Dynadot

analysis 2022 Domain Name Sales Slightly Down

Spaceship Spaceship
For each of the last four years, I have looked at NameBio reported domain sales in a number of extensions. The data reflects the situation just after the close of the year. While some sales for the year get reported late, by using a consistent procedure from year to year, the trends should not be significantly biased.

This report is based on 150,400 sales recorded for 2022 in NameBio, with an average price of $1178, and a total dollar volume of just over $177 million.

Over all extensions, 2022 saw a slight dip in both number of sales, down 0.3%, with total sales dollar volume, down 0.9%. Keep in mind that this is a comparison to 2021, which was a very strong year. If we compare to 2020 or 2019, 2022 was higher by both measures.

Many sales, particularly retail sales, are not reported in NameBio. They may be from venues with no reported data, private sales, or sales subject to NDA. Almost all registries no longer report premium sales.

A higher percentage of wholesale transactions are recorded in NameBio, and the mix of wholesale and retail means that one should interpret average prices, and trends in number of domains sold, with caution.

To maintain consistency with past reports, I counted all sales of $100 and up. That means many wholesale acquisitions are included. The total dollar volume is dominated by the higher-price retail sales, so a different cutoff would not influence that much. However, the number of sales is very different if one uses a higher cutoff price.

Since the average price is very sensitive to a few large sales, and the number of sales is strongly influenced by wholesale transactions, the total dollar volume is probably the best indicator of overall strength.

I did computations for 78 different extensions, although not all results were significant enough to be reported here.

.COM
If we consider .com only, the number of reported aftermarket sales decreased by 2.9% in 2022 compared to 2021. A slightly higher average price, $1156 vs $1119 in 2021, meant that the dollar volume increased 0.3%. Shown below is the total sales dollar volume for .com only by year.
IMAGE-COM.png


.NET
The number of sales recorded in NameBio for .net was up 10.2%, but a significantly lower average price ($865 vs. $1278), meant that the total sales dollar volume was down 25.4%, although that was when compared with a relatively strong 2021.

.ORG Keeps Growing
The .org extension is on a slow but steady increase, year by year. When we compare 2022 with 2021, the .org number of sales was up 14.1%, while sales dollar volume was up 19.5%. As we see below, that is a consistent pattern over the last few years.
IMAGE-ORG.png

There were just over twice as many .org sales compared to .net, accounting for about 2.5x the dollar volume.

.INFO
While the market for .info is much smaller, just 441 sales recorded in NameBio over the year, the number of sales was up 10.8% compared to 2021, and the dollar volume up 50%. It still only accounts for only about $282,000 in sales.

.BIZ
Another legacy extension, .biz, was modestly up, 5.1% in number of sales and 4.1 % in dollar volume, but that was based on only 83 sales recorded in NameBio over the year.

.PRO
The .pro extension had a good year, with number of sales more than doubling, 53 in 2021 to 118 in 2022, and the dollar volume up 35.1% year-over-year.

Country Code Extensions Drop
Country code extensions had very strong years in 2020 and 2021, but, overall, suffered a pullback in 2022. There were 3.3% fewer sales in country code extensions reported in NameBio in 2022 compared to 2021. The total dollar volume was down by 24.8%. That needs to be placed within a multiyear picture, however.
IMAGE-AllCountry.png

Some of the more important individual country code extensions are covered below.

.IO Number Up, Dollar Volume Down
The .io extension has become the most important generic country code extension. When we compare 2022 to 2021, the number of sales was up 21.3%, but the dollar volume was down 43.6%. The total dollar volume for the year, at least that recorded in NameBio, was about $2.3 million. Rising renewal costs post challenges to long-term holding of names with low anticipated sell-through rates.

.CO Lags
The past few years have seen great sales in .co, but the momentum faltered in 2022. The number of .co sales was down 36.6%, and the dollar volume down 58.4%. That is partly due to a great 2021, as the multiyear graph below indicates.
IMAGE-CO.png

Not Much Change In .TV
The .tv extension had bounced back in 2021, and held that increase for the most part in 2022, with sales volume up 13.7%, and sales numbers approximately constant. Sales in .tv accounted for just over $509,000 total, in NameBio-reported 2022 sales.

With GoDaddy having taken over managing the extension, it will be interesting to see what unfolds in 2023. I took an in-depth look at the extension recently in the NamePros Blog: The TV Extension: Sales, History, Pricing, Use.

