NameSilo

The Ries Report... the future?

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch
Impact
11
http://www.riesreport.com/index.php?month=5

Not from a domain site
Not from a webmaster site
Not from a geek forum
Not from Dotmobi fans
Not from mTLD

This is from hugely respected guys in marketing; google them... this is worth a read / watch.

Mods: Can you monitor this thread please - I will not post again on this thread but please resist any pressure to move this - this is newsworthy!

http://www.riesreport.com/index.php?month=5
 
1
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Unstoppable Domains โ€” AI StorefrontUnstoppable Domains โ€” AI Storefront
Finally got through it all (warning: well worth the 10 minute length!).

Several of his points make alot of sense -- the mobile internet will be an entirely new internet and making "dumbed down" PC sites isn't what will be needed to be successful on this new Internet.

We're going to all have to think long and hard about what a mobile internet user may want to find -- finding other mobile sites as suggested in the video obviously makes alot of sense :)

I really don't think it need be limited to .mobi, however, merely that companies should incorporate some of .mobi's design elements into their website design. Making "iPhone compatible" sites and making sites that everyone can access on their cell phones are two very different things, and I agree that we're a long way from seeing iPhones (and knockoffs) everywhere.

People on the go want immediate access to what they need -- we'll have to rethink how to accomplish that on the mobile internet.

Definitely agree with him -- there will be many more success stories on the mobile web -- just look at Admob for example. I don't think it will be limited to .mobi, however there's no reason to suggest properly developed and marketed .mobis can't share in the success the mobile web achieves.

This still means nothing for the 99% of .mobi domainers who don't develop their .mobis though...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Very interesting and informative. Although, I'm not sure about his assertion that periodicals (magazines) moving to the web will fail. I think it depends on the mag and whether they need to restructure their presentation.
 
0
•••
Profits ... over developed "ecosystem"!

Reece said:
This still means nothing for the 99% of .mobi domainers who don't develop their .mobis though...

^ Agreed ... or will it restore faith in greedy m(:$:)TLD (who are actually - instead of RFP'ing - auctioning even more premium "dot Mobeys" for pure profit and still not enforcing the mandated development requirements from those similarly auctioned over 6 months ago!), or will it address the heightening .MOBI Malaiseโ„ข of now lowered mid - high $Xx sales of once treasured LLL.mobi's! :guilty: :imho:
Tick. Tock.

In the end, and as predicted, developed "dot Mobeys" will be a teeny weeny tiny niche or vanity of the greater - with emerging technologies assisting to concentrate around the .COM's - Mobile Webยฉ, IMHO. :music: :talk:
Thanks for the post, and just my two sense.
-Jeff B-)
 
0
•••
I read a book back in 1998 or so by them called The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding, which said, I believe listed as one of the laws, that generic names and domains would fall by the wayside on the Net and would never be popular, as proper names gained traction over personality-less generics.

I remember thinking they were wrong, and if you judge that book by today's naming standards they were dead wrong on generics.

The book still was an interesting read.
.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Seabass said:
I read a book back in 1998 or so by them called The 22 Immutable Laws of Branding, which said, I believe listed as one of the laws, that generic names and domains would fall by the wayside on the Net and would never be popular, as proper names gained traction over personality-less generics.

I remember thinking they were wrong, and if you judge that book by today's naming standards they were dead wrong on generics.

The book still was an interesting read.
.


I think I can reply to this without fear of being a mobi-zealot as this is almost off-topic.

The book you read does make a point that I can understand; that is that a generic term (such as "Car Rental") is made weaker each time a brand name achieves familiarity..... "Hertz" "Avis" "Enterprise" "Budget" "Easy" etc..

I think generics are strong but I do see where they are coming from when they same names are stronger..... imagine a generic term such as "vacuum cleaner" Would people search for "vacuum cleaner" or "hoover" or "Dyson"?

Interesting subject.
 
0
•••
newdomainer.mobi said:
I think I can reply to this without fear of being a mobi-zealot as this is almost off-topic.

