discuss Epik vs. Epic and Happy New Year!

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

ThatNameGuy

Account Closed (Requested)
Impact
3,334
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=epik

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=domainer

Just like "domainer" isn't a real word, either is epikO_o However, they both are found in the Urban Dictionary and Wiktionary, thus they're not made up words imho.

Like I have with other key words, I've just started accumulating a portfolio titled; EpikNames.com like; EpikTravel.com, EpikVegas.com and EpikJobs.com

Rob Monster the CEO of Epik.com was the first industry leader I met when I accidentally found the domain industry and the secondary market that Verisign says is "hidden in plain sight".

It's been said, if you want a new idea read an old book, and you may want to think of me as the old book:xf.wink: I found this industry too late to be involved in "one word" domains, but two word domains have become my skill set that I've been told I'm pretty good at, and hopefully getting better.

Now getting back to Epik vs. Epic. As a business person, would you rather own the domain EpicTravel at 20K or EpikTravel at 2K? In my mind it's a No Brainer:xf.rolleyes:, but not so fast old time "domainers" might say? To put things in perspective, I just bought the domain EpikTravel.com from Epik.com for $8 and GD Values it at $1,343 while it Values EpicTravel at $6,455. And while those valuations sound way out of bounds, NameWorth values EpicTravel.com at $9,450 and EpikTravel.com at <less than $500. Furthermore, NameWorth values Epik.com at $64,000 and Epic.com at 10M, that's right ten million dollars:xf.rolleyes:

Finally, and maybe it's just me, but I like "Epik" better than "Epic"....maybe it's that EpikWeed:xf.confused: I've been smoking. What say you?....Happy New Year(y)
 
7
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
OK .. Day 1 2020 .. obviously some bad blood behind us .. but I'd really love for you to understand what I'm trying to say so that you can see that my issues are with the math behind what you say .. and not against you. I do appreciate the fact you finally read one of my posts above .. so I'll try to really make a detailed post to try to explain how I see things and hopefully get you to at least understand what I see from my side.


1 - Before starting with the rest, for YumNames, what I mean by "fine" is that it's a decent brand for a domain marketplace. Not the best name .. but certainly very usable and very far from being the worst. That being said .. it's important to note that I say that keeping in mind that you are the potential end user, not as an investment. Although in all fairness, most such "domainer domains" are challenging to retail because most domainers want domains cheap (even in the ironic case where they should be paying retail prices .. lol). But yeah .. if you launched your marketplace on YumNames.com I most certainly would not challenge that decision .. I have seen much much worse.


2 - As for caring about you .. given the language and accusations you've repeatedly thrown my way over the last 2 years, including starting a group private message with a bunch of industry leaders accusing me of stalking and slandering you, it's very safe to say that your wife can have you! ;) lol


3 - Again .. my posts are not meant to be personal .. it's just that I find your posts to often be potentially harmful to newer members looking to NamePros to learn.

While I think some of your business ideas are indeed crazy, ultimately it isn't even about the specifics of those business development concepts/ideas. For all I know, law of averages says one will pan out .. or maybe you're get an investor and take one of your concepts to the next level. However my big issue is that all these concepts you're talking about is "business development" and not domaining .. the domains you've collected to associate with your "still non-existent business concepts" are effectively worthless on their own. Yet you continue to misrepresent or misunderstand that most of these so called "business concept domains" are valuable, when in fact they are utterly worthless as "domains" outside the scope of your business pitch.

And I'm not saying this to be mean or to single you out .. it's actually a fundamental concept error most domainers face when they start out. PARTICULARLY business dreamers like you and many many others here INCLUDING MYSELF! Heck .. I had domains for 17 years before I actually started actively "domaining" .. so 100% I also made the mistake over the years of collecting domains with the "visions" of fantasy business concepts.

