future to grab a good .mobi name today while they can. Dot mobi names are widely available for businesses - short, generic, easy to remember, and way less expensive.
.
Exactly! This is what soooo many have missed. It's not just for mobile devices!! And .mobi will get the jump on all other extensions with this scenerio, because those sites are being actively built now moreso and moreso, and with browser/device detect. And as surfers go to 'explore' these new sites to see what they are about, they will discover this. No other extension is actively being promoted (or hyped) as much as .mobi is, and will be, for the next few years, and current website owners are not running to put browser/device detect into their current sites. In a few years we will see a shift in extension popularity and usage as more and more realize which sites will be the easiest to access and use whether it be pc or mobile device. And one can rant technology and iphone praises all they want, they will however just be a part of the solutions for a mobile web, not the solution. As will .mobi.acc said:I think you are missing a BIG point - dot mobi sites are NOT LIMITED to mobile access only - yes, they are intended to GUARANTEE mobile access but they can also simultaneously include full PC size information. You can use device detection and serve BOTH mobile and non-mobile pages...
sdsinc said:To put it bluntly the overwhelming majority of registered mobi are quasi worthless and don't have a chance. But I get your point.
I have a good command of CSS and content negotiation techniques.acc said:I think you are missing a BIG point - dot mobi sites are NOT LIMITED to mobile access only - yes, they are intended to GUARANTEE mobile access but they can also simultaneously include full PC size information. You can use device detection and serve BOTH mobile and non-mobile pages. Just don't use frames, tables and large graphics on the mobile pages. Common sense requirements. Newer CSS designs already do away with the need for tables anyway and frames are typically not a real good idea to use for a number of reasons.
OK one example: I have a client that sells expensive testing equipment, they usually work on GSA schedule and deal with 5-9 federal/state bureaucrats. The average order is 35K. Really it's not the kind of business that would be conducted on a mobile site/on the move.keithmt said:It may be hard for some to see now but any info offered via the pc will be offered on mobile. Why would the mobile web be limited in any way? If you could have access to the entire internet anytime, anyplace, would'nt you utilize it? While you may not, billions of others will. It will happen sooner than you think...I promise!
sdsinc said:Well not quite. My point is that .mobi is not an established extension like .com. An average .com is still worth more than its mobi counterpart.
Besides the scope of the TLD is narrower. A lot of businesses don't have a mobile site and will never have because they have no need for it.
Again, when I say mobile site it doesn't even mean a .mobi site.
rickkumar said:So Rick owns these as per a thread in another forum:
Flowers.mobi
JERKOFF.MOBI
creampies.mobi
lickme.mobi
morons.mobi
freephonecards.mobi
tickets.mobi
DomainTalker said:Rick also owns:
Casinos.mobi
StockQuotes.mobi
Wow.mobi
+ a big Adult .mobi portfolio, I hear.
Most (if not all) of us here have invested in .mobi domains because we judge that it will be a profitable business investment - now, or in the future.
Some domain investors deal in $xx....and, some deal in $xxx,xxx,xxx. All are valid.
Lets not forget that a $10 investment in a .mobi - that you sell for $25 - is a 250% profit return....And, that's a terrific return on investment within, say, months, or a year (where else can you do that?)...
A profit is a profit - and that's the (only) real point of doing business.
I hear Rick Schwartz simply saying that - from all he knows - from his experience - his guess is that .mobi (and the mobile web) is likely to be pretty big....Maybe the No 2 extension to .com.
I hear him say that - in his (personal) investment strategy - he's interested in a small number of key .mobi words...because his guess is that - if his bet is right - these keywords will be worth a LOT of money one day....Because of his past activity, I (we) assume he means serious $xxx,xxx ++.
So, an experienced domainer is placing his bets on .mobi, in his own way, on his own strategy...
I'd say it'd be wise to note Rick's past experience - tuck his opinion away at the back of the mind - and, ignore the numbers he deals in...
And...
...Never forget the $25 that is a 250% return, on a $10 .mobi investment...That's great business...
...I'd counsel paying close attention to mobile web news - and trends & developments - and the opinions of those around us that you respect...
...and then follow your own instincts - taking profits along the way, when you can - whatever its size.