The book you read does make a point that I can understand; that is that a generic term (such as "Car Rental") is made weaker each time a brand name achieves familiarity..... "Hertz" "Avis" "Enterprise" "Budget" "Easy" etc..

I think generics are strong but I do see where they are coming from when they same names are stronger..... imagine a generic term such as "vacuum cleaner" Would people search for "vacuum cleaner" or "hoover" or "Dyson"?

Interesting subject.

Yeah, logic would tend to lead a person to think that way, but there are also countless examples like Hotels.com, News.com, Dog.com, etc..... However, I do think you are probably right about a domain like VacuumCleaner,com as opposed to Hoover, etc.... Maybe there are just cases where one works better than the other and each instance is a unique call.

The book is worth purchasing and reading since it will force you to reanalyze your beliefs in generics.

Anyhow, this is a little off-topic and could turn into a long, long discussion as to which is better........maybe better for another thread. :)
.
 
0
•••
newdomainer.mobi said:
I will not post again on this thread ...

^ Sure, sure ... :red: :lol:

Since the points (generics and โ„ข's) were raised here as part of the discussion, another item that is HUGELY problematic for the floundering "dot Mobey" ... is the complete lack of corporate and End user acceptance - and unique and compelling "on the go" development and its promotion - of these premium/generic domains! :red: :imho:

I'm not talking about the Usual Suspectยฉ defensive โ„ข registrations ... the same ones that keep getting tossed around on the forums as hype and constantly regurgitated as "newsworthy", I'm talking about the pure GENERIC TERMS (all of which were auctioned for profit and remain undeveloped to this day (and well abandoned in the RFP process and/or after the mandated 6-month "development requirement" period), IMHO. :guilty:
This is its future?

Not getting a lot of actual substance from the contents of the posted link! :blink:
Just my two sense.
-Jeff B-)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Its time to start building a billion dollar MobileNet brands. :lala:

For those who came into the domain industry too late when you should had came in 10 years ago, now is your chance to become a billionaire by Mobilenet. 10 years from now if you become the next billionaire, do remember who gave you this advice

:bingo:
 
0
•••
networkmsia said:
For those who came into the domain industry too late when you should had came in 10 years ago, now is your chance to become a billionaire by Mobilenet. 10 years from now if you become the next billionaire, do remember who gave you this advice
Those who have missed on dot com and believe a .mobi is a second gold rush are going to be disappointed IMHO :bah:
 
0
•••
networkmsia said:
Its time to start building a billion dollar MobileNet brands. :lala:

For those who came into the domain industry too late when you should had came in 10 years ago, now is your chance to become a billionaire by Mobilenet. 10 years from now if you become the next billionaire, do remember who gave you this advice

:bingo:
So said .info, .biz , .eu , even now .asia.

Also said the IDNers.

Whose next? .NA? :D :D

The world's richest domainer, Kevin Ham, makes only $350 million a year. Well short of a billion.

Dunno how much elequa makes though.
 
0
•••
Sam said:
So said .info, .biz , .eu , even now .asia.

Also said the IDNers.

Whose next? .NA? :D :D

Considering your sig I find it ironic you are knocking alternative TLD's
 
0
•••
This is how our industry works, and .mobi domainers seem to be following the lead of this "Domain King" for the most part: http://www.namepros.com/domain-name-discussion/470178-domain-king-full-of-youtube.html

It's just like an LLL.com -- you aren't going to get rich off of putting a parking page on an LLL.com, but if you use that LLL.com to make the next CNN.com, well, you just might.

If 90% of .mobi investors on here spent 10% as much time developing as they do arguing, I think we'd see alot more .mobi investors in the black. :imho:
 
0
•••
Reece said:
This is how our industry works, and .mobi domainers seem to be following the lead of this "Domain King" for the most part: http://www.namepros.com/domain-name-discussion/470178-domain-king-full-of-youtube.html

It's just like an LLL.com -- you aren't going to get rich off of putting a parking page on an LLL.com, but if you use that LLL.com to make the next CNN.com, well, you just might.