When hunting for domains people say "Oh .. that domain would be perfect for blabla bla type of business" .. and it's so easy to take off and start running with such dreams. But ultimately it's very dangerous as a domainer because of the math and probabilities behind that concept is astronomically challenging (which I've been ever so vigorously trying to explain to you! :) lol


The basics of what I mean is that it's already difficult making a profit with domains with already existing end users. By that I actually specifically mean domains like EpicCondos (with a C .. lol) or PatriotHosting or EmeraldMortgages (all domains I've acquired). Such domains have strong enough adjectives in strong enough industries with enough EXISTING businesses to reach that magic "1% probability of sale at 100x of your average cost".

So in my case let's say I sell 0.5% of such names a year at an average 300x of my average domain cost (combo of acq cost and renewals) .. factor them together and you get 150%, which means I'm making about 50% profit margin a year in profit (150% revenue minus 100% of costs).

But the margin of manoeuvrability is very tight, because as the average desirability factor (again: strong adjective + strong industry combination) goes down, both the % in terms of probability of sale and the potential sales multiple drops off the map very fast .. to numbers as potentially dismal as 0.2% and maybe 50x .. which factors to 10% .. which is effectively an annual loss of 90% (10% revenue minus 100% of your costs).

When it comes to most of the domains we see here at NamePros the unfortunate reality is that even 0.2% is being unrealistically generous. Forget all these abstract enemies of domainers you often talk about .. that almost always overlooked piece of math of "probability of sale" is by FAR the most dangerous and overlooked pitfall of the entire industry.


That ultimately is the problem I have with "concept domains" .. because while good "in demand domains" are already very challenging to make a profit .. "concept domains" have all the existing mathematical challenges that "in demand domains" have .. but then you also have to factor in the very challenging percentage chance that someone also needs to have the same idea that you will have. Because while you came up with 9Time, and for the sake of argument let's even say it was a good idea .. even if it's a good idea, that exact idea and domain name would need to be thought up by somebody else just to be considered "in demand". So that one crucial "someone else has to think about your exact idea" is what effectively obliterates your % probability of sale down to something like 0.01% or even 0%.


That being said .. YES .. if you build out the idea and outbound the idea to business investors, yes .. certainly you can get lucky and sell your business idea. But not only is that active outbound, it's not even outbounding your domains .. it's outbounding your "business concept" .. so it is NOT domaining.


It does not mean your business idea is good or bad .. it just means that what you're doing is not domaining .. and that your domains are effectively worthless without the support of the associated business plan (which in itself is a challenge .. but as I've been trying to say .. that is a discussion for a different forum .. a business development forum perhaps .. lol)! I don't say that to be mean, or because I want you to go (although when you called me an AHole and stalker and slanderer I might have thought that a bit .. lol) .. but it's more just because it simply is not domaining!


Again .. I'm NOT saying your business ideas are bad .. I'm simply saying that your domains are mostly worthless on their own when looking at them from a domainer's standpoint of investability (again, not all of them are bad, but particularly your business concept domains just unfortunately have no domain investment value for DOMAINERS).

I'm not even saying the domains are necessarily bad for the business concepts you're developing .. but for a domainer who is just a domainer .. they are bad investments because of the DOMAINER math.

Your "business development" math might be profitable .. but again .. you are NOT selling domains .. you are doing business development and trying to get investors in the business concept .. not in the domains. The domains are incidental unless they would otherwise be in strong enough demand to be over that "1% at 100x" threshold. Simpli_____.com and Epik_____.com domains unfortunately don't even come close to that threshold .. the probability of sale is way too low (without an associated business concept).


That's really the two biggest problems facing new domainers:

1- Don't get caught up in "build-out" or "business development/concept" fantasies
(unless you actually have the time, money and skills to do it .. but again .. that's not domaining either)

2- The quality of domains actually you need to ever reach "break even" math is SIGNIFICANTLY higher than most newcomers actually think it is.
(1% sales probability at 100x avg cost)

Combine those two factors together and you get a reality that truly sucks as a new domainer .. because it's soooo easy to get caught up in what you think is a cool domain (but instead is actually a cool "concept" .. but you always need to stop and ask .. Are there a lot of potential EXISTING buyers for that domain with big pocket books? Even for most very cool domains, the answer to that question is sadly no! :(


I really hope that helped .. I'm getting really tired of all the frustration .. seriously .. what I say above is genuine .. and my concerns are for everyone who haven't passed those two CRUCIAL "Ah-ha moments" when we come to realise most of what we're doing wrong as new domainers is because of those two problems.

