- Impact
- 5,069
Guess who bought Tickets.mobi!!? Straight from the 'king' himself!
RicksBlog
Time for naysayer 'reassess'??!?
RicksBlog
Time for naysayer 'reassess'??!?
hawkeye said:Guess who bought Tickets.mobi!!? Straight from the 'king' himself!
RicksBlog
Time for naysayer 'reassess'??!?
klm390 said:"Open minds seize opportunities that closed minds will never see."
Now who would he be talking about?
sags said:Rick is talking about not only himself, but a fellow domainer who has been in the business since 1992.
It is hard to argue with their kind of success.
They know the domain name business inside out. They are personal friends with the internet insiders.
Rick confirms what I suspected. The truly valuable mobi domains are limited in number and are those perfectly matched to the media.
Some acronyms, because businesses adore and use them, and truly generic terms are the ones to own.
The "limited" number of perfect domains will make them incredibly valuable.
Rick has taken the time to give everyone his best opinion. He probably just drove up the price he will have to pay to secure the other names on his "top list". Especially, if other well heeled domainers decide they should weigh in.
For most domainers, businesses will be looking for the "next best" domains and that is the category that most of us fall into with our offerings.
For example music.mobi is arguably the best domain in it's space. It won't be the only music site offered, so what is the "next best"? That is the need the rest of us can fill.
We should take his advice and thank him.
Regards,
Sags
newdomainer.mobi said:Nice one Binaryman.... & there I was thinking you didn't have many names left
I think musicheaven / site / club / lounge & Euro all have brandability........ not sure about Xpress but certainly not a lame duck in itself..
Good luck with them.
arnie said:actually: MusicSite.mobi is best name there imo
Very generic and should get you a premium one day :imho: :sold:
To put it bluntly the overwhelming majority of registered mobi are quasi worthless and don't have a chance. But I get your point.sags said:..
Rick confirms what I suspected. The truly valuable mobi domains are limited in number and are those perfectly matched to the media.
Some acronyms, because businesses adore and use them, and truly generic terms are the ones to own.
The "limited" number of perfect domains will make them incredibly valuable.
...
I disagree.sdsinc said:To put it bluntly the overwhelming majority of registered mobi are quasi worthless and don't have a chance. But I get your point.
sdsinc said:To put it bluntly the overwhelming majority of registered mobi are quasi worthless and don't have a chance. But I get your point.
Okay - lets put things in perspective.sdsinc said:To put it bluntly the overwhelming majority of registered mobi are quasi worthless and don't have a chance. But I get your point.
Just like how 99% of the registered .com are worthless I suppose.sdsinc said:To put it bluntly the overwhelming majority of registered mobi are quasi worthless and don't have a chance. But I get your point.
Well not quite. My point is that .mobi is not an established extension like .com. An average .com is still worth more than its mobi counterpart.gou said:Just like how 99% of the registered .com are worthless I suppose.
So you're saying that many businesses will never have thesdsinc said:Well not quite. My point is that .mobi is not an established extension like .com. An average .com is still worth more than its mobi counterpart.
Besides the scope of the TLD is narrower. A lot of businesses don't have a mobile site and will never have because they have no need for it.
Again, when I say mobile site it doesn't even mean a .mobi site.
That fact is nothing new...sdsinc said:Well not quite. My point is that .mobi is not an established extension like .com. An average .com is still worth more than its mobi counterpart.
If the US ever becomes anything like Japan in terms of the popularity of mobile internet, they will.sdsinc said:Besides the scope of the TLD is narrower. A lot of businesses don't have a mobile site and will never have because they have no need for it.
Again, when I say mobile site it doesn't even mean a .mobi site.
I think you are missing a BIG point - dot mobi sites are NOT LIMITED to mobile access only - yes, they are intended to GUARANTEE mobile access but they can also simultaneously include full PC size information. You can use device detection and serve BOTH mobile and non-mobile pages. Just don't use frames, tables and large graphics on the mobile pages. Common sense requirements. Newer CSS designs already do away with the need for tables anyway and frames are typically not a real good idea to use for a number of reasons.sdsinc said:Well not quite. My point is that .mobi is not an established extension like .com. An average .com is still worth more than its mobi counterpart.
Besides the scope of the TLD is narrower. A lot of businesses don't have a mobile site and will never have because they have no need for it.
Again, when I say mobile site it doesn't even mean a .mobi site.
acc said:I think you are missing a BIG point - dot mobi sites are NOT LIMITED to mobile access only - yes, they are intended to GUARANTEE mobile access but they can also simultaneously include full PC size information. You can use device detection and serve BOTH mobile and non-mobile pages. Just don't use frames, tables and large graphics on the mobile pages. Common sense requirements. Newer CSS designs already do away with the need for tables anyway and frames are typically not a real good idea to use for a number of reasons.
Dot mobi domain names are VERSATILE and an individual or a business of any size can - today - still acquire great keyword .mobi names for a small fraction of the price of their dot com counterparts. Useful, reasonably priced or downright inexpensive, and targetted toward the fastest growing segment of the online world. Not the biggest yet just the fastest growing.
Both online worlds and both extensions can coexist. Sure a .com domain name is worth more on the market TODAY. So what. All the more reason for anyone wanting to put up a website for the future to grab a good .mobi name today while they can. Dot mobi names are widely available for businesses - short, generic, easy to remember, and way less expensive.
.
Exactly! This is what soooo many have missed. It's not just for mobile devices!! And .mobi will get the jump on all other extensions with this scenerio, because those sites are being actively built now moreso and moreso, and with browser/device detect. And as surfers go to 'explore' these new sites to see what they are about, they will discover this. No other extension is actively being promoted (or hyped) as much as .mobi is, and will be, for the next few years, and current website owners are not running to put browser/device detect into their current sites. In a few years we will see a shift in extension popularity and usage as more and more realize which sites will be the easiest to access and use whether it be pc or mobile device. And one can rant technology and iphone praises all they want, they will however just be a part of the solutions for a mobile web, not the solution. As will .mobi.acc said:I think you are missing a BIG point - dot mobi sites are NOT LIMITED to mobile access only - yes, they are intended to GUARANTEE mobile access but they can also simultaneously include full PC size information. You can use device detection and serve BOTH mobile and non-mobile pages...
sdsinc said:To put it bluntly the overwhelming majority of registered mobi are quasi worthless and don't have a chance. But I get your point.
I have a good command of CSS and content negotiation techniques.acc said:I think you are missing a BIG point - dot mobi sites are NOT LIMITED to mobile access only - yes, they are intended to GUARANTEE mobile access but they can also simultaneously include full PC size information. You can use device detection and serve BOTH mobile and non-mobile pages. Just don't use frames, tables and large graphics on the mobile pages. Common sense requirements. Newer CSS designs already do away with the need for tables anyway and frames are typically not a real good idea to use for a number of reasons.
OK one example: I have a client that sells expensive testing equipment, they usually work on GSA schedule and deal with 5-9 federal/state bureaucrats. The average order is 35K. Really it's not the kind of business that would be conducted on a mobile site/on the move.keithmt said:It may be hard for some to see now but any info offered via the pc will be offered on mobile. Why would the mobile web be limited in any way? If you could have access to the entire internet anytime, anyplace, would'nt you utilize it? While you may not, billions of others will. It will happen sooner than you think...I promise!