If 90% of .mobi investors on here spent 10% as much time developing as they do arguing, I think we'd see alot more .mobi investors in the black. :imho:
The op simply posted an informative link. It's the naysayers who
for some reason feel the need to add the negative comments
time and time again. Most are not even vested in the ext. Constructive
criticism is one thing but give it a rest already.

Mobi has shown nothing but forward momentum. It's nice to see links
like the op posted that further back our beliefs!
 
1
•••
Reece said:
This is how our industry works, and .mobi domainers seem to be following the lead of this "Domain King" for the most part: http://www.namepros.com/domain-name-discussion/470178-domain-king-full-of-youtube.html

It's just like an LLL.com -- you aren't going to get rich off of putting a parking page on an LLL.com, but if you use that LLL.com to make the next CNN.com, well, you just might.

If 90% of .mobi investors on here spent 10% as much time developing as they do arguing, I think we'd see alot more .mobi investors in the black. :imho:
The numbers are debatable but in principle I agree Reece. It's why I moved my mobi activities elsewhere, just can't seem to get away from mobi arguments here and wanted my time to be more productive.

It's regrettable so much antagonism exists for .mobi here, interesting perspectives outside the domain world like this Ries Report end up another casualty of the NP mobi flame wars.
 
0
•••
Reece - It's not about arguing - it's about setting the record straight.

Keith - Right on the money !


Just when you thought it was safe (and welcoming) to go back in the water ..... it's baa'aack ...

"... floundering "dot Mobey" ... is the complete lack of corporate and End user acceptance ..."
blah ... blah ... blah ...

Do you realize how ignorant of the facts that statement is? This type of myopic, misinformed ranting has thankfully been missing from this NP forum for a couple weeks. ... until today ... Sorry to see it back in action.

It still puzzles me greatly why someONE can be so bitter and negative about something >>> he has NO real stake in <<< ... and after all that has happened and is happening why he still either ... does NOT UNDERSTAND how .mobi is progressing along. ... OR ... can NOT SEE past his own expectations.

The constant insistence that dotMobi is somehow "greedy" for pursuing their strategy for metering out names above reg fee is laughable. Aside from the premium names ALL other .mobi domains have been and wil be acquired for normal reg fees. Unlike many expensive country codes, .tv, .md, etc the renewal prices for .mobi are modest. This is not a non-profit and it takes money to run an organization that actually does something for the extension.

There is more registry support and energy and developer energy and domainer excitement behind the .mobi extension than any other extension. A vibrant, focused, friendly forum was formed and is growing because of the potential that hundreds of domainers and developers see in this new extension.

So what if the original four names that did not end up being granted via the original RFP process. So what. Auctions were ALWAYS in the plan as one of the possible methods for distributing the names. RFPs are still in the mix. Did you see where dotMobi is looking for someone to run with the find.mobi name? Businesses are flexible and adapt. (Unlike some people evidently.) Premium names are getting into other hands in a metered way. Development is taking place and will continue.

Dot mobi IS progressing. Not everyone has to like it or accept it or even want to see it succeed. And the domainers that prefer other extensions to trade in , fine, the very best of luck to them. After all most of us are invested and active with other extensions as well.

But please take the constant negative attitude and energy somewhere else. That is why most of us do not spend as much time at NP as we used to.

That's my two cents.


PS - Anyone fretting about what .mobi investors are doing with their names regarding development ... ought to take a look at some eye-opening realities. The new youtube "Domain King" video making noise points out how hypocritical big .com investors are with not developing their prime realestate and they are holding the proclaimed KING of extensions.

Consider that the 450,000 LLLL.coms that have been such a hot commodity in domainer circles will at best be parked and almost none will be ever be developed by the domainers holding them. Yet they too will require renewal fees for years to come. That number 450,000 = about half of all the current .mobi registrations out there (approx. 900,000). Add up all the LLL/LLLL/LLLL/LL-L/CCC/CC-C/ in com/net/org/etc and you have far more speculation than in the entire .mobi reggged universe.