To sum them up again:

1 - Don't get caught up in fantasies
2 - The math behind the hyper-majority of domains is absolutely horrible .. "Good" domains are NOT good enough to be "investable" (even if misleadingly they are indeed "usable") .. you absolutely need to have great to excellent domains (both strong adjective AND in a strong industry with losts of $$$/competition) AND get them at low enough prices to allow for astronomical multiples.


The methods and math can most certainly be different for every domainer. When it comes to the best 5+ figure domains your probability of sale goes way way up .. so in turn you can focus on 5x or 10x type multiple. Because of those two important variables (probability of sale and sales multiple), there actually numerous domaining models you can choose and still be successful .. but the combined factor must always be over 100% of your costs .. otherwise you're going to end up losing money .. "as a domainer"! ;)
 
Last edited:
2
•••
OK .. Day 1 2020 .. obviously some bad blood behind us .. but I'd really love for you to understand what I'm trying to say so that you can see that my issues are with the math behind what you say .. and not against you. I do appreciate the fact you finally read one of my posts above .. so I'll try to really make a detailed post to try to explain how I see things and hopefully get you to at least understand what I see from my side.


1 - Before starting with the rest, for YumNames, what I mean by "fine" is that it's a decent brand for a domain marketplace. Not the best name .. but certainly very usable and very far from being the worst. That being said .. it's important to note that I say that keeping in mind that you are the potential end user, not as an investment. Although in all fairness, most such "domainer domains" are challenging to retail because most domainers want domains cheap (even in the ironic case where they should be paying retail prices .. lol). But yeah .. if you launched your marketplace on YumNames.com I most certainly would not challenge that decision .. I have seen much much worse.


2 - As for caring about you .. given the language and accusations you've repeatedly thrown my way over the last 2 years, including starting a group private message with a bunch of industry leaders accusing me of stalking and slandering you, it's very safe to say that your wife can have you! ;) lol


3 - Again .. my posts are not meant to be personal .. it's just that I find your posts to often be potentially harmful to newer members looking to NamePros to learn.

While I think some of your business ideas are indeed crazy, ultimately it isn't even about the specifics of those business development concepts/ideas. For all I know, law of averages says one will pan out .. or maybe you're get an investor and take one of your concepts to the next level. However my big issue is that all these concepts you're talking about is "business development" and not domaining .. the domains you've collected to associate with your "still non-existent business concepts" are effectively worthless on their own. Yet you continue to misrepresent or misunderstand that most of these so called "business concept domains" are valuable, when in fact they are utterly worthless as "domains" outside the scope of your business pitch.

And I'm not saying this to be mean or to single you out .. it's actually a fundamental concept error most domainers face when they start out. PARTICULARLY business dreamers like you and many many others here INCLUDING MYSELF! Heck .. I had domains for 17 years before I actually started actively "domaining" .. so 100% I also made the mistake over the years of collecting domains with the "visions" of fantasy business concepts.

When hunting for domains people say "Oh .. that domain would be perfect for blabla bla type of business" .. and it's so easy to take off and start running with such dreams. But ultimately it's very dangerous as a domainer because of the math and probabilities behind that concept is astronomically challenging (which I've been ever so vigorously trying to explain to you! :) lol


The basics of what I mean is that it's already difficult making a profit with domains with already existing end users. By that I actually specifically mean domains like EpicCondos (with a C .. lol) or PatriotHosting or EmeraldMortgages (all domains I've acquired). Such domains have strong enough adjectives in strong enough industries with enough EXISTING businesses to reach that magic "1% probability of sale at 100x of your average cost".

So in my case let's say I sell 0.5% of such names a year at an average 300x of my average domain cost (combo of acq cost and renewals) .. factor them together and you get 150%, which means I'm making about 50% profit margin a year in profit (150% revenue minus 100% of costs).

