So, five hours ago you post this:
Then, you go on a multi-post rant like an energizer bunny with zero "screen shots and proof" in sight.
@DAN.COM shows up, answers your post, and also posts what purport to be screen shots of the transaction from their end, and you still haven't made good on your original post in this thread for these screen shots of yours.
You've also posted that
@DAN.COM held your money for a "week", when it looks to be closer to three days. However, sometimes, international wire transfers can be held up, for a variety of reasons.
Now
@ksusha64 hasn't mentioned what country they are in, but it could take some time for the December 9 payment from
@DAN.COM to reach the destination account - and possibly not by the Monday morning time at which
@ksusha64 made the OP in this thread.
My best guess is that
@ksusha64 is upset by the fact that the domain listing was not legit in the first place, and that annoyance has blinded him or her to perhaps making a mistake in looking at his/her bank records, and mis-attributed two payments to the expected refund.
Here's a simple question for the reader... if part of the refund payment from
@DAN.COM was sent to
@ksusha64 from "a different company" as alleged by
@ksusha64 , then on what basis is
@ksusha64 claiming that it has anything to do with any amount sent by
@DAN.COM ? I mean, instead of saying "there were two wires which are $4,000 short, and one is from a different company" why isn't he or she saying "there was one wire which was $XX,XXX short"?
That detail alone in
@ksusha64 's story doesn't make any sense to me.
If "Bob" owed me 10,000, and I received a 5,000 payment from Bob, and a 4,000 payment from Alice, I would be saying that Bob shorted me by 5,000. I wouldn't be saying that Bob shorted me by 1,000 and sent part of his payment pretending to be Alice. Why would I even think the payment from Alice had anything to do with Bob?