So what? All the wailing and gnashing of teeth about mobi investors fretting renewals and not developing and supposedly wasting thier money has to be put in context. Why is it okay for all domainers to speculate to such a great extent in LLL/LLLL/LLLLL/CVCVCV/CCC/etc .com/.net/.org yet somehow unacceptable to reg usable real-world-terms in .mobi.

There are numerous ill-advised "brandable" and low usage real-word names regged in EVERY extension. There are/will be tens of thousands of drops in most EVERY extension EVERY single year. Any one name in any extension CAN BE developed into a useful website.

But some markets will be bigger and will attract more new viewers than others. Mobile IS the new internet frontier at the moment and for the forseeable future. And .mobi is the FIRST and ONLY domain extension specifically introduced to address that HUGE burgeonging market.

That's my additional two cents.
 
0
•••
Now I'm in a real tight position replying to that as both the mobi and short domains mod... :o

As much as I like .mobi, there aren't even close to as many developed .mobis as there are short dotcoms, which average about 25%+ across all categories .

There's very little speculation with short dotcoms... I receive enduser offers every week on my top LLLL.coms and have already had 2 people interested in buying BQB.com prior to developing it.

Short .coms receive traffic -- that makes them less risky an investment by default. I make about $10/week off of my 60 or so LLLL.coms - enough to pay for the renewal fees and essentially make this a risk-free investment moving forward (what you initially paid is sunk afterall).

Being that I used to be a webmaster and developed some domains that were, shall we say, a heck of alot poorer quality than a 1 word generic .mobi, I can say that the "Domain King" and most with his mentality really are trying to sell you shovels to go digging in a mountain filled with very little gold.

You don't need great domain or even a dotcom to make a successful website, you need a great idea and the money to successfully market that great idea.

I'll bet anyone on here right now $10,000 I can take a "useless mobi" and make it top 100k Alexa inside of 3 months. Anyone want to take that bet?

Again, it's about having a great idea, not necessarily a great name. I had a great idea for my BQB.com and turned a name receiving 10 uniques a day into one receiving 500 uniques/day. It's not the name that sold the site, it's the idea I had for the site, how I'm marketing the site (referral contests never hurt!), etc.

MOBILE is the future and that's 100% why I wanted to be the mod of both the .mobi and short domains sections -- it's absolutely 100% positively without a doubt the future imho.

Mobi faithfuls and naysayers alike can choose to hear what they want when listening to the video... As someone who's invested in both short .coms and .mobi to the tune of 5 figures each, perhaps I can provide a more neutral opinion on what was said.

He said that mobile doesn't mean a dumbed down PC site. He said mobile means thinking about new ways to interact with your user. He said mobile will present many opportunities and he believes .mobi will play a role in them.

Who can argue with that? Nowhere in the video did he say that lazy domainers will get rich off parked .mobis.

That's the real question and the only one any "naysayers" are debating I believe. Even people like Jeff who think .mobi is useless will agree with the statement that if you develop your site into something unique and compelling, market it effectively, and provide the visitor with a reason to come back that it's possible to create a successful .mobi website.

You can do that with .com, you can do that with .mobi, you can do that with any extension out there, as the Alexa Top 500 elucidates quite well.

The only real question is how many people who invested in .mobi are willing to do what it takes to make .mobi a success for them and how many expect mtld to do all the work (which I have to agree with Jeff and suggest is a lost cause).

acc said:
Reece - It's not about arguing - it's about setting the record straight.

Keith - Right on the money !


Just when you thought it was safe (and welcoming) to go back in the water ..... it's baa'aack ...

blah ... blah ... blah ...

Do you realize how ignorant of the facts that statement is? This type of myopic, misinformed ranting has thankfully been missing from this NP forum for a couple weeks. ... until today ... Sorry to see it back in action.

It still puzzles me greatly why someONE can be so bitter and negative about something >>> he has NO real stake in <<< ... and after all that has happened and is happening why he still either ... does NOT UNDERSTAND how .mobi is progressing along. ... OR ... can NOT SEE past his own expectations.