But the margin of manoeuvrability is very tight, because as the average desirability factor (again: strong adjective + strong industry combination) goes down, both the % in terms of probability of sale and the potential sales multiple drops off the map very fast .. to numbers as potentially dismal as 0.2% and maybe 50x .. which factors to 10% .. which is effectively an annual loss of 90% (10% revenue minus 100% of your costs).

When it comes to most of the domains we see here at NamePros the unfortunate reality is that even 0.2% is being unrealistically generous. Forget all these abstract enemies of domainers you often talk about .. that almost always overlooked piece of math of "probability of sale" is by FAR the most dangerous and overlooked pitfall of the entire industry.


That ultimately is the problem I have with "concept domains" .. because while good "in demand domains" are already very challenging to make a profit .. "concept domains" have all the existing mathematical challenges that "in demand domains" have .. but then you also have to factor in the very challenging percentage chance that someone also needs to have the same idea that you will have. Because while you came up with 9Time, and for the sake of argument let's even say it was a good idea .. even if it's a good idea, that exact idea and domain name would need to be thought up by somebody else just to be considered "in demand". So that one crucial "someone else has to think about your exact idea" is what effectively obliterates your % probability of sale down to something like 0.01% or even 0%.


That being said .. YES .. if you build out the idea and outbound the idea to business investors, yes .. certainly you can get lucky and sell your business idea. But not only is that active outbound, it's not even outbounding your domains .. it's outbounding your "business concept" .. so it is NOT domaining.


It does not mean your business idea is good or bad .. it just means that what you're doing is not domaining .. and that your domains are effectively worthless without the support of the associated business plan (which in itself is a challenge .. but as I've been trying to say .. that is a discussion for a different forum .. a business development forum perhaps .. lol)! I don't say that to be mean, or because I want you to go (although when you called me an AHole and stalker and slanderer I might have thought that a bit .. lol) .. but it's more just because it simply is not domaining!


Again .. I'm NOT saying your business ideas are bad .. I'm simply saying that your domains are mostly worthless on their own when looking at them from a domainer's standpoint of investability (again, not all of them are bad, but particularly your business concept domains just unfortunately have no domain investment value for DOMAINERS).

I'm not even saying the domains are necessarily bad for the business concepts you're developing .. but for a domainer who is just a domainer .. they are bad investments because of the DOMAINER math.

Your "business development" math might be profitable .. but again .. you are NOT selling domains .. you are doing business development and trying to get investors in the business concept .. not in the domains. The domains are incidental unless they would otherwise be in strong enough demand to be over that "1% at 100x" threshold. Simpli_____.com and Epik_____.com domains unfortunately don't even come close to that threshold .. the probability of sale is way too low (without an associated business concept).


That's really the two biggest problems facing new domainers:

1- Don't get caught up in "build-out" or "business development/concept" fantasies
(unless you actually have the time, money and skills to do it .. but again .. that's not domaining either)

2- The quality of domains actually you need to ever reach "break even" math is SIGNIFICANTLY higher than most newcomers actually think it is.
(1% sales probability at 100x avg cost)

Combine those two factors together and you get a reality that truly sucks as a new domainer .. because it's soooo easy to get caught up in what you think is a cool domain (but instead is actually a cool "concept" .. but you always need to stop and ask .. Are there a lot of potential EXISTING buyers for that domain with big pocket books? Even for most very cool domains, the answer to that question is sadly no! :(


I really hope that helped .. I'm getting really tired of all the frustration .. seriously .. what I say above is genuine .. and my concerns are for everyone who haven't passed those two CRUCIAL "Ah-ha moments" when we come to realise most of what we're doing wrong as new domainers is because of those two problems.

To sum them up again:

1 - Don't get caught up in fantasies
2 - The math behind the hyper-majority of domains is absolutely horrible .. "Good" domains are NOT good enough to be "investable" (even if misleadingly they are indeed "usable") .. you absolutely need to have great to excellent domains (both strong adjective AND in a strong industry with losts of $$$/competition) AND get them at low enough prices to allow for astronomical multiples.


