I was going to leave this but, a few things you said required me to respond,
@Ategy.com
move to get the Word1.Word2 combo only for the sake of complimenting your .com
Yes of course I agree with that. If it is not quality match you should not consider it. But if it was worth paying for Word1Word2.com the combination must, in most cases, also be valuable in Word1.Word2 as a quality match I would argue.
Can you suggest an example where one is a high quality and the other is not to help me see? Like you are saying OnlineCasino.com is valuable, for example, but Online.casino would not be? Or FreeGames.com is a great name, but free.games not so much? Maybe there are examples I just am having trouble thinking of how a two word is great but the shorter direct of the same two words in the same order is a weak name. I am not saying that it will sell for the same, necessarily, but just having trouble seeing why they are not quality.
if you let them easily get the Word1.Word2 combination, they could later come back and buy the .com when they get a bit bigger.
So isn't that an argument to hold the pair? If you are saying hold it, but don't offer them as a pair up front, I think that can be legitimately argued as a bargaining tactic.
What makes you think if China does go that far that they will stop at bifurcating just .com's?
Agreed. But the two extensions under US Dept of Commerce stewardship are most likely to be used as a possible weapon in uncertain times when international agreements seem to be failing, or to be the target of retaliation. I admit it is, hopefully, farfetched.
"suitable" simply isn't enough
I did
not at all mean suitable in the sense you assumed of just okay. I mean suitable in the sense that a
combination could be a legitimate company name. Like an exact match like Simply.fun might be a great phrase, I think it is. But I have trouble seeing it as a company name. Something like Focus Solutions or Sunrise Agency do make sense as suitable company names. That is what I meant by suitable. Not all good marketing phrases are good company names.
any spanning ngTLD acquisitions need to be of "great" to "amazing" spanning domains
Yes, of course. I would hope every new extension domain investor knows that. Certainly many of us have constantly said that
in general new extension need a single word to left of dot that is a great match to the extension to have high potential value. But isn't that true in two word .com? Surely the combination must be great of those two words to likely be valuable?
Remember that I acquire my domains super cheap .. so any ngTLD domains would have heavy acquisition $$ weight within my potentially pairable domains.
There I disagree. Throughout I have talked of cases where you could hand-register at standard rates the matched name.
Are you acquiring at less than $4 (when the effective fee you need pay for extension after the expiry is included)? If not then I don't think your statement is true for year one.
I agree that renewals now, in .com, are less than in most desired new extensions, but not by the factor you are assuming.
A large number of new extensions can be renewed for $15 or less. Multi-year discounts sometimes allow renewals for less than $5 per year. Check a source like DomainCostClub to see the wholesale costs on renewals for some of the more useful company name new extensions, Yes, some are indeed $25 or even $35 but many are $15 and less. The wholesale cost is about $14 on these extensions that often serve as ending of company names .agency, .institute, .international, .ltd, .management, .network, .photography, .pro (legacy), .solutions, .supplies, .supply, .systems, .technology, etc. If you shop for multi-year discounts many of the Radix ones can be found for less as well.
Let's say you are going to do a 3 year trial on a few matches (and well Rob M accountant makes him stop the loss deals
so you have to pay wholesale prices for .com).
3 years of ownership of .com registration at wholesale price to registrar (before the coming price increases) costs $23.55 + ICANN fees. 3 years of .systems at similar wholesale but no other fees cost $32.00 + ICANN fees. Most of the others in the above list are about the same. So yes, higher, but not by the amount that I think you are assuming. Or if you want to just do a one year trial, then it switches and the new extension addition lowers your average cost.
Bob