The constant insistence that dotMobi is somehow "greedy" for pursuing their strategy for metering out names above reg fee is laughable. Aside from the premium names ALL other .mobi domains have been and wil be acquired for normal reg fees. Unlike many expensive country codes, .tv, .md, etc the renewal prices for .mobi are modest. This is not a non-profit and it takes money to run an organization that actually does something for the extension.

There is more registry support and energy and developer energy and domainer excitement behind the .mobi extension than any other extension. A vibrant, focused, friendly forum was formed and is growing because of the potential that hundreds of domainers and developers see in this new extension.

So what if the original four names that did not end up being granted via the original RFP process. So what. Auctions were ALWAYS in the plan as one of the possible methods for distributing the names. RFPs are still in the mix. Did you see where dotMobi is looking for someone to run with the find.mobi name? Businesses are flexible and adapt. (Unlike some people evidently.) Premium names are getting into other hands in a metered way. Development is taking place and will continue.

Dot mobi IS progressing. Not everyone has to like it or accept it or even want to see it succeed. And the domainers that prefer other extensions to trade in , fine, the very best of luck to them. After all most of us are invested and active with other extensions as well.

But please take the constant negative attitude and energy somewhere else. That is why most of us do not spend as much time at NP as we used to.

That's my two cents.


PS - Anyone fretting about what .mobi investors are doing with their names regarding development ... ought to take a look at some eye-opening realities. The new youtube "Domain King" video making noise points out how hypocritical big .com investors are with not developing their prime realestate and they are holding the proclaimed KING of extensions.

Consider that the 450,000 LLLL.coms that have been such a hot commodity in domainer circles will at best be parked and almost none will be ever be developed by the domainers holding them. Yet they too will require renewal fees for years to come. That number 450,000 = about half of all the current .mobi registrations out there (approx. 900,000). Add up all the LLL/LLLL/LLLL/LL-L/CCC/CC-C/ in com/net/org/etc and you have far more speculation than in the entire .mobi reggged universe.

So what? All the wailing and gnashing of teeth about mobi investors fretting renewals and not developing and supposedly wasting thier money has to be put in context. Why is it okay for all domainers to speculate to such a great extent in LLL/LLLL/LLLLL/CVCVCV/CCC/etc .com/.net/.org yet somehow unacceptable to reg usable real-world-terms in .mobi.

There are numerous ill-advised "brandable" and low usage real-word names regged in EVERY extension. There are/will be tens of thousands of drops in most EVERY extension EVERY single year. Any one name in any extension CAN BE developed into a useful website.

But some markets will be bigger and will attract more new viewers than others. Mobile IS the new internet frontier at the moment and for the forseeable future. And .mobi is the FIRST and ONLY domain extension specifically introduced to address that HUGE burgeonging market.

That's my additional two cents.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Honest and open discussion!

Reece said:
Even people like Jeff who think .mobi is useless will agree with the statement that if you develop your site into something unique and compelling, market it effectively, and provide the visitor with a reason to come back that it's possible to create a successful .mobi website.

... are willing to do what it takes to make .mobi a success for them and how many expect mtld to do all the work (which I have to agree with Jeff and suggest is a lost cause).

^ Yes, yes ... I fully agree and thank you kindly for your true and eloquent words of wisdom, Mr. Reece. :music:
mTLD, unfortunately, has clearly chosen the path to its most immediate :$: profit! :guilty:

acc said:
But please take the constant negative attitude and energy somewhere else. That is why most of us do not spend as much time at NP as we used to.

That's all fine, as from my perspective ... the .MOBI Agendaโ„ข is clearly still alive and kicking from a select and dwindling few - but yet also alive and well - thankfully - is the critical balance and sharing of opinions that #1 Namepros consistently provides its growing membership - whether it be the struggling "dot Mobey", LLLL's, or .TV's or even .NA's or otherwise IMHO. Speaking from years of experience (unbrandable HYPED extensions have come and gone before, folks!), it is a great disservice to domainers (especially new or newer to our profession) - in general - to not be able to freely have this key balance and opportunity to reflect upon all, even opposing, views! :music: :imho:
This restriction occurs elsewhere, sadly. :'(

