IT.COM

Is namesilo frontrunning

Spaceship
Watch
Status
Not open for further replies.

robert widener

Established Member
Impact
238
just so you all know .... namesilo is frontrunning , checked a domain yesterday & today i went to get it & it's gone ...... guess who owns it NAMESILO . so dont be checking any domains at namesilo because if you dont buy it right then it may be gone the next day . does president michael goldfarb have an account here ? ...would he like to respond ?
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
This thread is a waste of time. I mean, you could at least post the whois record with relevant dates and timestamps even while omitting the domain name.
then move on kate , thanks for the advice though i'll keep that in mind for future references
 
Last edited:
0
•••
edited .... will have something to say later
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Namesilo 6.99 .com. 7.99 .net and 5.99 .org Is still going on..... just fyi
 
0
•••
Similar situation just happened to me earlier today; placed a max bid on a domain < 1 hour prior it completely expiring and now its suddenly renewed and parked with Undeveloped; will investigate privately ...

*Not saying this is the case, but the chance of the previous owner to (finally) renew < 1 hour prior a VERY LONG expiration cycle is strange. Perhaps NameSilo pushes redemption fee's if bids are placed with hopes to rake in expensive revivals of expired domains? No matter how you slice it, something is off here.

**Not accusing anyone.... yet.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
When people let their names almost expire like this, do they have to pay a higher amount to renew?
 
0
•••
In certain hot niches people are registering names every single day. Every thought you’ve had someone very often beat you to it. (Hello Coin & Crypto Names) It’s not particularly odd for a name you saw open yesterday to be gone today.

Op opened this thread to do a smear campaign on @namesilo that is obvious. I hope this thread gets taken down as he has not even come back to provide proof of his accusation.

I have typed many things at NS with no such issues but I generally don’t check unless I am ready to buy.
dont you think its odd that when someone goes back to reg name ...its always regged at registry where they checked ? why not ever regged at some other registry ?
 
0
•••
What you outline here is extremely common at NameSilo. There are many owners there that let domains expire and go to auction, and renew just before the auction is about to close. Why they do this, I don't know.

Another thing is, once somebody places a bid on an expired domains, NameSilo emails the owner to notify them that there is a bid and that the domain will consequently be sold upon the end of the auction (at least I got those emails last when I let some names expire that got bids in the expired domain auctions). It seems that "most" owners that had decided to let a domain expire will change their mind and go to renew that domain after they are notified that somebody has bid on it.

Based on my own experience I'd say that about 80-90% of the expired domains I bid on at NameSilo got renewed after my bid. With the way their expired domain auction system works it's mostly a waste of time to bid on expired domains there.
when a domain is in auction & somebody bids on it namesilo shouldnt be e-mailing the owner of said domain so that they can SNATCH IT at the last moment from prospective buyer ( kinda shady ) if you ask me .
 
0
•••
Similar situation just happened to me earlier today; placed a max bid on a domain < 1 hour prior it completely expiring and now its suddenly renewed and parked with Undeveloped; will investigate privately ...

*Not saying this is the case, but the chance of the previous owner to (finally) renew < 1 hour prior a VERY LONG expiration cycle is strange. Perhaps NameSilo pushes redemption fee's if bids are placed with hopes to rake in expensive revivals of expired domains? No matter how you slice it, something is off here.

**Not accusing anyone.... yet.
agree 100 %
 
0
•••
DynaDot and GoDaddy have recently tried to implement changes to make more expired domain auctions complete, and not have owners intentionally let domains expire just to renew them at the last moment.

At name.com, we receive expired domain purchases instantly upon purchase (they deliver 100% of won expired auctions).

Have you considered changing your expired domain auctions system? For example, instead of running a 25 day auction, how about doing 5 day or 10 day auctions starting on day 26, where the domain will always be delivered to buyer? Or extending the auction time to 30 days, where former owners can only renew the domain on the first 25 days? Right now the system is set up in a way so that more domains that get bids get renewed than what I have seen on any other platform.

Sending notification emails to former owners telling them that their domain is getting bid on also seems to invite domainers to let their names expire to let the market determine whether any of them have value, and then renew all of those that get bids. Many users are clearly abusing the system to let the "crowd" determine which of their domains are perceived to have value, and then proceed to renew all of those. I saw one guy let something like 30 domains based around a new tech expire. I bid on two of them. He renewed those two and let the other 28 that didn't get bids expire. There is a lot of activity like this. Also, domainers let valuable domains expire, they get bid on ($X,XXX), and then renewed at the last moment. This is just a way of drawing attention to their domains, in the hopes that the same people bidding will come to them after they have renewed the domain and attempt to acquire it from them privately. All these games played by people who let their domain expire with the intention of renewing them wastes a lot of time for legit bidders who spend time researching and bidding on these expired domains.
agree ...its a waste of time & the practice should be stopped
 
0
•••
I don’t think they should be sending those emails out once it hits auction. Why are we bidding to have it snatched away? The owner had ample time to renew. More than once the owner renews in the last 30 minutes of an auction close. I think it’s just a mind game.
 
