Holo vs VR vs MR vs AR vs any other reality (All realities)

[VRdommy]

Intel Project Alloy - A Must Read
http://www.pcworld.com/article/3108...first-open-source-third-party-vr-headset.html

The pace of change with new VR product designs is about to increase exponentially.
And while this is one thing to move that along, it's not the only thing.

...MORE...
http://www.trustedreviews.com/news/intel-project-alloy-vr-ar-merged-reality

 

[forge]

headphoneshop.com @ 2,000
playgroundindustries.com @ 2,795

headphones is one word.
playground is one word.

 

[VRdommy]

You missed some from just last report. Or am I not seeing your point ? Not enough money ?

SulAmericaSaude.com @ 14,999
bringtheenergy.com @ 4,899
headphoneshop.com @ 2,000
playgroundindustries.com @ 2,795
autohobbyshop.com @ 2,695
racewayautogroup.com @ 2,395
therealestatevault.com @ 3,195
fastfoodsecrets.com @ 2,500

Money is money. Sale is a sale. I'm not trying to get anyone to buy them. Just don't ignore the data.

Folks said a lot about hyphen names but look at the sales. Same with double dot's. And yet I see name sales in the charts with both. I just don't think anyone should ignore data. Most talk about all of this from the gut, not their head.
Wishing does not make it so. One could argue exception not rule, but you can look back and they have always been there. I know since I have been watching them grow in number for more than the last decade.
So, they were just some quick examples anyone could look at/for.

I'm just pointing out what some are not looking for or at. That's all.
We all can judge for ourselves if it's a risk to high as that depends on the exact name anyway. And demand in the sector, or what the demand might be later, so it's still a predictive thing.
You pays your money and ya takes your choice.

I will note that the one you pointed to was nothing more than adding the word 'THE' to an existing name.

therealestatevault.com

Goes to my exact point. When the 'one less word' was not available at any price, what then ?
Real estate was always strong in domains. But that is a 4 word'r ! Longtail and all.
Reminds me when i and e were being used in the same way. And I doubt that is over with. It's what I think about every time I see a commercial for iHair LOL

Clearly they show better than XR in domains. And if that sector was vivid in our niche, we would already see sales to end users. But I don't see them. When ? Everyone has been promoting the term like they have something to gain if we all start using it for more than 4 years now. Using the term does not translate into a domain need. No matter how many times it is posted to news blogs or shows in a google search result. It could be important if it shows in a high quantity of 'user searches' on google. (data the user submits to find something)
So, that remains to be seen. It's a SEO thing.

10 years ago the term was 5D or 9D and where are they now? Thousands of names sold using the term.
Investor frenzy.
As I remember it, there were 2 Chinese co's that used it in domains and that is what started it.
We all play gut feelings sometimes, just don't ignore the data when you do.

LOL, that's the end of my sermon !

 

[NameFu]

You missed some from just last report. Or am I not seeing your point ? Not enough money ?

SulAmericaSaude.com @ 14,999
bringtheenergy.com @ 4,899
headphoneshop.com @ 2,000
playgroundindustries.com @ 2,795
autohobbyshop.com @ 2,695
racewayautogroup.com @ 2,395
therealestatevault.com @ 3,195
fastfoodsecrets.com @ 2,500

He posted the top 100 from this year. If you're talking about the last report for the last 7 days, those would make a nano-percentage of the total report....

Playground is one word. And so is Headphones lol.... .. So it's even less than what you're trying to make it up to be...

 

[ItsCalled]

He posted the top 100 from this year. If you're talking about the last report for the last 7 days, those would make a nano-percentage of the total report....

Playground is one word. And so is Headphones lol.... .. So it's even less than what you're trying to make it up to be...

Are you trying to say there were no 3 word sales this year ?

I can see them. And even those in the top 100 for the year or last year. This month, last month.
Have you looked or are you just looking for any mistakes he makes to pick on ?

As I read your posts, you are saying they are worthless.
So, not exactly so. I think you need to admit what is there. Or what is your point I'm not getting?

Looks like I walked into one of those kinda fights. Can't find a decent board. Child's play everywhere.

 

[ItsCalled]

"Gurman says it will either be called the Reality Pro or XR Pro, with xrOS as the name of the operating software. I respect Gurman, but I literally think it’s impossible that Apple will call a piece of hardware XR Pro. There are no Apple product names which sound like codenames. Apple uses names which are unique but accessible: AirPlay, Face ID, AirTag, Apple Watch. So, based on this, I’m suggesting it’ll be Reality Pro, or the previously rumored Reality One but not XR Pro."

