Seabass said:
Have you been reading for the last 10 years what they have been doing to domain owners?
Let's see...Network Solutions let users register domain names for free without
any agreements (last I checked)...then charged $100...then lowered to $70...
then kept generating complaints of record changes via fax, redirecting domain
names to parking pages without their consent, allegedly stole domain names,
let hijacked domain names transfer to other registrars...got sued for sex.com
being given to Cohen without Kremen's consent...was acquired by VeriSign...
which sent unsolicited mailings that later got the FTC's attention...then later
launched SiteFinder...then took it thing down after ICANN sued......settled the
sex.com suit with Cohen...then Network Solutions made a limited free transfer
special which no other registrar did...was sold to Private Pivotal (which later
renamed themselves Nafaji Companies)...then Network Solutions renewed a
couple of Louisiana-based clients' domain names (at no cost to them) due to
Hurricane Katrina (bet some of you didn't know or forgot that)...their VP for
Policy heads the registrar constituency at ICANN...who presented the domain
tasting issue with Go Daddy exectuive Tim Ruiz at an ICANN meeting...stated
recently said why they're doing their current practice, which has turned off a
lot of people...and their CEO Chimp...err, Champ said they'll gladly stop this if
ICANN provides a solution to the domain front running and tasting problems.
I'm forgetting a thing or so, but that ought to show I know more than some of
you folks think I don't, right? Do I really need 10 years to know all that info I
got in my 4+ years of my previous registrar life?
LMK freely if I missed anything to add to my staple of knowledge and history.
And it had better be verifiable.
I'm fully aware many of you hate Network Solutions for whatever reason, and
it's fine. But many of you don't seem to recognize even a remote possibility of
their also being capable of doing something substantial, albeit they are not at
all immune to doing things others consider unethical.
If you folks believe they're doing something illegal, then you know who to tell
about it. But be ready to back it up, or
you risk your own reputation.
Mark said:
No one mistook his post above as Netsols words ....
I guess I'm the only one then. And since I did, I wonder how many other folks
might when people give their own interpretation, which might or might not be
in agreement with NetSol's and can potentially create inaccurate perceptions.
Oh well, I read an article that perception has been more widely accepted than
truth. Unfortunately even that can create unnecessary problems.
BTW, Moniker's site also lets you do bulk search. It's even more than Netsol's.
If you really can't trust any other registrar's, then consider finding or creating
a solution. Opportunities are abound.
Seabass said:
They say, "there is no such thing as bad press", but I wonder in this case if this will hurt them, or just get them branded more.
Awareness about them will grow, that's for sure. Time will tell whether all of it
will be mostly good or bad.
However, my cracked crystal ball tells me they're not going away just because
of this.
Edit: I was recently made aware that one can now contact Network Solutions
and ask that they delete the domain name in question from their reservation
thingie, but to give it 24 hours average.