Reported .VC Sales Down
The .vc extension had begun to grow in 2020, and had a stellar 2021. At least in terms of NameBio-reported sales, that momentum was lost in 2022. Compared to 2021, sales volume was down 24.6%, and number of sales down 41.9%. There were 100 NameBio-reported sales in the extension, down from 172 the previous year. One of the key sellers and brokers in .vc does not report sales to NameBio, though, so the full picture could be different.

.DE Dips, But Still Strong
One of the strongest national country-code domain extensions is Germany’s .de. The number of sales in .de dipped by 8.4% in 2022 compared to 2021, and the sales dollar volume fell 19.9%. While the average price of $3783 was still solid, that was down from the previous year.

.ME Drops
The .me extension saw number of sales drop 17.4% year-over-year, and sales dollar volume was down 22.3%, to about $292,000 total.

.IT Up
Italy’s .it is both a strong national country code, and useful for English language expressions across the dot. Although only 54 NameBio-recorded sales in 2022, that was up 42% in number of sales, and 199% higher in sales dollar volume.

.EU Up
The .eu extension only had 87 NameBio-reported sales for 2022, but that was up from 61 in the previous year. The dollar volume was up 19.3% year-over-year. The extension accounted for about $292,000 total sales for the year.

.IN Dollar Volume Up
India’s .in is home to a strongly expanding economy, and, as a bonus, the extension is potentially useful for English language expressions across the dot. While still fewer than 100 NameBio sales reported in the extension in 2022, a drop of 24.4%, the dollar volume was up 31.8% year-over-year, buoyed by a very healthy average price of $4071.

Great Year For .TO
The repurposed .to domain extension had a stellar 2022, with number of sales up 46.8% and sales volume up 86.3%. That may be partly due to more complete reporting, but is still impressive. The 2022 sales volume of about $622,000 was higher than such well known country codes as .tv, .me, .it, .eu, and .gg.

Growth In .CC
The repurposed .cc extension doesn’t get the attention it perhaps deserves. The 327 NameBio-reported sales in the extension in 2022 accounted for about $352,000 in dollar volume. The dollar volume was up 80.1%, while number of sales up 25.8%.

Those investing in the extension should research carefully the type of names that sell, as many, not all, of the sales are in numerics. Last year, I took at a look at what sells in the extension: A Close Look At The CC Domain Extension.

.AI Fell In 2022
At least in terms of NameBio-reported sales, the .ai extension fell year-over-year, both in number of sales and sales dollar volume. This was surprising, as most see a bright future for the extension. The number of sales was down 39.3%, and dollar volume down 23.0%. There were 720 reported sales in the extension for the year, with a total dollar volume of almost $883,000.

.CO.UK Mixed
The .co.uk extension saw 32.7% more sales, but dollar volume dropped 7.1%, based on 142 sales with a total volume of $510,000. There were also 20 NameBio-reported 2022 sales in the .uk extension.

.GG Still In Wings
The .gg extension is popular among a number of domain investors, with obvious application to the gaming community. However, it continues to lag in terms NameBio-reported retail sales. In 2022 there were 229 reported sales, a number investment acquisitions, totalling about $209,000. The number of reported .gg sales is down 25.9%, while the dollar volume down 19.5%.

.US Zooms
The .us extension had a great 2022. The number of sales was up 30.5%, while dollar volume was up even more, 56.2%. NameBio-reported sales in the extension accounted for almost $372,000 in total. The average sales price was a very healthy $1260. The four-year trend for NameBio-reported .us is shown below.
IMAGE-US.png

Many National Country Code Extensions Down
While numbers are small in most cases, and perhaps not very significant, the dollar volume year-over-year was down in a number of national extensions including .ae, .ca, .ch, .cn, .es, and .jp, among others. In some of these cases, the number of sales was up, but the total volume down.

This is somewhat surprising, as other measures, such as registrations and renewal rates, show strong adoption and use in many of the national country codes. It is likely that reporting of aftermarket sales is very inefficient in some of these extensions.

New Domain Extensions
Taken as a whole, aftermarket sales of new domain extensions were up 84.9% in number, from 2055 sales in 2021 to 4725 in 2022. The dollar volume was up 43.2%, to about $7.3 million in 2022. Since 2021 was already a strong year in new extensions, this further increase was impressive. I show the four-year pattern in dollar volume below.
IMAGE-AllNew.png

The rise in new extensions was largely driven by .xyz. Many other new extensions that I tracked were down in dollar volume, including .link, .life, .network, .online and .top. Some of these had increases in number of sales, but not total dollar volume. In the sections below I look at a few new extensions individually.