The methods and math can most certainly be different for every domainer. When it comes to the best 5+ figure domains your probability of sale goes way way up .. so in turn you can focus on 5x or 10x type multiple. Because of those two important variables (probability of sale and sales multiple), there actually numerous domaining models you can choose and still be successful .. but the combined factor must always be over 100% of your costs .. otherwise you're going to end up losing money .. "as a domainer"! ;)

2372 Words for Naught:xf.eek:

Ategy...i'm now back to
not reading your posts, however just for fun this time I counted the number of words in your rant/diatribe about me. You will have to excuse me because I'm still working on a project for HUMANITY that you can read about here; https://www.namepros.com/threads/homelessrx-org-its-not-about-the-money.1169696/#post-7560951https://www.namepros.com/threads/homelessrx-org-its-not-about-the-money.1169696/#post-7560951 that's far more important than anything you can possibly say.


 
0
•••
Good point, you are on your game today (y)

In the same theme....
I write at NamePros
I also write, not as often as I should, at NameTalent
My own domain website is NamesThat.win
One of the registrars I use is NameSilo
And another is Namecheap
I use NameStat quite a lot for statistics
I attended the industry biggest conference NamesCon in 2019
Bob

(Yes, I know I could list contrary like my Twitter is AGreatDomain, I use DomainIQ, DomainTools, etc.). For domainers I think the case can be made domain is better, for general public I agree with @thatNameGuy that Name or Brand is preferred (or plurals).
Bob...ever hear of "spelling reform" seen here; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spelling_reform It's not impossibe, but the fact is, the phonetic pronunciation for Epic is Epik. Check it out on any of the online dictionaries and you're see what I mean. I wonder if Rob will get upset with me if I start an EpikRevolution to change the spelling of Epic to Epik:xf.wink:
 
0
•••
I'm never fully convinced by the radio test, particularly not nowadays.

Firstly, with powerful search engines like Google, people will often whack the name of the company into the search bar rather than go direct to the URL. If you're brand new and haven't been indexed very well, sure... you might miss a few hits. But most people will usually find what they are looking for. If I heard an advert for xero.com (an accounting package), I'd simply Google "zero accounting software" - and guess what comes up top of the page? That's right xero.com!

Secondly, plenty of companies brand under "typos" and do just fine. Xoom.com, xero.com - in a way it's a trade-off. Xoom looks cooler than Zoom and provides a more unique identity than the correct spelling.

Also, I normally come across products online nowadays, rather than on the radio. With social media, instant messaging etc the need to regularly convey a URL verbally is greatly reduced. Not saying it doesn't help, just that it's less important than it was in the 90s. I use imgur.com all the time - no idea whether I pronounce it correctly, but it doesn't matter.

I think if I was starting out I'd go for something that provided a unique brand identity and was easy to remember / catchy. The spelling of the URL and how it might be interpreted verbally I'd think about, but it's a secondary consideration.

I know there are some purists on NP that maintain the importance of the radio test, but I think it's from another era.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
I'm never fully convinced by the radio test, particularly not nowadays.

Firstly, with powerful search engines like Google, people will often whack the name of the company into the search bar rather than go direct to the URL. If you're brand new and haven't been indexed very well, sure... you might miss a few hits. But most people will usually find what they are looking for. If I heard an advert for xero.com (an accounting package), I'd simply Google "zero accounting software" - and guess what comes up top of the page? That's right xero.com!

Secondly, plenty of companies brand under "typos" and do just fine. Xoom.com, xero.com - in a way it's a trade-off. Xoom looks cooler than Zoom and provides a more unique identity than the correct spelling.

Also, I normally come across products online nowadays, rather than on the radio. With social media, instant messaging etc the need to regularly convey a URL verbally is greatly reduced. Not saying it doesn't help, just that it's less important than it was in the 90s.