When I peak under the hood of the "dot Mobey", more questions continue to arise than are ever adequately addressed or answered ... other than the h.y.p.e. and subtle character assassination - as you again witness here - by the regular Usual Suspectsโ„ข (who claim to spend less time here, by the way), IMHO. :red: :snaphappy:

With threads such as this, and it's balance beyond the obvious SPIN & HYPE, I am more proud than ever of our #1 open Communityโ„ข here at Namepros! :hearts:
Thank you, friends!
-Jeff B-)
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Reece said:
Now I'm in a real tight position replying to that as both the mobi and short domains mod...
As much as I like .mobi, there aren't even close to as many developed .mobis as there are short dotcoms, which average about 25%+ across all categories .....
There's very little speculation with short dotcoms... I receive enduser offers every week on my top LLLL.coms and have already had 2 people interested in buying BQB.com prior to developing it.
Reece, the niches you have decided to focus on and the reasoning behind it are valid and have enormous potential. You have contributed greatly to this forum and to the monitoring and promotion of the LLLL.com space. And now you have started BQB.com to provide a service to a segment of the domainer world. You have put your money and lifeblood where your mouth is and work very hard and smart to drive toward your goals. Huge kudos and respect for that.

Where I disagree with you firstly is in your premise that many of the 450,000 LLLL.coms plus all the other CCC/CVCVC/etc in .com/net/org that I referred to previously will be much more than domainer currency for some time to come. I find it hard to believe a stat that 25% of LLLL/CVCVD/CCC/CC-C/LL-L, etc .coms are currently and will ever soon be developed out. As time goes on yes, just like the LLL (3L) .mobis and many of the keyword .mobis will be built out. But in the last year or so they have been snapped up by old and new domainers because they are THE hot item. Look at how many subforums and threads and stickys have been created by domainers asking when the .net LLLL or .org LLLL or .com LLLLL will run out. All trying to get in on THAT next hot run.

And I DO understand and realize and agree that LLLs are a given. Of the other short ones, the LLLL .COMs have the most potential for success and some are drawing nice sales figures. I do see the better ones being used for websites. The same is true of LLL .mobis. Companies and individuals will use LLL acronyms. There have been some end-user nice sales.

But your statement that "there's very little speculation with short dot coms" ????? LLLs maybe, but LLLLS, LLLLLs, CCCCs, etc - come on it's very domainer driven. Again, look at all the new short domain threads.
I am skeptical of non-word acronyms in the other TLDs beyond the LLL level though. Unless someone - as you said - puts the EFFORT into building out the site with whatever name and extension.

The article mentioned in the OP is positive on .the mobile web and mobi's place in it going forward. I agree with that premise.

Other posts referred to the subject of the youtube video which is the big dot com domains are parked and NOT built into productive websites. (Garnering PPC revenue from parked pages can be viewed as a valid business model and is productive from a purely financial aspect as posited by others.) At this early point in the mobile web, .mobi sites (especially ones that do not have PC sized content pages and device detection) are more in need of development to bring in revenue because it is such a new extension. But time will change that as it gains more exposure and acceptance. It is not realistic to expect it or any new extension to be comparable yet to ones that have had a 10 year lead.

My other point is that domains in ALL extensions are oversubscribed versus being developed and will have numerous daily drops. Domainers and non-domainers will continue to reg a lot of future drops. It's like the saying about going out looking for your "future ex-wife". LOL We have all been there, a name/idea sounded good at the time. But the assertion by some that all .mobi domainers are newbies and/or don't know what they are doing is arrogant and shortsighted.

There is a lot of activity by .mobi domainers building sites and branding them. And there are numerous businesses large and small doing just that. Day by day by day there are more sites coming out, just as there are in many extensions. The WHOLE web is growing. dotMobi can surely enjoy a nice slice of that pie. SOME people just REFUSE to acknowledge that progress or ANY progress which is right there in plain daylight. Some people are so stuck on mTLD/early-RFP item that they can not just let go of that one single thing. It is blinding them to the bigger picture and solid progress of a toddler tld.