XYZ Surge Continues
The number of NameBio reported .xyz sales went from 563 in 2021 to 1607 in 2022, an increase of 185.4%, although a number of those were investor acquisitions.

The average price was $2733 in 2022, higher than any of the legacy extensions.

The sales volume in .xyz increased by 131.3%. in 2022. The total sales volume was just shy of $4.4 million. The sales volume trend for .xyz is shown below.
IMAGE-XYZ.png

To put the 2022 dollar volume in perspective, .xyz volume was significantly more than .net, and more than .io and .co combined.

.ART Growth Stalls
A year ago, it seemed that the .art extension was poised for significant growth. Probably due to problems in the NFT world, in 2022 the number of sales in .art was down 3.8% and the dollar volume down 16.5%. If interest in NFTs and art in general picks up again, keep an eye on this extension.

.APP Up
The .app extension has been one of the better performers, and in 2022 the number of sales was up 103.7% and the dollar volume up 22.9%. The extension accounted for just over $436,000 total in 2022, and the average price was $2003.

.CLUB Falters
The .club extension dropped 51.4% in number of sales, and fell 68.2% in sales dollar volume. The rise in .club over the past few years was probably largely due to the popularity of Clubhouse.

.ONE
There are still not many reported sales in .one, just 29 in 2022, but the number of sales and the dollar volume both more than doubled from the previous year. The extension significantly increased renewal rates during the past year. Will be interesting to see how that plays out for the extension. The rates are still not much above the legacy extension rates.

.WORLD
Is .world a sleeper extension? It grew from just 5 reported sales in 2020, to 79 in 2021 and 135 in the most recent year. Dollar volume was up substantially, more than tripling, although keep in mind based on small number statistics.

Other new extensions showing dollar volume growth in 2022 included .dev, .today, .site, .live and .financial.

.COM Domination
The dominance of .com continues. The .com extension accounted for 83.0% of sales by number, and 81.4% by dollar volume. For comparison, in 2021, .com was responsible for 85.2% of sales, and 80.5% of dollar volume.

Taken as a whole, country codes account for 5.9% of the total number of domain sales, and 7.8% of total dollar volume.

Combined, new extensions represent 3.1% of all domain sales, although a higher percentage, 7.8%, by dollar volume.

Notes And Limitations
It is important to keep the following points in mind.
  • Sales from some key parts of the market, such as the brandable marketplaces, are not included in NameBio. Most sales from Afternic and Dan are also not reported. If all retail sales were included, some trends might change significantly.
  • While an increase in sales volume is usually regarded as a positive, it is possible that it is a reflection of investors deciding to liquidate their long-term holdings in that extension.
  • Their company reports indicate many millions of dollars in premium new extension sales by registries that are not included in NameBio.
  • Keep in mind these are numbers as reported just after year close. Some sales are reported to NameBio well after the date of the sale. Because I followed the same procedure each year, there should not be a systematic bias in trends.
  • In some cases, the numbers reported in an extension are relatively small. Therefore percentage changes may not be significant.
What do you think? Please share in the comments what surprised you in the numbers, and what you see as important messages for domain name investors.

If you want to read the similar report from a year ago, here is the link: 2021: Domain Name Sales Very Strong.

Keep in mind that this was a look at the year in total. In most segments of the market, the first half of 2022 was stronger than the second half. A majority of investors are predicting that 2023 will be better than 2022. In a year’s time we will see if they were right.

This is personally one of my favourite posts each year. While numbers and trends alone do not tell you what to invest in, I think it is interesting to look at the sales data, including changes from the previous year. Each year trends emerge that I would not have predicted.


My sincere thanks for NameBio. The superb interface makes it easy to do an analysis such as this one using their data. Thank you. I just analyze and present the data – NameBio do the hard work.
 
Last edited:
63
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Thank you Mr. Bob for this. I had a bearish 2022. I can only hope for a better 2023.
 
Last edited:
5
•••
Great write up Bob

I just love the way .org keeps steadily gaining traction, not the sexiest extension, nor the most fashionable, but it just keeps going and going.....and I see no reason why it won't continue to do well...

If anything with the rise of Web3, Defi etc etc I see it getting stronger for the foreseeable future......

Your analysis from last year put .org at 8% market share for Web3 companies, will be interesting to see how that develops over the course of 2023

https://www.namepros.com/blog/what-names-are-web3-companies-using.1281169/
 
3
•••
Nice report, Bob. Unfortunately the mix of wholesale and retail make a mish mosh of things. For example, rising wholesale prices are likely diluting a year over year decline in retail sales. Have you ever thought of doing an analysis using only data from the primarily retail venues like Sedo, Afternic, BuyDomains, Uniregistry, Domain Mkt, Flippa etc?
 