0
•••
I don’t think they should be sending those emails out once it hits auction. Why are we bidding to have it snatched away? The owner had ample time to renew. More than once the owner renews in the last 30 minutes of an auction close. I think it’s just a mind game.
maybe NAMESILO would like to respond ? ...i doubt it though .
 
0
•••
lol , NOTHING from namesilo ? ....doesnt shock me .
 
0
•••
Hello. I can let you know this is absolutely not the case. As with many other registrar expired domain processes, our Registrants can wait until the last minute to renew to gauge domain valuation as a significant percentage of bids in our system for expired domains occur within the last 24 hours (and many within the last hour to few minutes) of the expired domain auctions concluding. We make more money if an expired domain is auctioned than if it is renewed, so not sure the implication of us "pushing redemption fees" or anything else.
"we make more money if domain is auctioned "....thats not always true & you know that
 
0
•••
I don’t think they should be sending those emails out once it hits auction. Why are we bidding to have it snatched away? The owner had ample time to renew. More than once the owner renews in the last 30 minutes of an auction close. I think it’s just a mind game.
basically what namesilo & any other registrar doing this is giving bidders the middle finger ...lets be honest , its UNETHICAL & GREEDY.once it hits auction its up for grabs. if owner wants it let him bid on it
 
0
•••
Time for this thread to be closed I think. Sounds like the domain was renewed and someone is a little bitter.
probably works for namesilo ,lol
 
0
•••
Why do you keep editing your posts? You started this thread in December and still haven't backed up your claim with anything real. And you do realize anybody here can simply check for themselves? Try some names, come back in a few days and check. I did and the names were still available.

You have 4 of these in the last 30 minutes:
edited
thanks for keeping tabs buddy , lol . because what i wrote originally might have namesilo lawyers sending me more nasty threatening e-mails . when i started this thread they were not very happy . i contacted namesilo president ....even left a message for him on his answering machine at the time to contact me by e-mail or phone , did i hear anything from him NO ( dude couldnt take a few minutes too talk or send an e-mail) ? ..yeah namesilo really cares about their customers
 
Last edited:
0
•••
lol , NOTHING from namesilo ? ....doesnt shock me .
Hey Robert what was the name if you don't mind sharing ,what ill do is give you a better one to hand reg I'm sure then the one that passed you by
 
Last edited:
0
•••
dont you think its odd that when someone goes back to reg name ...its always regged at registry where they checked ?

It would be odd if that were true, but it's not true. I see names get regged at Registrar B that I checked at Registrar A all the time.
 
0
•••
You already got responses from a NameSilo rep in this thread. President probably has more important stuff to deal with than unsubstantiated claims. Again, no proof on your part, didn't post the name. And people can check your claims for themselves. They can do this now and post their results.
lol ,
You already got responses from a NameSilo rep in this thread. President probably has more important stuff to deal with than unsubstantiated claims. Again, no proof on your part, didn't post the name. And people can check your claims for themselves. They can do this now and post their results in the coming days.
lol , just because people do that & names DONT GET R regged doesnt mean MINE WASNT .
Then don't bid there, problem solved.

There are certain MPs I don't like bidding at, and guess what, I don't bid there. Problem solved!
lol, thanks CAPTAIN OBVIOUS
 
0
•••
@ Robert - If you have no proof of them front-running maybe you should try getting back to your life and not wasting it posting unsubstantiated claims here.

Also, I've never had a name snatched from me when checking it at Namesilo for availability. Some I would come back to a few days later and reg it there with no problem.
maybe the reason for that is the domain names you were searching just plain sucked ...ever think of that genius ?
 
0
•••
0
•••
It would be odd if that were true, but it's not true. I see names get regged at Registrar B that I checked at Registrar A all the time.
lol , thats not true the majority of the time . yeah , it may happen once in a while but you hear it all the time . someone checked a domain name at say godaddy & then an hour later ( hell ... sometimes minutes) or next day its regged at godaddy or if checked at namesilo the name is regged at namesilo & on & on .
 
0
•••
I had to read your opening post again, before you edit it with edited
What your saying is you searched a name for hand reg, it was available to book. You didn’t book, someone beat you to the punch. Next day, or way people Ęxagerate, 2 months later...
Namesilo is very popular, if i was gonna reg a .com right now, thats the place i would do it.

Why are more than half the posts you have made, other threads, even your third post way back says edit?
iv'e already explained that , just because your too lazy to read entire thread i'm not going to explain it again . thanks & have a good night
 
0
•••
an interesting read , google ..THIS PROVES NOTHING...THEY SAY THEY ARENT FRONTRUNNING & NEVER HAVE " please note:this could apply to any registrar
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Please explain again.
You can always edit afterwards
Namesilo is not front running:xf.grin:
 
0
•••
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back