....Your own judgement & instincts will be as good a guide as anyone else's - even the 'famous' ones...
.
sdsinc said:I have a good command of CSS and content negotiation techniques.
For that very reason I would rather use browser detection than dilute my .com branding.
mobi does nothing that .com cannot.
OK one example: I have a client that sells expensive testing equipment, they usually work on GSA schedule and deal with 5-9 federal/state bureaucrats. The average order is 35K. Really it's not the kind of business that would be conducted on a mobile site/on the move.
My client will never bother with a mobile website. It would be like eskimos purchasing fridges :]
Many many sites will never go mobile or not anytime soon because their business model does not fit mobile usage.
Now if I had say 10% mobile visitors to my site then clearly I would do something to optimise their experience it while staying in .com. But until a critical mass is reached I would have other priorities like translating my sites to Spanish for example.
I'm not afraid of missing out on mobi because mobile sites will continue to exist under .com and other extensions.
-RJ- said:Selling a MOBI for $25 is not a 250% return if it takes you two years to do so.
Selling a MOBI for $25 is not a 250% return if the other three you registered are unsaleable.
The TLD is not going to be what makes or breaks your investment. You can invest wisely or foolishly in every namespace. After all, over 90% of the currently registered .COM's would be considered worthless on the resale market.
As in any extension domain, buy smart and you'll be fine.
It's not? (ignoring the fact that $25 would actually be a $150% return)-RJ- said:Selling a MOBI for $25 is not a 250% return if it takes you two years to do so.
This I agree with. Yielding a 250% return on one name is not a 250% return on your .mobi investment.-RJ- said:Selling a MOBI for $25 is not a 250% return if the other three you registered are unsaleable.
Maybe it is if you can convince your registrar to give you free renewals. Mine isn't going for it yet, no matter how many times I say "please". :]gou said:It's not? (ignoring the fact that $25 would actually be a $150% return)-RJ- said:Selling a MOBI for $25 is not a 250% return if it takes you two years to do so.
..but did you say 'pretty' please?? :p-RJ- said:Maybe it is if you can convince your registrar to give you free renewals. Mine isn't going for it yet, no matter how many times I say "please". :]
Gotcha.-RJ- said:Maybe it is if you can convince your registrar to give you free renewals. Mine isn't going for it yet, no matter how many times I say "please". :]
Bottom line: the market will decide the fate of the extension... not domainers.newdomainer.mobi said:A truly arrogant comment to make "a lot of businesses will never have a need for a mobile site"
How ignorant a stance is that? - I did an exercise a long while back... I picked random 20 or 30 businesses - imaginery or real; one by one I found a use for a mobile site that would be relevant for that company (& you must treat the question as though it must be answered)
Care to share your sources ? I have been involved with Internet development since the early days. It's not like I am an Internet newbie :hehe:tophatter said:Yes & aren't you the same person who said that no one will ever need a website because we have a phone book & local newspaper.
Or maybee you might be the person who didn't jump in the mobi landrush & wish they did so in that case SOUR GRAPES>![]()
![]()
RJ said:DT's post made it sound like every MOBI was worth something now
gou said:It wouldn't be an annual return of 250%, but it's still a 250% return. At least in securities investing we calculate capital gains that way.
Then your client's marketing department will be missing out on another selling tool. All the tech sales guys have been carrying laptops for the last ten years. I forsee a segment of them replacing or at the very east supplementing their laptop with a smart phone which they will ALWAYS have with them anyway. That is the point - a mobile device is ALWAYS with you and therefore mobile websites or subdirectories on a main PC website can be very useful for instant information or as a sales tool.sdsinc said:... OK one example: I have a client that sells expensive testing equipment, they usually work on GSA schedule and deal with 5-9 federal/state bureaucrats. The average order is 35K. Really it's not the kind of business that would be conducted on a mobile site/on the move.
My client will never bother with a mobile website. It would be like eskimos purchasing fridges :]
Many many sites will never go mobile or not anytime soon because their business model does not fit mobile usage.
Now if I had say 10% mobile visitors to my site then clearly I would do something to optimise their experience it while staying in .com. But until a critical mass is reached I would have other priorities like translating my sites to Spanish for example.
I'm not afraid of missing out on mobi because mobile sites will continue to exist under .com and other extensions.