@NameLlama
Fox News generally is a xenophobic, islamophobic, fear-mongering propaganda machine.
That doesn't mean there isn't some truth in this ugly story. But there are between 1 and 2 billion muslims on the planet โ roughly 1 in 5 people. So it's always possible to cherry-pick bad stories about muslims and use that to indoctrinate and scare conservative Americans.
Don't get duped. Resist the indoctrination.
There are many rly gud Moslems, but this death colt version of Islam is spreading.? What is the awnser?
Can you cite evidence that it's spreading? Or do you only get the IMPRESSION that they're coming to get you because you watch Fox News?
In additionally, the stage is set to make Yurup a Moslem contanint
What are you talking about? What's "Yurup"? Are you trying to spell "Europe"?
Xenophobia is rampant in the USA under Trump โ aimed at Latinos and Muslims. And it's equally bad in parts of Europe, which has absorbed a lot of muslim immigrants, especially since the Syrian civil war. Down here in Latin America, people are bigoted toward Venezuelan immigrants. Xenophobia isn't unique to white people. It's a natural (if lamentable) human tendency to fear foreigners and change.
The USA under Obama botched the handling of Syria. Instead of supporting the progressive resistance movement, the USA stood on the sidelines and let Russia reinforce a mass-murdering dictator. 5 million refugees fled the country โ out of 22 million inhabitants.
And guess which country pretty much locked the doors and refused to help? That's right. The USA. Canada welcomed refugees, albeit in a small way. So did Mexico. European countries also absorbed more of that population. Predictably, many Europeans have been fearful and hostile.
There are always legitimate concerns about absorbing a large influx of new people. Along with paranoia. Either way, Europe isn't going to become a muslim continent. Really, that's absurd.
When I say that's absurd, you have a choice. The lazy option would be to retort in an obstinate, dogmatic, islamophobic way, saying that I don't know what I'm talking about because I've been brainwashed, whereas you can "see the truth". A better option is to look at FACTS:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugees_of_the_Syrian_Civil_War
Those are the stats regarding number of Syrian refugees by country. Unsurprisingly, as you can see, the majority of Syrian refugees (who are Arabic-speaking muslims) went to nearby muslim and/or Arabic-speaking countries:
Turkey 3.5M
Lebanon 2.2M
Jordan 1.3M
Egypt 500k
Iraq 230k
Yemen 100k
UAE 100k
Sudan 100k
Qatar 54k
Algeria 43k
etc.
In Europe, 2 of the most progressive countries had the courage to welcome refugees:
Germany 770k
Sweden 122k
Other than those 2, the numbers are quite small. Like France at 12k. So altogether, about a million refugees went to Europe. Compare that to Europe's overall population of 741.4 million people. And explain to me how Europe will become a Muslim continent based on 1 refugee out of every 742 people. Do you really believe that delusional fear โ which Fox News is constantly spreading โ is rational?
Incidentally, the USA let in about 16k. Considering the U.S. population is roughly half the size of Europe's, doing our part would have implied something more like 500k. And considering the USA has a booming economy, there was no valid concern about our ability to absorb immigrant workers. No, the USA shut the doors out of pure fear and the politics of not wanting to irritate the xenophobes and islamophobes.
We are in the phase where you go from tolerating Muslems, to becoming Moslems. The main Yurupian policymakers are on board with that plane.
No, that's the Fox News paranoia talking again. It's a conspiracy theory on par with believing Mexican immigrants are "rapists and murderers" or that the Earth is flat. As much as you say you're not islamophobic (meaning "fear of Islam"), you sure do fear Islam. Connect the dots.
What are you saying here?
We are in the phase where you go from tolerating Muslems, to becoming Moslems.
Do you mean that this: If society tolerates muslims, then that society must become a muslim society or theocracy?
If that is not what you mean, please explain what you DO mean.
If you DO mean that, then why on earth do you believe it? It seems absurd to me. A pluralistic society should be able to tolerate a religious minority without automatically becoming a theocracy conquered by that religious minority. Why not?
We tolerate other religious minorities in the USA? Do they also pose a risk of conquering us and forcing us to become a theocracy? Or is there something about Islam that you find uniquely threatening?
If society can't tolerate Islam without, sooner or later, being conquered from within by muslims and converted to a theocracy โ which would be a terrible outcome โ then shouldn't the inference be this: Society must NOT tolerate Islam?
On global scales, there are some who expect Romans will shortly merge Roman Catholcism and Islam into Chrislam.
Right. And then the lizard people will tear off their human masks; and, during a dastardly conference call between Mecca and the Vatican, they will chortle about how they deceived humanity for thousands of years about the earth being round, as they drink the blood of human babies.
What can non-Moslems do to prevent more part of the world from being no-go zones as is now happening in UK?
That's just a right-wing conspiracy theory, which Fox News propagates in order to terrify its audience and teach them to hate and fear muslims. It's not true. But like all other conspiracy theories, there is so much content online, that the people who live far away from those supposed "no-go zones" will swallow any lie.