I think if I was starting out I'd go for something that provided a unique brand identity and was easy to remember / catchy. The spelling of the URL and how it might be interpreted verbally I'd think about, but it's a secondary consideration.

This works for one word domains (like epik.com) but he is talking about misspelled two worders.

You like lyft.com, right? How about easylyft? Terrible, right? Easylift is much better.

He's talking about epik + word which will in no world ever be half as good as epic + word.
 
3
•••
This works for one word domains (like epik.com) but he is talking about misspelled two worders.

You like lyft.com, right? How about easylyft? Terrible, right? Easylift is much better.

He's talking about epik + word which will in no world ever be half as good as epic + word.

I think you have to be a bit more careful, but I think it can still work.

clearbanc.com for example. I think it's actually quite a nice brand - something about the misspelling makes it feel fresh - which is exactly what they are trying to portray as a brand. But yes, there's no hard rule.

Take your Easylyft.com example - yeah, that's a bit clunky. But ezlift.com would be pretty good for a brand in my mind.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
I'm never fully convinced by the radio test, particularly not nowadays.

Firstly, with powerful search engines like Google, people will often whack the name of the company into the search bar rather than go direct to the URL. If you're brand new and haven't been indexed very well, sure... you might miss a few hits. But most people will usually find what they are looking for.

Secondly, plenty of companies brand under "typos" and do just fine. Xoom.com, xero.com - in a way it's a trade-off. Xoom looks cooler than Zoom and provides a more unique identity than the correct spelling.

Also, I normally come across products online nowadays, rather than on the radio. With social media, instant messaging etc the need to regularly convey a URL verbally is greatly reduced. Not saying it doesn't help, just that it's less important than it was in the 90s.

I think if I was starting out I'd go for something that provided a unique brand identity and was easy to remember / catchy. The spelling of the URL and how it might be interpreted verbally I'd think about, but it's a secondary consideration.
Thanks for your thoughtful response. Speaking of misspelling's and typo's, I've always thought about words, and why they aren't spelled like they sound? Then I found this a few minutes ago; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spelling_reform

Wouldn't it be cool:xf.cool: if we could mount a charge to change the spelling of Epic to Epik, or at least have it recognized as an alternative?

Now I'm trying to decide whether to start a SpellingRevolution.com or RevolutionizeSpelling.com

Thanks again and Happy New Year!
 
1
•••
I agree with others that misspelled words are only appropriate for 1 word brand names.

Radio test is very important for brand name of 2+ words. For one word names radio test is less important but if it still contributes to the quality of the name.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
This works for one word domains (like epik.com) but he is talking about misspelled two worders.

You like lyft.com, right? How about easylyft? Terrible, right? Easylift is much better.

He's talking about epik + word which will in no world ever be half as good as epic + word.
In all due respect Lord Antares...i'm sure you would agree there are exceptions to every rule. As an example, I just registered the domain EpikCredit.com that's just as good if not better than EpicCredit.com (which leads to a company known as Epic Credits) for my purposes. Not only is it a better alternative imho....i own it:xf.wink:
 
1
•••
Thanks for your thoughtful response. Speaking of misspelling's and typo's, I've always thought about words, and why they aren't spelled like they sound? Then I found this a few minutes ago; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spelling_reform

Wouldn't it be cool:xf.cool: if we could mount a charge to change the spelling of Epic to Epik, or at least have it recognized as an alternative?

Now I'm trying to decide whether to start a SpellingRevolution.com or RevolutionizeSpelling.com

Thanks again and Happy New Year!

Offtopic but that's language specific. English is weird and words aren't spelled like how they sound. That's why there are such things as misspells.

My mother tongue spells words exactly how they sound and it's impossible to misspell words. That's why spelling bees don't exist here.

We also don't have x (ks), w (v usually) or y (j or i). So I completely understand this point.

That's just a little funfact but this is english so your points cannot be applied here.
 
2
•••
Offtopic but that's language specific. English is weird and words aren't spelled like how they sound. That's why there are such things as misspells.

My mother tongue spells words exactly how they sound and it's impossible to misspell words. That's why spelling bees don't exist here.