-----

I always felt Apple would call their headset something like 'Apple Reality' but 'Reality Pro' or 'Reality One' does make more sense than 'XR Pro' for an Apple product. I guess we are going to find out tomorrow.

Didn't work out so well for Gurman now did it ?
I had watched his comments and thought he was pretty off base, even though my picks were no better.
In 2018 I thought it was going to be iSight or something like that.
But he sits in a position of "suppose to be knowing". He was picking up facts that were not facts at all.
I guess he made money from all that were listening. I think it's his second bomb.
Seems in this world, no one remembers when you are wrong, only a few times you get it half right. HaHa

 

[NameFu]

Are you trying to say there were no 3 word sales this year ?

I can see them. And even those in the top 100 for the year or last year. This month, last month.
Have you looked or are you just looking for any mistakes he makes to pick on ?

As I read your posts, you are saying they are worthless.
So, not exactly so. I think you need to admit what is there. Or what is your point I'm not getting?

Looks like I walked into one of those kinda fights. Can't find a decent board. Child's play everywhere.

Of course I'm not "trying to say there were no 3 word sales this year". I don't know how you got that impression.

I'm not saying that they are generally worthless either.

I was explaining something and there was a disagreement. Your equating that as childish or a "fighting" misses the very purpose of discussion forums. Disagreements happen guy. And I'm even giving people space to disagree.

 

[VRdommy]

Of course I'm not "trying to say there were no 3 word sales this year". I don't know how you got that impression.

I'm not saying that they are generally worthless either.

I was explaining something and there was a disagreement. Your equating that as childish or a "fighting" misses the very purpose of discussion forums. Disagreements happen guy. And I'm even giving people space to disagree.

I Have been referring to the stupid stuff from the past many pages back. They know who they are. Or were you one of them? I did not read them all.

But, for you, know that you do cross the line when you go past a simple disagreement and speak to anyone's credibility.
That is reading far past a disagreement on comment.
Does not look good. And there can be no good will in it. It's like picking a fight. That is what you were doing.
I would rather ignore you for that, but only to the point it becomes trolling.

I will defend any user from bad acts. And have. And this has been a very open thread.

I try to keep things going when the well is dry as well as when flooded.
For that we have one of the top 10 enduring threads.

Enjoyment of it starts with your actions. There are other threads.

==

Apple hits record high one week after announcing Vision Pro VR headset

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/12/app...k-after-announcing-vision-pro-vr-headset.html


I did notice that they did not say XR. But I did not expect them to do that. But they did not say AR either.

While mixed reality may better describe it, most of the software for the first few years anyway will be predominately VR.

As anticipated, it looks likely the VR term is very sticky. But there is lots of time yet to see how it pans out.

It could very well shift over longer periods with the software. After all, mixed reality software dev is only just starting.

And much of it is built from or on VR development platforms. It remains to be seen just how they will put the environment sensor API's in the devkits for AR/MR.

But wow a $3T company. I remember when the national debt was smaller than that LOL (guess I'm old)

I think they can afford some more really good R&D. I expect to see a lot more of Apple Silicon going forward.

 

[NameFu]

I Have been referring to the stupid stuff from the past many pages back. They know who they are. Or were you one of them? I did not read them all.

But, for you, know that you do cross the line when you go past a simple disagreement and speak to anyone's credibility.
That is reading far past a disagreement on comment.
Does not look good. And there can be no good will in it. It's like picking a fight. That is what you were doing.
I would rather ignore you for that, but only to the point it becomes trolling.

I will defend any user from bad acts. And have. And this has been a very open thread.

I try to keep things going when the well is dry as well as when flooded.
For that we have one of the top 10 enduring threads.

Enjoyment of it starts with your actions. There are other threads.

==

Apple hits record high one week after announcing Vision Pro VR headset

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/12/app...k-after-announcing-vision-pro-vr-headset.html


I did notice that they did not say XR. But I did not expect them to do that. But they did not say AR either.

While mixed reality may better describe it, most of the software for the first few years anyway will be predominately VR.

As anticipated, it looks likely the VR term is very sticky. But there is lots of time yet to see how it pans out.

It could very well shift over longer periods with the software. After all, mixed reality software dev is only just starting.

And much of it is built from or on VR development platforms. It remains to be seen just how they will put the environment sensor API's in the devkits for AR/MR.

But wow a $3T company. I remember when the national debt was smaller than that LOL (guess I'm old)

I think they can afford some more really good R&D. I expect to see a lot more of Apple Silicon going forward.

