Hi,
A few weeks ago I listed a website I built for sale on a forum, the site was entirely custom programmed, the sale included 6 domains, the actual site and I also offered to perform any modifications, within reason, when requested.
I found a buyer, received the payment via paypal ($xxx) and started to transfer everything. The domains were: 4 x .net, 1 x .li and 1x .co.uk. the .net's and .li were with moniker. I pushed them all at the same time, however there was a problem transferring the .li, so I contacted moniker support - still awaiting a reply - and the same happened with the .co.uk, so the buyer has 4 out of the 6 domains.
After this I sent the actual site, I zipped up the entire site and then sent it, I helped the buyer install it and configure it. At this point the buyer has 4 out of the 6 domains and the entire script.
The buyer then requests I modify it, as agreed, so I ask what he wants and he explains, what he requested was basically for the entire site to be rewritten, this was well over 20 hours of work, however not to disappoint I agreed.
I had at no point expected this amount of work, I had other projects on which meant I was working through it slowly, an hour or two a day however it was getting done. After a couple of days the buyer opens a paypal dispute claiming I haven't delivered, I repeatedly explain that the work is taking time due to the amount of changes he requested and he continues to complain. After a bit of back and forth he decides to escalate the claim to Paypal.
I am now in the situation where: He has 4 out of the 6 domains, he has the original script and it's all set up + I've spent around 15 hours modifying the site to his new specifications.
What are the chances of paypal deciding in the buyers favour and me losing the domains and site? Should I stop the work and cancel the final 2 transfers of domains and put this down to being a loss, or can I claim against him? Is it morally wrong for me, if I win the dispute, to tell him I'm no longer doing the work and he can keep what he has already?
sorry if this is the wrong section
A few weeks ago I listed a website I built for sale on a forum, the site was entirely custom programmed, the sale included 6 domains, the actual site and I also offered to perform any modifications, within reason, when requested.
I found a buyer, received the payment via paypal ($xxx) and started to transfer everything. The domains were: 4 x .net, 1 x .li and 1x .co.uk. the .net's and .li were with moniker. I pushed them all at the same time, however there was a problem transferring the .li, so I contacted moniker support - still awaiting a reply - and the same happened with the .co.uk, so the buyer has 4 out of the 6 domains.
After this I sent the actual site, I zipped up the entire site and then sent it, I helped the buyer install it and configure it. At this point the buyer has 4 out of the 6 domains and the entire script.
The buyer then requests I modify it, as agreed, so I ask what he wants and he explains, what he requested was basically for the entire site to be rewritten, this was well over 20 hours of work, however not to disappoint I agreed.
I had at no point expected this amount of work, I had other projects on which meant I was working through it slowly, an hour or two a day however it was getting done. After a couple of days the buyer opens a paypal dispute claiming I haven't delivered, I repeatedly explain that the work is taking time due to the amount of changes he requested and he continues to complain. After a bit of back and forth he decides to escalate the claim to Paypal.
I am now in the situation where: He has 4 out of the 6 domains, he has the original script and it's all set up + I've spent around 15 hours modifying the site to his new specifications.
What are the chances of paypal deciding in the buyers favour and me losing the domains and site? Should I stop the work and cancel the final 2 transfers of domains and put this down to being a loss, or can I claim against him? Is it morally wrong for me, if I win the dispute, to tell him I'm no longer doing the work and he can keep what he has already?
sorry if this is the wrong section










