Jeff,
You're still doing better than almost every day of October and better than November 1st.
You're one of the only better days was November 2nd, which was a very buggy day yesterday as we rolled out entire re-development of backend and new server for tracking clicks and somehow some domains got clicks reported correctly, while others completely lost track. It was the strangest bug I have ever seen, somehow the server side language was not considering 0.0 to be the same as 0, even though for 2 years it has.
Whenever our click server is delayed - that's it - it'll never be as it should have been because everything is correlated and the server has 30 minute blocks to do all the work in those 30 minutes for every 30 minute block. It's a very long, complicated story you do not want to hear. But the thing to remember, when a credit takes place, it never will be accurate.
Now we will have data by domain, so credits will most likely always be quite accurate if something were to go wrong.
For now, how about let's stick on the current feed?

We don't have data for it yet, so revenue hasn't changed at all +/- on a domain basis. Data is based on the estimates of old provider.
I don't want to scare anyone or make anyone happy. I just don't know how it'll perform yet. We will have to wait and see a few days, then our system will have to start grabbing data from new provider and using estimates based on that, so just give it a few days and I'm sure everything will be quite ok.
But, to answer your question - chances are no. Technically I have been surprised that old feed was running as long as it has. From what I understand, our old upstream was not even allowed to have it, neither was their upstream allowed to give it out. Long chain of no-no's. So we are either on a stable setup, or on a crooked setup that one day might be even worser than Ask fiasco - no ads at all. Which do you want to choose?

I'll take stable any day. But once again - it could be better as well, we'll have to wait.