21
•••
Thank you, Bob, for the excellent work, as always.

I am sure you know how I feel about some of the sales that are probably investors buying wholesale rather than selling for the market value.

Have you tried to exclude those? How 2022 would look vs 2021 sales if you were to exclude GD and other auctions?

I mean for used car sales data you wouldn't include the car auction sales, right? It would be dealership to consumers and consumers to consumers only.
 
10
•••
Informative report, thanks for sharing.

.AI was a little bit hype because machine learning, computer vision, AI tools, etc...
Having unique domain names in dot com will get you more $$$, other gTLD depends on the field (The trend).

2023, you have my attention :tightlyclosedeyes:
 
4
•••
Have you tried to exclude those? How 2022 would look vs 2021 sales if you were to exclude GD and other auctions?
Thanks for your comments and suggestion. No dividing line, based on price or venue, really does that great a job in dividing wholesale from retail. While the number of sales is overwhelmed by the auction venues, and wholesale transactions, the dollar volume does a better job of reflecting the high-value sales that are predominantly retail.

But I did a quick answer to your question. If all GD Auction were excluded from both years, in .com (the TLD by far influenced by the expired auctions) instead of a dollar volume of about constant it would have shown about a 14% drop in 2022 compared to 2021. In other words, increasing numbers of increasing value acquisitions are probably masking a more significant market drop, perhaps. But see also the next part, so maybe not :xf.smile:

I would also point out the analysis which shows that calling all GoDaddy Auctions domainer acquisitions is an oversimplifications. @JudgeMind had noticed how many times auctions he lost, even with very significant bids, were getting quickly used. He did some preliminary numbers and suggested I look at it, which I did independently. You can read the full analysis here, but relevant points are summarized below.

  1. It seems that at least nearly 40% of recent buyers of $4000 plus names at GoDaddy auctions are domain investors.
  2. Something like 35% or more of the buyers appear to either be end users or developers, however.
  3. There are a significant number of unused names that could fall into either category.
Also, I have heard lots of chatter on social media from those who start up companies, not domain investors, on winning names on GoDaddy auctions. I am pretty sure that at GoDaddy, as well as ParkIO and the AI auctions, and to a lesser degree elsewhere, there are probably more end user bidders than one thinks.

What exactly is an end user is difficult to define. If a domain investor has vague plans to develop a name, and buys it, are they an investor or an end user? What about an entrepreneur who buys up about 20x as many names as he/she will reasonably develop, with plans after holding for some time, the ones not developed will sell. The line is fuzzy.

Of course some would also say that a sale is a sale. Should who the buyer is really matter?

Agree that it is a challenging issue. Here, because the dollar volume is the measure that is least influenced by a mix of wholesale and retails, that is what I concentrated on – for example all graphs are that. Perhaps I should have eliminated all mention of average prices and number of sales, since I agree those can be deceptive.

Thank you for your comments and suggestions. I think something can be gleaned from a simple look at dollar volumes from year to year, but agree that it is far from a great metric.

Bob
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Thank you for your comments and suggestion, @Keith DeBoer.

Have you ever thought of doing an analysis using only data from the primarily retail venues like Sedo, Afternic, BuyDomains, Uniregistry, Domain Mkt, Flippa etc?
Indeed I have thought about, and tried, various dividing lines, based on the value of the sale, or on the venues, or a combination of both. I won't repeat all of the arguments I just wrote above in reply to a similar concern expressed by @Recons.Com, but the dividing line is not distinct. There are definitely retail buyers at the auction sites like GoDaddy, in fact significant numbers of them.

But let me directly respond to your suggestion. I think most would agree that the majority of sales at the sites you mention are retail. But there are some issues. For example, you mention Afternic but in all of 2022, all extensions and all dollar values, there are only 104 sales listed as Afternic. That is because they do not report so just a small number of seller reported sales appear. Clearly DomainMarket must sell a boatload of names every year just to break even with renewal costs, but in all of 2022 there are just 12 sales reported in NameBio, and they are definitely not reflective of the overall sales at the site, probably.

