- Impact
- 1,114
Hi guys,
While I was checking all that VRS (video relay services) stuff, I've found in Wiki the table with a list of VRS providers - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Relay_Service
If you would scroll down you would see the list.
All providers currently use videophones for that services.
In this table there is a category IP Address. If you will look on it, you will see that for example AT&T, Inc. (http://attvrs.com) has IP address - attvrs.tv, ConvoRelay (http://convorelay.com) has convorelay.tv etc. Almost all that .tv domains are taken by that companies who provides VRS, but there are no live websites on .tv.
But when you're using Videophone you need to go to .tv (for example - http://www.ldsvrs.com/).
It means that videophones are working thru .tv domain? or it's not a domain.
So, the question - why? Why no live websites, and why you use .tv when you're calling thru videophone?
Thanks, Nick
While I was checking all that VRS (video relay services) stuff, I've found in Wiki the table with a list of VRS providers - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Relay_Service
If you would scroll down you would see the list.
All providers currently use videophones for that services.
In this table there is a category IP Address. If you will look on it, you will see that for example AT&T, Inc. (http://attvrs.com) has IP address - attvrs.tv, ConvoRelay (http://convorelay.com) has convorelay.tv etc. Almost all that .tv domains are taken by that companies who provides VRS, but there are no live websites on .tv.
But when you're using Videophone you need to go to .tv (for example - http://www.ldsvrs.com/).
It means that videophones are working thru .tv domain? or it's not a domain.
So, the question - why? Why no live websites, and why you use .tv when you're calling thru videophone?
Thanks, Nick