I think I only replied to you once? Thought you overvalued your 3 word goggles domain right? Sorry, but, this kind of thing happens here guy. No offense meant. Disagreements happen here sometimes and it's really not anything negative about it. P.M. me if you honestly thought I was "picking a fight" by disagreeing with you about your domain. Anyway, let's agree to disagree and move on, shall we? Or feel free to DM me and we can discuss further.

Thanks!

 

[Samer]

I heard that he owns a quarter of a mill .VIP names

i own ZERO .VIP names.
I didnt even know .VIP was a thing!

My only non-coms are three 1-word dot US.
I have 51 LLLL.com. It’s my favorite niche.

I have 140 domains, of which 137 are .COM.
If it’s 150 domains; 147 are .COM.

I have 140-150 domains at the moment.

 

[Samer]

One more!
AWXR (.)com

 

[Andreas B.]

VRgaming .pro

ARgaming .pro

XRgaming .pro

 

[Andreas B.]

V/R/o/f/f/i/c/e .me

A/R/o/f/f/i/c/e .me

X/R/o/f/f/i/c/e .me

 

[VRdommy]

So, here is an article that really about hits the nail on the head as to where the industry is sitting right now.

Longer but good read. Names can not get ahead of the tech in peoples hands amass.

Skeptical about VR goggles? How Apple and Disney could create the future of entertainment​

https://techxplore.com/news/2023-06-skeptical-vr-goggles-apple-disney.html

 

[NameFu]

Just letting new comers here wondering around.

Just know that there are only 14 reported "goggle" domain sales in the history of domaining (that is a low amount), most of which were for only 3 figures and only *one* was VR related and it likely sold to another domainer. No brand in this industry uses the term "goggles" and no reputable AR/VR media outlets use the term "goggles" to describe headsets. If you go to an AR/VR tech event talking about "goggles" people will think that you're completely new to the industry. This is why I highly advise to never invest in "goggle" domains.

 

[xr reality]

Just letting new comers here wondering around.

Just know that there are only 14 reported "goggle" domain sales in the history of domaining (that is a low amount), most of which were for only 3 figures and only *one* was VR related and it likely sold to another domainer. No brand in this industry uses the term "goggles" and no reputable AR/VR media outlets use the term "goggles" to describe headsets. If you go to an AR/VR tech event talking about "goggles" people will think that you're completely new to the industry. This is why I highly advise to never invest in "goggle" domains.

Yeah i hate the term goggles reminds me that ski should be in-front of it . Glasses is the term for me and the end goal

 

[DT13]

Just letting new comers here wondering around.

Just know that there are only 14 reported "goggle" domain sales in the history of domaining (that is a low amount), most of which were for only 3 figures and only *one* was VR related and it likely sold to another domainer. No brand in this industry uses the term "goggles" and no reputable AR/VR media outlets use the term "goggles" to describe headsets. If you go to an AR/VR tech event talking about "goggles" people will think that you're completely new to the industry. This is why I highly advise to never invest in "goggle" domains.

Once more...
Then I made a top sale, sold Vgoggles.com for 1k

 

[alcy]

yea and especially the singular goggle which is basically an engish abomination... and yet regged in vr both ways... and xr one way i think.. but plural is ok to own.. I'd love too.. people own sheetloads of way worse than vrgoggles or vrgoggles or even vgoggles...

 

[NameFu]

Once more...
Then I made a top sale, sold Vgoggles.com for 1k

Congrats on this long shot extremely lucky sale. You got paid and that's the bottom line, but what's important to note is that this is not a legit "VR" related sale. It's a company using "VR" as a gimmick to sale face mounted video displays, similar to what drone racers use. It's not an interactive headset and more like having a 2000s TV strapped to your face than an actual VR headset. This kind of display is not innovative and has been selling since the 90s. It's not VR or even 360 video compatible. And they're lying about their resolution being UHD when it's only HD(1k pixels per eye). Talk about a blurry piece of trash.

 

[ItsCalled]

Why are you looking at the statistics of the last 6 months when you have the statistics for the last 25 years to judge?

Do you actually think the domain market is the same as it was 15-25 years ago ?

I mean to say many were just acquiring their names and a bit late and there were still plenty of one word domain available for a hand reg. So, now even 2 word names are getting short. Was not a problem 20 years ago.
So I think if you were to actually look back, it adds to the argument not subtract from it.
Old rule of thumb does not hold 'forever'.