We also don't have x (ks), w (v usually) or y (j or i). So I completely understand this point.

That's just a little funfact but this is english so your points cannot be applied here.
Thanks I guess, but what points don't apply? I just said there are exceptions to every rule regardless of the rule?
 
1
•••
1
•••
Thanks I guess, but what points don't apply? I just said there are exceptions to every rule regardless of the rule?

I don't think we quite agree on what the radio test is. Radio test really has nothing to do with domains or radio.

Radio test was invented when the English language was invented. When someone says that some domain doesn't pass the radio test, they are not talking about some arbitrary rule concocted by domainers or business owners.

They are talking about the English language. They are saying that your domain is:

1) mispelled (unprofessional sometimes)
2) incoherent with a good chance of being misspelled and thus losing traffic to the correct spelling.

Yes, brandables are a thing, but they will never be good as exact killer names.

Lyfe.com will never be as good as life.com, gamez.com will never be as good as games.com etc.

While those are good brands on their own, placing them in two word domains strips them off all their value.
 
3
•••
I don't think we quite agree on what the radio test is. Radio test really has nothing to do with domains or radio.

Radio test was invented when the English language was invented. When someone says that some domain doesn't pass the radio test, they are not talking about some arbitrary rule concocted by domainers or business owners.

They are talking about the English language. They are saying that your domain is:

1) mispelled (unprofessional sometimes)
2) incoherent with a good chance of being misspelled and thus losing traffic to the correct spelling.

Yes, brandables are a thing, but they will never be good as exact killer names.

Lyfe.com will never be as good as life.com, gamez.com will never be as good as games.com etc.

While those are good brands on their own, placing them in two word domains strips them off all their value.
Thanks, now I understand. and I appreciate your hanging with me to explain(y)
 
1
•••
https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/epic - note, Epic on the radio really sounds like Epik....OMG!

I've started dozens of businesses in my day, but the first major business I started was Credit Control Corp in 1973 long before the first internet domain was conceived.

So I got to thinking, if I were to start a new business today what would I name it...?
Sounds like you would probably name it Kredit Kontrol Korp. :)
 
2
•••
Sounds like you would probably name it Kredit Kontrol Korp. :)
I'm not quite as dumb as you think I am:xf.rolleyes:, but if you're trying to tag me a racist because of the KKK,
it won't work:xf.wink:
 
0
•••
I'm not quite as dumb as you think I am:xf.rolleyes:, but if you're trying to tag me a racist because of the KKK,
it won't work:xf.wink:
A racist?? No Rich. How does that have any bearing on your topic?

Your preference of Epik over Epic seems to be based on the C sounding like a K. Logic would dictate that any C that sounds like a K should actually be a K. So.... Kredit Kontrol Korp.
 
1
•••
A racist?? No Rich. How does that have any bearing on your topic?

Your preference of Epik over Epic seems to be based on the C sounding like a K. Logic would dictate that any C that sounds like a K should actually be a K. So.... Kredit Kontrol Korp.
At least for me I thought you were being facetious:xf.smile: so I thought I would return the favor:xf.wink:
 
1
•••
Generally a one word misspelled brandable works fine. 2+ words not so much.

I have a domain in .com (Kosmic). It is a good brand as a stand alone, it is even fine adding a word if you are an end user, but for re-sale that is another story.

Brad
 
2
•••
Generally a one word misspelled brandable works fine. 2+ words not so much.

I have a domain in .com (Kosmic). It is a good brand as a stand alone, it is even fine adding a word if you are an end user, but for re-sale that is another story.

Brad
Serioius question Brad and thanks....what if you're only selling to "end users"? For instance, I own EpikMortgage where EpicMortgage is available for resale at Uni for God knows how much? I believe I'm able to get to the owner(s) of Movement Mortgage (a bowel movement?), and they're one of the largest mortgage companies in the US. Keep in mind "if" you like and truly believe in what you're selling, the sale is a whole lot easier. Regardless, thanks for your input(y)
 
0
•••
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back