There are many more sales listed from BuyDomains and Sedo, and in fact the majority of generally assumed retail sales on NameBio are from them, and private sales. But BuyDomains inventory is principally in two-word .com (yes some exceptions), most of which priced in a. rather narrow window. So their sales will reflect that, and so there is a bias if you based an analysis on a site that sold mainly only a certain kind of domain name in a certain price range. Also, not all of their sales get captured, but only those above a certain price point (that has changed slightly from year to year). They do have domains priced lower, and supposedly sell some, but they are not in the public feed that NameBio uses for the data.

Sedo would be the best source of data, selling a significant number of names in various TLDs. But again there is an issue, in that they only report sales of $2000 plus (excluding cases where privacy purchased). Undoubtedly Sedo have a large number of sales in the $100 to $1999 range, but none of them get reported (except occasionally from an auction or a seller reported). So there is a bias against sales in this price range.

I think it does make sense to use narrower data at times, and I actually have a couple of analyses coming out soon, one looking at what predicts sales price better in which I use only Sedo data, and one that looks at how sales activity changed from month to month using BuyDomains and Sedo data, but if one wants a broad look at all TLDs and a broad range of prices there are problems with using just a few sites.

I absolutely agree that average prices mean little or nothing when one mixes retail and wholesale data (the article notes that). But I do think that using a broad swath and concentrating on sales dollar volume, can be useful, but certainly inexact. As wholesale acquisition prices creep up, the impact becomes more significant each year.

I mean the simple solution is if most retail sales were reported. Until that is true, anything we do is second best. If Afternic, Dan and Sedo data were available, probably you could do everything in this analysis much better using just those sources of data. But from that we have only Sedo $2000+ sales and a tiny smattering from the other two venues.

Thanks again for your suggestion.

-Bob
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I just reread your message again, Keith and
For example, rising wholesale prices are likely diluting a year over year decline in retail sales.
The quick calculation I did in answer to @Recons.Com showed you were exactly right. If you take out all GD Auction sales, there is a decline in .com sales dollar volume in 2022 compared to 2021.

If we extrapolate, it is likely that at least for the legacy extensions that dominate the wholesale market the actual picture is more negative than the article portrays, since as you point out each year has more wholesale acquisitions in the sample.

Thanks again,

-Bob
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Nice report, Bob. Thank you for sharing.
 
3
•••
Thank you for your comments and suggestion, @Keith DeBoer.


Indeed I have thought about, and tried, various dividing lines, based on the value of the sale, or on the venues, or a combination of both. I won't repeat all of the arguments I just wrote above in reply to a similar concern expressed by @Recons.Com, but the dividing line is not distinct. There are definitely retail buyers at the auction sites like GoDaddy, in fact significant numbers of them.

But let me directly respond to your suggestion. I think most would agree that the majority of sales at the sites you mention are retail. But there are some issues. For example, you mention Afternic but in all of 2022, all extensions and all dollar values, there are only 104 sales listed as Afternic. That is because they do not report so just a small number of seller reported sales appear. Clearly DomainMarket must sell a boatload of names every year just to break even with renewal costs, but in all of 2022 there are just 12 sales reported in NameBio, and they are definitely not reflective of the overall sales at the site, probably.

There are many more sales listed from BuyDomains and Sedo, and in fact the majority of generally assumed retail sales on NameBio are from them, and private sales. But BuyDomains inventory is principally in two-word .com (yes some exceptions), most of which priced in a. rather narrow window. So their sales will reflect that, and so there is a bias if you based an analysis on a site that sold mainly only a certain kind of domain name in a certain price range. Also, not all of their sales get captured, but only those above a certain price point (that has changed slightly from year to year). They do have domains priced lower, and supposedly sell some, but they are not in the public feed that NameBio uses for the data.

Sedo would be the best source of data, selling a significant number of names in various TLDs. But again there is an issue, in that they only report sales of $2000 plus (excluding cases where privacy purchased). Undoubtedly Sedo have a large number of sales in the $100 to $1999 range, but none of them get reported (except occasionally from an auction or a seller reported). So there is a bias against sales in this price range.

I think it does make sense to use narrower data at times, and I actually have a couple of analyses coming out soon, one looking at what predicts sales price better in which I use only Sedo data, and one that looks at how sales activity changed from month to month using BuyDomains and Sedo data, but if one wants a broad look at all TLDs and a broad range of prices there are problems with using just a few sites.

I absolutely agree that average prices mean little or nothing when one mixes retail and wholesale data (the article notes that). But I do think that using a broad swath and concentrating on sales dollar volume, can be useful, but certainly inexact. As wholesale acquisition prices creep up, the impact becomes more significant each year.

