Dan.com stole my $

[ksusha64]

Dan.com accepted the $ for the domain they knew they did not have. I have proof they didn't have that domain and accepted money anyway. They refunded $4,000 short for the name. They are breaking the law by not keeping your $ in secure escrow account. Instead they returned $4,000 less from different BANK, different COUNTRY, and shorted me $4,000.
I demand they return the $ I paid for the name. They held the $ for 1 week!!! and returned $4,000 short.
Dan.com is complete scam. They refusing to deal with details. I will post screen shots and proof.

 

[VadimK]

This doesn't work. Frontrunners & co manage to bypass the verification process. ( Monitoring & DD since September 02)

Yes, but it's a different issue. In Sedo I can't post the name that is not mine. With Dan it happened to me - by mistake placed two names in .com instead of .xyz , and names were sold in 12 hours (later cancelled of course).

 

[NorthernDomains]

How would you suggest they do that?

They already have a third DNS to verify ownership. They just need to enforce it.

 

[dirk]

They already have a third DNS to verify ownership. They just need to enforce it.

doesn't solve the issue of orphaned domains though.

When it comes to verification, Dan has one of the best systems imo. It could be better ( from a buyers perspective) but it's not bad at all.

 

[dirk]

Fwiw, checked my cancelled transactions at Dan. 100 refund from what I sent to them. Any incurred costs due to my PP.

 

[VadimK]

doesn't solve the issue of orphaned domains though.

When it comes to verification, Dan has one of the best systems imo. It could be better ( from a buyers perspective) but it's not bad at all.

Dan's verification system is not anywhere near the ''best'' as you can list very easily names that are not yours. Read my comment three posts up.

 

[ksusha64]

None of the domaines here stated they paid 5+ figures in euros for domain and got returned exact amount.
Not one person has proof of successful transaction of returning wired funds from dan.com.
Not one person in this chat.

 

[ksusha64]

Maybe Dan.com cheats all buyers of domains who do not get their domain. They happened to be non domaines for most part.
There is not one person here who can show proof of successful similar transaction without being cheated.
If u do please share it

 

[ksusha64]

It seems like a typical scam someone would do with switch and bait.
Selling names you do not have then cheat buyers on exchange rate.
Return the amount when exchange rate is least favorable for buyer.

 

[ksusha64]

Not one domainer here said they had similar situation and got their money back correctly.
NOT ONE PERSON.

 

[Xiberia]

If u send someone 1 btc for a name that you don't have, then wait until btc goes from 60-50K and then return 1 btc thats fraud.

This is not the same thing because you're getting back exactly what you sent. The dollar price only matters if you're going to sell, so just wait for a higher price to sell at and there's no "fraud".

Your case is actually more unfair because yes you were "scammed", you just weren't scammed by Dan. You sent $58k and got back $54k, because banks take their fees and make up their own exchange rates. They do this kind of scamming of everyone and every thing. It's how they work. It's why we all love banks so much.

Nobody asks a question why didn't they return money same day????

Did they even receive the money on the same day?

 

[ksusha64]

Dan.com is not disputing I paid for the name. Dan.com is not disputing I got $4,000 less.
Dan.com said they told me not to send money after money was sent.
Then they wait whole business week to return it. Proving they wanted to hold the money until unfavorable rate.
all facts

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

@ksusha64

You are claiming that DAN informed you to not send the payment after you already sent the payment ...

... so if your claim is true you should be able to proof it by simply posting ...

... a screenshot of their sent message (email) including its original exact timestamp ...
... and ...
... a screenshot of your sent payment (wire) including its original exact timestamp ...

... so that it will be clear which happening (DAN's message or your payment) happened first.

Simple as that.

 

[ksusha64]

If u sent someone 1 BTC when its 60K, but get 1 BTC when its 50K they cheated you got 10K if they had no reason to hold your BTC and sold you air.

 

[ksusha64]

Just because you sent 1 BTC back when its 10K less and use the date when it falls doesn't mean you didn't scam the person for 10K. Thats exactly what they did. They waited until bad exchange rate to return funds.

 

[ksusha64]

@ksusha64

You are claiming that DAN informed you to not send the payment after you already sent the payment ...
... so if your claim is true you should be able to proof it by simply posting ...

... a screenshot of their sent message (email) including its original exact timestamp ...
... and ...
... a screenshot of your sent payment (bank account) including its original exact timestamp ...

... so that it will be clear which happening (DAN's message or your payment) happened first.

Use your logic. Why would anyone send $59,000 usd for a name that they cant get?????
Do I want to lose my money and let someone keep it for no reason?
I sent the money on Sunday, they sent message later on Monday after money was sent.

 

[ksusha64]

Everything dan.com says makes no logical sense including no explanation for not returning money right away.

 

[ksusha64]

I had to contact them whole week to get money back. I might of not get my money back even today if I didn't hound them daily.

 

[ksusha64]

Why would they not return money same day with same rate?

 

[ksusha64]

None of the people in this chat ever sent them 5-6 figures for a name they didn't get in euros and got right amount back.

 

[ksusha64]

None one person can show proof that they ever acted legally and ethically in same situation.