You quoted demographic characteristics, not reasons.
Single parent = a demographic characteristic, not a reason.
Drug addict = demographic characteristic, not a reason
Young = a demographic characteristic, not a reason
Nulliparous = a demographic characteristic, not a reason
Can’t afford another child = a reason
Afraid abusive partner is going to kill you if they find out you’re pregnant = a reason
Don’t want to have your rapist’s baby = a reason
Mother diagnosed with cancer = a reason
Fetus is missing half of its head = a reason
“Had access problems” however is a reason for not terminating the pregnancy
earlier. That appears to be what they’re addressing.
Third trimester (what we’re talking about - please try and to focus) is even a smaller part of that percentage and performed for medical reasons. Life or health of the mother, fetal abnormalities... those are the legal requirements, with some variation state to state. Do a little more reading on the site you quoted.
The N.Y. bill is not unconditional - it imposes those same restrictions. So your erroneous belief that women will waltz in and demand a 3rd trimester abortion is just your twisted fantasy.
What it doesn’t impose is a time limit, which is already the case in several other states. A time limit makes no sense under those conditions. Mother’s life can be saved if she’s 24 weeks pregnant, but if she’s 27 or 28 weeks, “sorry lady, can’t help ya - buh bye”?
This woman found out about a fatal fetal issue earlier, but this is what the women who have to terminate 3rd trimester go through. Read it and get a little compassion:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10158135288214838&set=a.10150135040894838&type=3&permPage=1
For the earlier abortions done for non medical reasons, back to what I said. Unless BOTH partners want and can afford a baby, don’t risk making a baby. Voila - no unwanted pregnancies! Preach it to your sons, grandsons, guy friends...
