Dynadot

showcase Showcase you 9N.com domains

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Muhammad Atif Qazi

Established Member
Impact
46
278 888 889
667 788 998
678 888 889
878 888 998
885 888 788
278 888 889

What do you guys think?
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
I have many but here's one I really like.

889 998 999
 
0
•••
188888811.com
888887889.com
888288822.com
888688866.com
558888885.com
588888855.com
888818881.com
888822588.com
888838883.com
888828882.com
888825588.com
888858883.com
 
2
•••
Unless there is a distinct pattern, for example, bookend triples (especially 8's) and appealing and memorable palindromes with meaningful numbers, I doubt very much if 9N can create a decent aftermarket value.
 
1
•••
0
•••
I have only one: 998 998 999 :)
 
2
•••
I have many but here's one I really like.

889 998 999
So should we wait for the 9Ns.com to become valuable enough to sell them or start auctioning them ?
 
0
•••
So should we wait for the 9Ns.com to become valuable enough to sell them or start auctioning them ?

Domaining is a hobby of mine. I'm no self proclaimed expert.

There's currently not a big market for 9N and I'm personally in rush to sell. I'm sitting on mine.
 
0
•••
0
•••
0
•••
I only have one - and definitely won't be buying any more.

887 888 889
 
2
•••
Unless there is a distinct pattern, for example, bookend triples (especially 8's) and appealing and memorable palindromes with meaningful numbers, I doubt very much if 9N can create a decent aftermarket value.
000100200 is one of my favorites
 
2
•••
I only registered one 9N and won't register more.
808 818 808
I doubt it will ever worth anything but its got some pattern.
 
1
•••
I only registered one 8N and won't register more.
808 818 808
I doubt it will ever worth anything but its got some pattern.
not too bad 808818808 ....palindrome, just gotta wait a year or two?
~
I have 888101888 ........easy to read
 
1
•••
My take on 9N is
  • 8s + only one other digit
  • extremely meaningful combinations ( stress on extremely )
Today I noticed the first 10N domain backordered and with bids at Pheenix
6666668888.com $69
 
1
•••
:)

888131888
888161888
888171888
888181888
888191888
888212888
888262888
888272888
888282888
888283888
888292888
888313888
888323888
888363888
888373888
888383888
888626888
888686888
888696888
888717888
888727888
888737888
888767888
888768888
888787888
888797888
888878887
888919888
888929888
888939888
888979888
888989888​
 
1
•••
:)

888131888
888161888
888171888
888181888
888191888
888212888
888262888
888272888
888282888
888283888
888292888
888313888
888323888
888363888
888373888
888383888
888626888
888686888
888696888
888717888
888727888
888737888
888767888
888768888
888787888
888797888
888878887
888919888
888929888
888939888
888979888
888989888​
see too many number 8 that my head faint.
 
1
•••
:)

888131888
888161888
888171888
888181888
888191888
888212888
888262888
888272888
888282888
888283888
888292888
888313888
888323888
888363888
888373888
888383888
888626888
888686888
888696888
888717888
888727888
888737888
888767888
888768888
888787888
888797888
888878887
888919888
888929888
888939888
888979888
888989888​

You have cornered the market , 888181888 is easily the best
 
1
•••
0
•••
I have 882838888.com

I did have a few like this but more than 3 8's looks clumsy in my view, like I said I had/have a few but not my best
 
0
•••
You have cornered the market , 888181888 is easily the best

Visually, maybe, it splits the triples nicely... But I think eventually 888686888 or 888383888 would be the bigger sellers because of the 38 and 68 added meanings.
 
0
•••
I like domains that I remember instantly but you have a point
 
0
•••
0
•••
Yep the "good ole days" Ah how we miss em
 
1
•••
I remember creating a similar thread about.this
Anywaysil i dont have a lot of these..I have

999992838.com

888899898.com

888282828.com

282828788.com

888282282.com

888882838.com

I have a great feeling N8s will sell better than N9s.
 
1
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back