Just letting new comers here wondering around.

Just know that there are only 14 reported "goggle" domain sales in the history of domaining (that is a low amount), most of which were for only 3 figures and only *one* was VR related and it likely sold to another domainer. No brand in this industry uses the term "goggles" and no reputable AR/VR media outlets use the term "goggles" to describe headsets. If you go to an AR/VR tech event talking about "goggles" people will think that you're completely new to the industry. This is why I highly advise to never invest in "goggle" domains.

So, it pretty much looks the same as XR ?

 

[NameFu]

Do you actually think the domain market is the same as it was 15-25 years ago ?

I mean to say many were just acquiring their names and a bit late and there were still plenty of one word domain available for a hand reg. So, now even 2 word names are getting short. Was not a problem 20 years ago.
So I think if you were to actually look back, it adds to the argument not subtract from it.
Old rule of thumb does not hold 'forever'.

So, it pretty much looks the same as XR ?

Comparing XR with goggles is a bit ridiculous. There are industry summits, associations, schools, developers and news outlets with "XR" on their brand names. It's not comparable sales wise either. There have been dozens of XR sales, compared to 1 goggle sales. XR has a future and it's usage is only increasing with the growth of the industry. There's zero indication that any other term can compete with it yet. That could change in the future, but XR makes it easy to reference AR MR and VR at the sane time so it's extremely useful. Spatial has potential as well but right now XR is the most used term to reference all terms at once.

I'm not going to debate with anyone about goggles anymore. I think I made my point, redundantly....

 

[ItsCalled]

Comparing XR with goggles is a bit ridiculous. There are industry summits, associations, schools, developers and news outlets with "XR" on their brand names. It's not comparable sales wise either. There have been dozens of XR sales, compared to 1 goggle sales. XR has a future and it's usage is only increasing with the growth of the industry. There's zero indication that any other term can compete with it yet. That could change in the future, but XR makes it easy to reference AR MR and VR at the sane time so it's extremely useful. Spatial has potential as well but right now XR is the most used term to reference all terms at once.

I'm not going to debate with anyone about goggles anymore. I think I made my point, redundantly....

So, XR is a new item as you seem to be insinuating and history is no consideration. But has few end user sales.
Lot of investor sales. Some seem to be using the term, just not really in domains yet.

But One could also say that VR Goggles has no history in domains as well and is a relatively new item.
Just because the word goggle has been around for longer than the internet,
does not mean it's actual application is as old.

I'm not trying to make argument for it. But your argument against it does not hold water.
I would like to hear a better one if "someone else" could make it. Perhaps I am missing something.

 

[NameFu]

So, XR is a new item as you seem to be insinuating and history is no consideration. But has few end user sales.
Lot of investor sales. Some seem to be using the term, just not really in domains yet.

But One could also say that VR Goggles has no history in domains as well and is a relatively new item.
Just because the word goggle has been around for longer than the internet,
does not mean it's actual application is as old.

I'm not trying to make argument for it. But your argument against it does not hold water.
I would like to hear a better one if "someone else" could make it. Perhaps I am missing something.

It's like you didn't even read my reply. I'm not replying about this subject anymore. I wish you good luck with your goggle domains

 

[DT13]

Congrats on this long shot extremely lucky sale. You got paid and that's the bottom line, but what's important to note is that this is not a legit "VR" related sale. It's a company using "VR" as a gimmick to sale face mounted video displays, similar to what drone racers use. It's not an interactive headset and more like having a 2000s TV strapped to your face than an actual VR headset. This kind of display is not innovative and has been selling since the 90s. It's not VR or even 360 video compatible. And they're lying about their resolution being UHD when it's only HD(1k pixels per eye). Talk about a blurry piece of trash.

Nice explanation, but I don't care if It's VR related or not. I don't understand why you go into it so deeply. You are missing the point here, it was about the word goggles and the keyword sales.

 

[NameFu]

Nice explanation, but I just don't understand why you go into it so deeply. You are missing the point here, it was about the word goggles and the keyword sales

You tell me that I'm missing *my* point, and then explain to me the points I made already. You can't make this stuff up. Please guys... Enjoy your goggle domains. I'm not engaging in this convo anymore.

 

[DT13]

You tell me that I'm missing *my* point, and then explain to me the points I made already. You can't make this stuff up. Please guys... Enjoy your goggle domains. I'm not engaging in this convo anymore.

Yes, with all due respect, but your response clearly shows that you don't get it. No problem dude (: but you are right that goggles is a tricky keyword, I agreed with that before.