Dynadot

Virtual Reality Domains (VR)

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Im betting big bucks on VR domains have a great future and with the big boys buying up VR companies, mainstream is a stones throw away.....

Lots of VR+keyword.com taken years ago and I noticed this sale a week or so back -

VRTechnology.com $3688

This was a steel and I can soon see everything from VRPoker / VRCasinos / VRShopping / VRBrowsing / VRTours / VRWorlds / etc etc....having a high price tag even now at the start of VR hitting mainstream...

I have just paid $x,xxx for a name but will not be showcasing as the domain is in escrow at present....

Feel free to showcase your VR domains If you like...

Cheers



Related Thread: Adult Virtual Reality (VR) Discussion
 
Last edited by a moderator:
36
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Just had VR + Keyword sell on afternic BIN

$2499 sorry Hugo :) only paid $15 three weeks ago.


VR portfolio slimming dwn :)

What's left

10 VR + keyword
9 KeywordVR
54 LLLL VR .coms
5 LLL VR .coms


FX

Why did you say sorry to Hugo? Did you buy it from him?
 
0
•••
Out of Escrow.

PupilVR
dot king sold for $3500.

One of my best brandables in my opinion. Pupil's a nice double entendre for the education field.

Congrats my friend,
Great sale!
 
1
•••
3
•••
Out of Escrow.

PupilVR
dot king sold for $3500.

One of my best brandables in my opinion. Pupil's a nice double entendre for the education field.

Great sale!
Private sale? If not, where did you sell it?

Cheers
 
1
•••
2
•••
2
•••
Correct. However we are comparing IndustrialVR not just Industrial. big difference.
Cheers

The VR abbreviation is too generic too, the person who files a UDRP has to 'prove' the current owner owns the domain in bad faith and no one single company (or person) has a right to claim they own the whole 'Industrial Virtual Reality' market, they would just be wasting $1,500.
 
2
•••
The VR abbreviation is too generic too, the person who files a UDRP has to 'prove' the current owner owns the domain in bad faith and no one single company (or person) has a right to claim they own the whole 'Industrial Virtual Reality' market, they would just be wasting $1,500.

Virtual reality is set to emerge as a new trademark battleground, brand owners are warned

Virtual reality app platforms and VR-related domains are two areas where trademark practitioners can take pro-active steps today to ensure that they are all set for the mainstream breakthrough of VR devices in the future.

http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=955a9c25-9eab-483d-9de3-25c22f22d497
 
6
•••
CubesVR
PuzzlesVR
 
Last edited:
4
•••
Virtual reality is set to emerge as a new trademark battleground, brand owners are warned

Virtual reality app platforms and VR-related domains are two areas where trademark practitioners can take pro-active steps today to ensure that they are all set for the mainstream breakthrough of VR devices in the future.

http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=955a9c25-9eab-483d-9de3-25c22f22d497

hopefully someone will find my

VRtrademark.com
VRtrademarks.com


to be the perfect domains for such related matters.

but yes I agree.. we should all be careful with that.. I posted some articles before stating how most common brnads are privately regged as of today by persons not companies, and how mixing VR+brand name is still an unclear area as to whether it violates those companies. the article called it uncharted territory.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Out of Escrow.

PupilVR
dot king sold for $3500.

One of my best brandables in my opinion. Pupil's a nice double entendre for the education field.

wonderful sale for you.
I'd expect this domain to fetch less, right now at least. so congrats on great roi!
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Where would you guys suggest to list vr domains for sale/auction?

Is there any that seem to be having the better sales?
 
0
•••
Great sale!
Private sale? If not, where did you sell it?

Cheers

My domains are listed and hosted by DomainNameSales/Uniregistry. Got an offer through there and negotiated with the assistance of their brokers.
 
3
•••
Virtual reality is set to emerge as a new trademark battleground, brand owners are warned

Virtual reality app platforms and VR-related domains are two areas where trademark practitioners can take pro-active steps today to ensure that they are all set for the mainstream breakthrough of VR devices in the future.

http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/blog/detail.aspx?g=955a9c25-9eab-483d-9de3-25c22f22d497

Very interesting article.

I am convinced that I am not the only one who has names on this VR domain list as 'private entity'.
 
1
•••
0
•••
Very interesting article.

