With respect, the argument in this thread started because we were told this, which I refuted:
I have received no valuable evidence to the contrary.
But anyway, lets look at the context surrounding the sales you have highlighted:
- Web3pay (web3 obviously) and Handcrafted.xyz (unknown, no website)... user admits to overpaying for domains unlike Swetha and is staunch defender of Swetha and XYZ in September 2020 acknowledged that Swetha had picked up all of the good dictionary word XYZ names, twice which is what most people have been saying.
- Pastry... web3 website. User previously said in 2017 they had over 100 XYZ names but nearly all of those mentioned have dropped since this post, funnily enough they're all pretty much all owned by you now Swetha (eg Binoular.xyz, hydraulic.xyz, blower.xyz, garter.xyz, chromium.xyz, pesticides.xyz, paramedic.xyz, silica.xyz) according to the whois. XYZ portfolio currently stands at 72 so has bought back in despite previous failure.
- Two low $XXX sales. User says they hold over 400 .XYZ names and according to that post they're not renewing 90% of them member since May 2020. How were they encouraged as a newb to waste so much money on so many .99 cent regs? It's not a mystery.
- Petalite... a random mineral... so definitely a web3 acquisition imho, however user owns 4,600+ XYZ names purchased since 2 months ago (That's a lot of names to buy in a short period) and this is their first .XYZ domain sale as mentioned in the post.
None of these are exactly shining beacons that the Swetha effect can be replicated. However their contributions DO allow us to build up a picture about XYZ and their contributions as such are appreciated. But just pointing out some sales isn't enough like some kind've mic-drop moment. As
@alcy frequently mentions, ROI is important, not just individual sale prices.
Nobody is bringing anyone down, it's just reality and context. Be careful what you invest in or believe folks!