I literally linked to the site and pointed out there is more than the chart, like the actual report. Which would require you to find it, and read it. 2 things you struggle with. So I will help you this time. I will link and quote. Then you will spend time, doing what you do best. Lying, denying reality. Here we go, and I'll try to make this as simple as possible for you..........
This is the report, this is a link. You click it -
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Did you click it? If so, good job. Now you scroll to the bottom...........
Ok, now I will copy and paste with it says. I will even put it in bold text, highest font available at NP:
| However, there was also a large number of workers who were classified as employed but |
| absent from work. As was the case in March and April, household survey interviewers |
| were instructed to classify employed persons absent from work due to coronavirus- |
| related business closures as unemployed on temporary layoff. However, it is apparent |
| that not all such workers were so classified.
BLS and the Census Bureau are |
| investigating why this misclassification error continues to occur and are taking |
| additional steps to address the issue. |
| |
| If the workers who were recorded as employed but absent from work due to "other |
| reasons" (over and above the number absent for other reasons in a typical May) had |
| been classified as unemployed on temporary layoff,
the overall unemployment rate |
| would have been about 3 percentage points higher than reported (on a not seasonally |
| adjusted basis). However, according to usual practice, the data from the household |
| survey are accepted as recorded. To maintain data integrity, no ad hoc actions are |
| taken to reclassify survey responses.