- Impact
- 162
I know I've read countless decisions on the "companysucks.com" type disputes, where panelists have upheld people's rights to free speech and parody. I know there are specific clauses in the TM law for "Fair Use" in this respect as well. I am however uncertain how far this extends.
For example... Say I had the chance to acquire a domain that was the EXACT TM of a product that a fast food company sells. If my sole intent and use was centered around creating a (non-commercial) site that employs parody and also discusses the harmful effects of fast food, would this be considered free speech or bad faith?
For example... Say I had the chance to acquire a domain that was the EXACT TM of a product that a fast food company sells. If my sole intent and use was centered around creating a (non-commercial) site that employs parody and also discusses the harmful effects of fast food, would this be considered free speech or bad faith?