I mean the simple solution is if most retail sales were reported. Until that is true, anything we do is second best. If Afternic, Dan and Sedo data were available, probably you could do everything in this analysis much better using just those sources of data. But from that we have only Sedo $2000+ sales and a tiny smattering from the other two venues.

Thanks again for your suggestion.

-Bob

Thanks for this, Bob

Yes, I felt like the original result was not matching what I was seeing based on my portfolio of 15k end of 2021 and 24k end of 2022.

Quick observations:

Average sale price went down by about 10% for the sweet spot priced names

Decline in high 4 to low 5 figure sales

Str down by 10-15%

Given the large sample size, I can reasonably expect end user sales to be 10%-25% lower overall.

From discussing with other large portfolio holders, it seems to be a common result.

Excluding gd sales seem to provide some correction. Even if that includes some buys by shrewd end users.
 
12
•••
1
•••
Nice report, Bob. Unfortunately the mix of wholesale and retail make a mish mosh of things. For example, rising wholesale prices are likely diluting a year over year decline in retail sales. Have you ever thought of doing an analysis using only data from the primarily retail venues like Sedo, Afternic, BuyDomains, Uniregistry, Domain Mkt, Flippa etc?
Crunch.id shows a breakdown of wholesale vs retail sales.
 
2
•••
3
•••
Also, I have heard lots of chatter on social media from those who start up companies, not domain investors, on winning names on GoDaddy auctions. I am pretty sure that at GoDaddy, as well as ParkIO and the AI auctions, and to a lesser degree elsewhere, there are probably more end user bidders than one thinks.

What exactly is an end user is difficult to define. If a domain investor has vague plans to develop a name, and buys it, are they an investor or an end user? What about an entrepreneur who buys up about 20x as many names as he/she will reasonably develop, with plans after holding for some time, the ones not developed will sell. The line is fuzzy.
Hi

i think i brought this point up before about trying to associate "wholesale versus retail" sales,
to a domainer or end-user purchase.
domainers budgets are up and end-users are becoming more knowledgeable about aftermarkets.

which adds up to increased competition.

and the line is getting fuzzier.

imo...
 
6
•••
i think i brought this point up before about trying to associate "wholesale versus retail" sales,
to a domainer or end-user purchase.
domainers budgets are up and end-users are becoming more knowledgeable about aftermarkets.
Indeed you did @biggie - thank you. I am slowly coming around to your way of thinking.

The line between wholesale and retail is very fuzzy, and becoming more fuzzy each year.

Thank you,

Bob
 
12
•••
.COM about the same.
.ORG - Up.
.US - Up.

That empirical data aligns with my personal data.

Brad
 
Last edited:
7
•••
Great information, much appreciated
 
3
•••
An important note about Namebio (but just my opinion though):

Indeed is the best source for sales data. However it is also lacking, simply because a good part of the data is not being reported.

The 0.3 % decline in 2022 fails to show what has happened in 2022.

Which is a market shift where the low to middle ground has kinda been wiped out, while very good domains have been stronger and very cheap domains also still sold well.

I can say that our experience here on NP has been mostly different from that minor decline NB has reported. Look at the sales thread for example. What I see lately is NOT what I have seen in the last few years.

The Namebio is again the best source probably, but such results and analysis have to be taken with a BIG grain of salt.

Personal results in 2022:

- bottom tier, DEAD
- low to middle tier = meh
- upper tier = good
- top domains = never better

Overall? Similar sales results but from a much smaller set of my portfolio. But not everyone has had that.

So yeah, it's quite a segmented thing.

Some domainers have had their best year in 2022, but for many, not so much.

Edit: Nevertheless, thanks to @Bob Hawkes for a great analysis! Just to be clear here.
 
Last edited:
4
•••
3
•••
Thank you Bob as always !

.org
.us

Trending upwards! Solid.

.xyz
Sudden pop but trending nicely. Seems to align with web3 trends.
Have had a few nice enduser .xyz sales in 2022.

.ai
.gg

Very interesting extensions with niche backing.
Got an offer on my one and only .gg name in 2022.

Great data, some extensions surprise with me with their sales!
 
3
•••
1
•••
Nice report, Bob. Unfortunately the mix of wholesale and retail make a mish mosh of things. For example, rising wholesale prices are likely diluting a year over year decline in retail sales. Have you ever thought of doing an analysis using only data from the primarily retail venues like Sedo, Afternic, BuyDomains, Uniregistry, Domain Mkt, Flippa etc?
Interesting suggestion, I'm sure it would provide useful information.
 
0
•••
Back