I don't think it's fair to judge anyone for their giving because everyone could always give more until everyone had the same amount
I think the "philantrophy" thing, always comes up as a stark reminder that you cannot bring your money to the AfterLife (afterlife.com is already taken, sorry).
Not a moral issue, but just some kind of arithmetic that if you have 10 billion dollars in your bank account, and you know you're going to die in 2 months time, you have no choice but to decide to pass ALL of it to someone else. So it's just a curiosity on where his wealth went.
These people aren't "employees" like most people. They are right-hand men. They are lead engineers and lead designers who have DIRECT influence on their "employer".
Jonathan Ive is not a regular employee.
In a huge corporation, you either get promoted to the "managerial level", or stay on as the "genius lab rat".
I don't think when Bill Gates went on to become the CEO for Microsoft, he still got the time to become the genius behind many of Microsoft's flagship products.
Steve Jobs' iconic stature, perhaps was also propelled by journalism and media coverage.
People never thought about Steve Jobs when they were enjoying watching "Toy Story" or "Finding Nemo". Movies don't give a spotlight on the company that made it (Pixar). But instead, it was Tom Hanks who was on the spotlight.
Steve Jobs' prominence was highlighted ten-fold by being the voice of Apple during Apple Developer's Conference where the famous products got launched to the world. And therefore, it was Steve Jobs' face that got embedded into peoples' minds.
And that's also the reason why Jonathan Ive, is not a household name. Jonathan Ive is Apple's genius lab rat.