poll IS DOMAINER GPT THE NEXT STEP?

[MAINNET]

BY DEFINITION:

DOMAINER GPT - An Ai query tool that exists for the sole purpose of providing domain investment insights and guidance.

Is this the next step for domaining and GPT technology? Comment below.

🗣 Mel - QUAD DOMAINS

 

[karmaco]

The absolute basics can be provided by GPT. Things a youngster could figure out.

Human domainers don’t agree on anything, have different investment styles and the most successful don’t divulge their trading secrets on the internet. The info and experience is in human brains. Everything else is conflicting opinions not facts.

So much of what we do involves fine details that make a world of difference and discernment. GPT can’t scrape that off your brain. At least not yet.

They can copy domaining tips disseminated on the internet but it has no way to prove what is hogwash and what is good advice.

AI is allready heavily used on SquadHelp with insights and trends provided but even they only have their own marketplace trends not overall trends of all domain sales.

 

[mdent]

The issue is the limited amount (and quality) of data to train the AI. I would trust an average domainer's judgement more.

 

[MKA]

The problem with GPT is that it programmed to deliver popular (and not necessarily factual) responses.

In fact, let's test it out.

While the advice isn't necessarily bad, it's not particularly useful either. Some of it is even a bit questionable, and could easily be misconstrued by inexperienced domainers.

You could probably summarize the list of criteria for a useful domain on a sheet of paper the size of a business card. Beyond that it's just people determining what a particular domain is worth to them.

 

[Future Sensors]

@QUAD DOMAINS

This current use of Bing AI for choosing a company name is inspirational for domain investors:

https://www.namepros.com/blog/gpt-a...-name-industry.1294704/page-3#comment-8847569

 

[MadAboutDomains]

That bing ai thing I just got access to it. It's a lot worse than chatgpt. Also I don't want something telling me when to "leave it there".

Disappointing compared to gpt even though it's supposed to be based on it and a better version.

 

[MKA]

Disappointing compared to gpt even though it's supposed to be based on it and a better version.

ChatGPT won't give you (specific) financial advice either unless you jailbreak it. I think the reason for that is that Open AI would be liable for bad investment advice and (given the size of the platform) possibly market manipulation.

 

[MadAboutDomains]

ChatGPT won't give you (specific) financial advice either unless you jailbreak it. I think the reason for that is that Open AI would be liable for bad investment advice and (given the size of the platform) possibly market manipulation.

Yeah, I'd question why you would ask it for financial advice though. However, I think Bing have got it into their heads that everyone has to be treated like a baby.

Bring on a version of this technology that doesn't I say.

 

[MKA]

Bring on a version of this technology that doesn't I say.

The problem is that they're legally accountable for what the chat-bot says.

 

[MadAboutDomains]

The problem is that they're legally accountable for what the chat-bot says.

Is that true? Interesting!

 

[MKA]

 

[twiki]

There's a response from ChatGPT going viral around in my country, how to safely preserve and cook cow eggs.

 

[dirk]

They're all rushing things to gain first mover advantage. There's a lot of hype regarding chatgpt. I'm underwhelmed tbh.

AI is a serious matter. Not impressed by the half baked 'products' being released just to get on the train before it takes off.

 

[NickB]

They're all rushing things to gain first mover advantage. There's a lot of hype regarding chatgpt. I'm underwhelmed tbh.

AI is a serious matter. Not impressed by the half baked 'products' being released just to get on the train before it takes off.

There's money to be made so everyone jumps on the bandwagon while it's topical......would be ironic / rather apt if one of these half baked Ai products or one of it's offspring ended up being the cause of human extinction.....

 

[twiki]

There's money to be made so everyone jumps on the bandwagon while it's topical......would be ironic / rather apt if one of these half baked Ai products or one of it's offspring ended up being the cause of human extinction.....

The ironic thing is humans being the designers of their own extinction...

We are intelligent creatures indeed.

 

[Samer]

.

I reported my own post removed; but it seems Namepros is content to let my post stand there to see most dislikes it can get. Thank you all!

I said no, and i stand by my answer.
Elon Musk is making a competitor; and Google Lard too.

 

[MAINNET]

Thank you to everyone that has commented on this thread. There have been some interesting points made to say the least. Here’s our thinking:

Despite AI’s many facets of development, a Domainers GPT isn’t quite far-fetched. Why? It all comes down to “probability and statistics”.

Many of the existing examples of Ai are built atop collections of “data”. Data plays host to “patterns”; which allows “possibility” to be measured/quantified.

Where there’s “possibility”, there’s a thing known as “predictability” that’s associated with many facets of human behavior and activity. Investing included.

Centralized domain investment has numbers and data written into its proverbial DNA. Note how many domain investors rely heavily on “metrics”.

There will come a time where every single domain registration, listing, sale, drop, renewal etc will be leveraged to steer the domain game. By who though?

🛠 Major players in the domain space have a vested interest in launching a tool that will influence domain investing behavior; and thus steer profit-margins.

For example, a service called “DomainerGPT by GoDaddy” is VERY possible. They could easily leverage the trove of investor data they’ve amassed.

Pairing some of the industry’s most notable perspectives from individuals like @bobhawkes with factual domain metrics opens the door to domainergpt.

Remember, at this stage Ai won’t be graded so much on accuracy as it will the ability to appeal to “the sense of familiarity/convenience humans crave”.

Contrary to what some want to believe, domainer GPT is likely already in the works. It’s merely a matter of who will bring it to the space first and how.

Let’s keep the discussion going.

 

[Samer]

I reported my own post removed; but it seems Namepros is content to let my post stand there to see most dislikes it can get. Thank you all!

I said no, and i stand by my answer.
Elon Musk is making a competitor; and Google Lard too.

Google Bard, not Lard! Awful name lol

 

[enterscope]

AI is going to help some domain investors, but the reality is quality domains (mainly single words) have long been gone and you don't need advanced AI to know which words are the most popular.

By the time AI picks up on any new trends, you can believe the innovators have registered those domains already.

 

[MAINNET]

Although it might be convenient to solely consider the “domainer and Ai dynamic”, it’s also worth considering the “registrar and Ai dynamic as well”.

Granted, many domainers won’t deal with Ai UNTIL it’s introduced to them via a medium they have to engage with for the sake of maintaining their portfolio.

Domain marketplace and auction platforms have the most to gain from AI being used in the domain space. It’s “a runway for fine-tuning operations”.

If registrars and other major players incorporate Ai, (which some are doing) domainers will be likely be forced to adapt to the new variable in domaining.

Ai will be intricately woven into registrar’s upselling strategies and customer incentive programs etc. The domains won’t be their primary focus.

AI is going to help some domain investors, but the reality is quality domains (mainly single words) have long been gone and you don't need advanced AI to know which words are the most popular.

By the time AI picks up on any new trends, you can believe the innovators have registered those domains already.