SomeONE who feels character-assassinated constantly finds the need to bring an anti-mobi./anti-mtld tirade into ANY opening in every thread where someone dares mention the word new TLD or .mobi or have any positive thing to say about it. That is also what I was arguing against. A limited mindset is his own loss but our collective annoyance.

Reece, secondly, I realize that you have been vocally negative on mTLD for a long time. I'm sorry you feel that way. They have not had a perfectly smooth run by any means but one must acknowledge that they do have a gameplan for becoming an integral part of the buildout of the mobile web. They are doing so much on many fronts to provide not only the new .mobi TLD but also tools for ALL developers of ALL extensions to make it easier to building good mobile websites. NO OTHER registry has this type of focus and dedication to their customers and t he industry. NONE. Sure they will make some mistakes and disenfranchise a few domainers along the way. But many domainers want everything handed to them in exactly the way they see it. And there are 1000's of different opinions on how to do something. One thing is undisdputable - dotMobi IS attempting something big. You have to give them credit where credit is due along with criticism when appropriate.

Some people did not like the hold back of premium and reserved names by dotMobi. Some people do not like auctions of these names. There are some people do not like ANYTHING at all that dotMobi does or can EVER do. They just can't let it go that there is a new TLD. Or that running a registry is a business that needs to make money in order to grow and offer services beyond just providing domain registrations. For whatever reason(s) just a few people find a need to be jabbing-jabbing "nattering naybobs of negativity", to quote an ex Vice President. And there are some people who just enjoy tweaking others for fun. That is what I don't understand and yes what sometimes gets me disappointed and frustrated with this forum. I do not go into other subsections of NP and constantly post negative things about those extensions or fellow domainers that believe in them.

Running a business involves making decisions and setting policies and structuring services that not all customers and clients and critics will like or agree with. People can be pretty unreasonable as armchair quarterbacks. Look at the heat Moniker has been taking for TRAFFIC submittal auction terms and commissions, the bashing that SEDO and Afternic take for their shortcomings and errors, or the strong feelings from both directions that EVERY registrar and hosting company draws. You CAN NOT please everybody all the time and in this 24/7/365-blogging/forum world. ALL businesses will draw harsh criticisms, a questioning of their competence, and bashing of their integrity whether it be well founded or not.

I would not be surprised if you will come to view the other side of the mTLD coin at some point down the road now that you are offering a service to this domain industry from the business perspective. Best of luck with BQB.com. And as always, thank you for your work moderating on this forum.

Other than that I have no strong feelings or anything else to say on those topics this evening. ;)

-acc
.
 
0
•••
Al Ries (whoever that is) says dotmobi is the future...it must be true. lol

His 10 minutes is so full of contradictions and holes that I would need the posting limit to type them all.

For those that want to believe what this guys says...go right ahead.

PS - Anyone fretting about what .mobi investors are doing with their names regarding development ... ought to take a look at some eye-opening realities. The new youtube "Domain King" video making noise points out how hypocritical big .com investors are with not developing their prime realestate and they are holding the proclaimed KING of extensions.

And so you use ONE example to make your point? If you didn't notice the domain king is getting a lot of flack here at NP from that video. If you want to use that as an example go ahead because it's that same attitude Schwartz has that some mobi owners have. Delusions of granduer and whatnot.

Mobile IS the new internet frontier at the moment and for the forseeable future. And .mobi is the FIRST and ONLY domain extension specifically introduced to address that HUGE burgeonging market.

That's funny. :) That entire statement is pure conjecture.

People are way overestimating how mobile and internet will mix in the upcoming years.


http://dotmobiz.mobi/mobi-domain-news/blog-bid-76
That's text version of the video for the most part.

Y'know...one has to wonder if mTLD hasn't paid him for consulting.


ADD: Watching more of his videos..interesting guy. He does know his marketing.
 
0
•••
Appraise.net
Escrow.com
Spaceship
Rexus Domain
CryptoExchange.com
Domain Recover
CatchDoms
DomainEasy โ€” Zero Commission
DomDB
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back