Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

Good or Bad Choice?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

dave9713

carfinanceassistant.co.ukEstablished Member
Impact
7
Last night i had the chance to reg VirginAirlines.com - it was available (just expired) and no one had touched it... natural instinct told me not to get it even though i have never read into TM issues until now however i was very tempted to buy and offer to sell back to them... was it a good choice to leave?

The name is unavailable now!
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
.US domains.US domains
It's in the Pool "hotlist"... real shame they are encouraging cybersquatting behavior...
I would not touch these with a ten-foot pole. You did well if it was available... greed seems to be taking over certain people :)
 
0
•••
dave9713 said:
...however i was very tempted to buy and offer to sell back to them...

Look up the definition of cybersquatting and this is the very first entry. Wise to leave it alone.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
i kind of gathered through common sense it wouldn't be that easy : )
 
0
•••
Has a major corporation ever sued someone like Pool, Snapnames or Sedo for selling or facilitating the sale of its trademarked domain?

If so, what happened? If not, why not?
 
0
•••
I wish they would...
 
0
•••
0
•••
I am very eager to see the outcome of the Vulcan Golf case. It's not hard to see that they are, in fact, profiting off of TMs.. And they hide behind the "automated processes" argument, denying any culpability.

Most of these companies just hit the cruise control button and sit back and watch the profits roll in. It's not a very responsible business model and it's very damaging to the industry overall. What are a few cybersquatters compared to financial behemoths that churn through TM domains like butter?

Enough of these lawsuits come forward and there is going to be some dire consequences to the industry.
 
0
•••
0
•••
Domain Recover
DomainEasy โ€” Payment Flexibility
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back