- Impact
- 5
Was this above or below your expectations?
mejcdj said:We will see where we stand the first week of Nov. after the second .mobi auction is done.
snoop said:What period of time is the "long term" term then? This extension had a very good few months from the flowers.mobi auction then sharp declines ever since (around 9 months). I think people are just "drawing a straight line where it suits their argument" to suggest this is still a rising market.
garrett200 said:Anyone who bases anything on flowers.mobi doesn't have a leg to stand on because we all know that sale was a fluke.
Saying prices are falling because they don't live up to flowers.mobi is like saying you can only get rich by winning the lottery.
snoop, I thought at first that you had some valid points, but how can you base the yardstick for 88 domains to follow based on ONE sale by ONE buyer in ONE auction, and then come back and use that to measure every single susequent domain sale? That is nonsense, sorry.
garrett200 said:You want to avoid the fact that many domains sold the other day for mid xx,xxx, and the only way you seem to be able to get around that fact is to go mention how much larger the flowers.mobi sale was. It ain't gonna work, sorry.
The market spoke the other day and it seems that blue horseshoe is starting to like .mobi.
snoop said:...
...There will be 5 and 6 figure .mobi sales in the future but these names are badly under performing the rest of the market - that is what domainers should be concerned with today.
snoop said:The whole auction was flowers.mobi style valuations, fun.mobi (100k), hot.mobi (40k) etc. These aren't the type of valuations that are being seen today. That auction propelled the whole .mobi market (for several months), all the 3 letters went a few days later. To think the that auction didn't reset prices for the .mobi market is foolish.
How am I avoiding the fact that .mobi's sold for mid 5 figures? my point in the market has fallen to where it is at now, 12 months after the auctions that propelled the whole .mobi market and these names seem to be priced more at .info levels, ie the rest of the market has risen strongly whilst .mobi prices for high quality terms have fallen. There will be 5 and 6 figure .mobi sales in the future but these names are badly under performing the rest of the market - that is what domainers should be concerned with today.
garrett200 said:I'm done with this guy. I wasn't trying to convince him of anything anyway, I just wanted to point out the major flaws in his argument for anyone watching.
snoop said:There will be 5 and 6 figure .mobi sales in the future = Seller's Market
snoop said:but these names are badly under performing the rest of the market = Buyer's Market.
A New Extension for a Completetly different Device = A "Brand New Market"
And has No reason to be compared to the Rest of the Market.
NewWorldArk said:There will be 5 and 6 figure .mobi sales in the future = Seller's Market
but these names are badly under performing the rest of the market = Buyer's Market.
NewWorldArk said:And has No reason to be compared to the Rest of the Market.
This is the exact point I was trying to make, but you put it much more eloquently.meegwell said:There is simply very little to compare here. Flowers.mobi is almost-only relevant to flowers.mobi . If it sold for $xxx,xxx a year ago, then for xx,xxx earlier this year, and recently at x,xxx well than yeah, the so-called market for .mobis may be declining.
The most relevant statement made here is the one that said they got all there single word mobi relevant domains for $60. That says the market is up and I see no comparable information to say otherwise.
meegwell said:I think the first thing people must grasp here is that in a way everyone is wrong because there really is no market reliable of producing price points that are meaningful.
...
Mobi Cheap said:Snoop, when was the last time 100 of the best .net keywords were auctioned off in the same hour (using a purely online platform at that)?
snoop said:It will never happen because those names are very tightly held. Basically .mobi is in a glut situation with the high quality names...
....
Mobi Cheap said:Exactly, so aren't we wasting our time trying to compare apples to oranges?
snoop said:No, why would it be a waste of time? We should ignore these sales or pretend they are higher because there is a glut of high quality .mobi's?
That is simply a fact of the market.
Mobi Cheap said:You pick
Clearly, Either would be more informative than pretending these .mobi sales were achieved in circumstances comparable to the circumstances in which your chosen .net examples were achieved.
..hmmm, I really don't really know, but can we get that instated here!??!Reece said:Is there some kind of rule about only 1 skeptic being allowed in the .mobi forum at a time?
Mobi Cheap said:IMHO Snoop may be a more advanced version of Jeff,
meegwell said:I'm sorry, but this is hilarious! :lol: