- Impact
- 9,318
I disagree. I think what makes Yes and Galaxy amazing brandables is that they are not category defining but generic and are suitable for most categories.Usually for domains to sell multi-million (what we thought this sale was) they have to be category defining or amazing brandables (for example Yes dot com, Galaxy dot com).
So what are you disagreeing with me about?I disagree. I think what makes Yes and Galaxy amazing brandables is that they are not category defining but generic and are suitable for most categories.
How much more verification do you want? The CEO of the company, using a verified account made that statement. I do not see it as a joke at all, really reckless of him to think that is a joke.Guys it only sold for 200K. He thought he was being funny saying he paid 2 million. This thread is now on Google forever unless mods delete it.
Good reason not to start these kinds of threads unless a sale amount is verified.
It was a good one tbf, he didn’t tell anyone to write blogs or threads on domaining forums about this ‘supposed’ 2 million sale, but he quickly told the truth what he really paid (even though he didn’t have to). The CEO isn’t a domain investor, chances are he won’t buy another premium domain name again; he doesn’t care what anyone here thinks or Google.How much more verification do you want? The CEO of the company, using a verified account made that statement. I do not see it as a joke at all, really reckless of him to think that is a joke.
Making jokes about financial transactions is something that is a big red flag for investors. 20+ years of working with investment firms, nobody wants to deal with people that are not extremely serious when they talk about numbers. In a post FTX world, that will be even more serious. You might find it cute, you might think everything is a tiktok clown world, but there are some people, including myself that don't think a CEO posting a lie about a transaction is funny at all. This has nothing to do if he plans to buy another domain or not, obviously it doesn't matter for domainers, we sell names to people that pay the price we want. However, there is a world outside of domaining.It was a good one tbf, he didn’t tell anyone to write blogs or threads on domaining forums about this ‘supposed’ 2 million sale, but he quickly told the truth what he really paid (even though he didn’t have to). The CEO isn’t a domain investor, chances are he won’t buy another premium domain name again; he doesn’t care what anyone here thinks or Google.
Rick S says Properties dot com (censored so name or domain does get indexed) is not going to be sold unless someone pays $125m for it, yet most people know this is bullshit and just a domain investor using the power of the internet and indexing to inflate the price of his asset in hope that when someone comes along, offers $5 million and he accepts they think they’ve got a bargain.Making jokes about financial transactions is something that is a big red flag for investors. 20+ years of working with investment firms, nobody wants to deal with people that are not extremely serious when they talk about numbers. In a post FTX world, that will be even more serious. You might find it cute, you might think everything is a tiktok clown world, but there are some people, including myself that don't think a CEO posting a lie about a transaction is funny at all. This has nothing to do if he plans to buy another domain or not, obviously it doesn't matter for domainers, we sell names to people that pay the price we want. However, there is a world outside of domaining.
No harm was done to anyone but to his reputation and the reputation of his company. The way things work in the real world is people do very quick due diligence as a first phase, they come across his clown behavior and for most serious investment firms or others looking to do business, his behavior translates into an "avoid at all costs." Most investment companies manage other peoples money, if they invest or engage with them and it backfires, any amateur lawyer will claim that they should've known from his ridiculous behavior on twitter with what you consider a harmless joke, that he should not be trusted. To you it's all funny, and I am not worried about it. I am posting this so other non domainers that might find this post learn from his mistake. You will never understand it, so you can stop replying with stories that has nothing to do with this topic.Rick S says Properties dot com (censored so name or domain does get indexed) is not going to be sold unless someone pays $125m for it, yet most people know this is bullshit and just a domain investor using the power of the internet to inflate the price of his asset in hope that when someone comes along, offers $5 million and he accepts they think they’ve got a bargain.
Shady tactics like that celebrated on here though, this is ‘purposely’ done because Rick knows bloggers are going to write and it’s going to be posted on forums (free publicity), this guy said $2 million in a tweet not expecting people to write about it and (as said) he quickly tweeted again to say he never paid 7 figures for it and was a joke, me I can take a joke and give the guy credit and say ‘good one’ (he got people going), he never carried it on for months/years, no harm was done, don’t worry about it.
Then why isn't everyone else saying that?No harm was done to anyone but to his reputation and the reputation of his company.
That is a fair point.I would never do business with this guy. Did he ever think of how his “joke” could hurt the seller, considering taxes and what not?
What an asshole and I’d say he’s not a joker but more so a liar!