I am convinced that I am not the only one who has names on this VR domain list as 'private entity'.

The only two names on this is that are okay to have in my opinion is MarioVR and AvatarVR. The first a common name and second is a technical term.

All other names on this list are blatant TM ripoffs if they are not owned by their respective TM owners. If you have them, avoid the headache and drop imo.

EDIT: You might be able to get away with BattlefieldVR as well is its a common dictionary word.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
:xf.confused:
2017 will be what we call the winter of VR … especially from an investment standpoint," said Phil Chen, managing partner at Presence Capital, a venture capital fund that focuses on virtual reality start-ups.

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/20/virtual-reality-seen-on-tech-sidelines-in-2017.html

I gotta disagree with this guys opinions. Yes the VIVE and Oculus require high-end PC's, but thanks to the PSVR and VR compatible smartphones, 10's of millions of people around the world will get their first experience of VR over the next week or so.

That's bound to give the industry a massive boost going into 2017.
 
2
•••
VR domains could make a thoughtful christmas gift :xf.wink:
 
0
•••
The only two names on this is that are okay to have in my opinion is MarioVR and AvatarVR. The first a common name and second is a technical term.

All other names on this list are blatant TM ripoffs if they are not owned by their respective TM owners. If you have them, avoid the headache and drop imo.

EDIT: You might be able to get away with BattlefieldVR as well is its a common dictionary word.

I have a couple of VR names that could be associated with games, but they are single dictionary words with multiple uses.
 
0
•••
Very interesting article.

I am convinced that I am not the only one who has names on this VR domain list as 'private entity'.

I see ArkhamVR(.com) directs to the official game website. I wonder if that was hand regged by the company or if they had to get it off a private individual.
 
0
•••
2017 will be what we call the winter of VR … especially from an investment standpoint," said Phil Chen, managing partner at Presence Capital, a venture capital fund that focuses on virtual reality start-ups.

I don't think this article is very far off.

If you really think about it, he is saying that VR will have to get cheaper to really explode; and he is right.

Those headset prices really need to come down over the next 2-3 years... and they will.

So still hold onto your VR domains, try to stay liquid, and plan for a 5 year+ hold. You should be doing that with every domain that you are not intending to 'flip'.

Sure there will be startups that are still trying to get to market, but this 'first to market' rush is pretty much over so new strategies will have to emerge.

It's certainly not a bad thing for VR domains, it just means that you should plan to be patient if you are holding lower tier VR domains.
 
Last edited:
5
•••
The only two names on this is that are okay to have in my opinion is MarioVR and AvatarVR. The first a common name and second is a technical term.

All other names on this list are blatant TM ripoffs if they are not owned by their respective TM owners. If you have them, avoid the headache and drop imo.

EDIT: You might be able to get away with BattlefieldVR as well is its a common dictionary word.

I am a lucid investor when TM refers, mine is the name of a member of this thread that you knows
 
0
•••
I don't think this article is very far off.

If you really think about it, he is saying that VR will have to get cheaper to really explode; and he is right.

Those headset prices really need to come down over the next 2-3 years... and they will.

So still hold onto your VR domains, try to stay liquid, and plan for a 5 year+ hold. You should be doing that with every domain that you are not intending to 'flip'.

Sure there will be startups that are still trying to get to market, but this 'first to market' rush is pretty much over so new strategies will have to emerge.

It's certainly not a bad thing for VR domains, it just mean that you should plan to be patient if you are holding lower tier VR domains.

Agreed.

I had a 5 year plan when I got into this in 2015 (I'm at year 1.5), and though I have to admit that 2016 was a bit slower than I'd expected, everything is actually going perfectly according to the plan. Infrastructure is coming along, people are adopting, companies are noticing, brands are integrating, technology is advancing, and the offers+interest in my VR domains is steadily growing. I actually think my 5 year plan might have the potential to be cut down into a 4 year plan.

So many members of this thread have quality VR names. I think as long as you have a plan of your own, and are focussed on maintaining and curating your portfolio (instead of having a "get rich quick" mindset), there's good reason to be confident in our expectations of a big payout.

No one can predict the future, but we can certainly make a damn good educated guess. ;)
 
Last edited:
10
•••
1
•••
sunniesvr.com

What do you think about it?
 
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back