You have yet to give a SINGLE cogent argument as to the merits of a single Ron Paul platform argument. Your entire post is that the MSM has a pro-Israel bias. You have not talked about the ramifications of his fiscal policy, his foreign policy or any policy.
The name of the thread is:
RON PAUL - Why is he being ignored?
Only the blind cannot see that the MSM has a pro-Israel bias. I can understand why they are like that. The reason why is just as I said in the very first post. The MSM is controlled by the Jews, who are terrified that Ron Paul may have a good chance of becoming President. I can understand that. If I was a Jew I'd feel exactly the same, especially now with all the turmoil in the Middle East and with some dictators (previously propped up by the US) gone.
But the Media is supposed to inform, to give unbiased news, not choose the candidates and presidents for everyone.
And my point was that one of the fundamental tenets of Ron Paul's platform is that each country should stay out of the affairs of another. I don't need to remind you that Ron Paul has put the root cause of 9-11 firmly at the feet of American foreign policy. His foreign policy would remove ALL foreign aid to ALL countries. His foreign policy would remove all financial contributions to the UN and other bodies like the IMF.
American Foreign policy is highly contested all over the world. Americans are being hated more and more around the world and that's not a good thing for the US, or for the rest of the world.
Contrary to what you may think I'm pro American and pro Israeli. Have always been. Ron Paul makes more sense with his foreign policy than the rest of them combined (and that includes Democrats)
I agree with Ron Paul in stopping foreign aid to everyone.You know why? Because most of that money is used to buying arms, to perpetuate wars and to maintain dictatorships all over the world.
As for the IMF; who cares about them. They are nothing more than a group of powerful, greedy US and European banks who's main intention is to suck the blood out of countries who are in dire need of help. They (IMF) should be extinguished.
My point was that your living in the US for 8 years and feeling some affinity with California doesn't really qualify you much to discuss American affairs (using Ron Paul's criteria). Ron Paul would call that interfering. He would suggest that you would be far better served looking at your own country's policies so that you don't need to seek foreign bailouts in the future (Again). Portugal is one of the PIGS after all.
Ron Paul would be upset that I (a foreigner) am defending his right to be heard? You must be joking surely?
Yes you are right about Portugal. Our corrupt Politicians have put us in the shit we are in. But unfortunately its not only us, as most countries are in big debt thanks to their politicians. The US is no different as they are now dependent on China buying US debt... till one day, when they say; ENOUGH.
If I had my way I'd get a cargo ship, place ALL the Portuguese politicians in containers, drop them off in the Antarctica and leave them there for a minimum of 15 years. I think that would be enough time to refresh their ideas.
As for the Portuguese Media, they are by far 1000 times more democratic and fair than the US MSM. They give all political candidates the same amount of time to explain their ideas and perhaps just as important, they ask Intelligent and relevant questions!
Because Europe isn't a country, I guess. But, I suppose that's part of the problem isn't it.
Sorry, but I tried looking up about "Europe isn't a country" and I just can't find the answer.
Seems more like the type of question that a moderator would ask Ron Paul... irrelevant.
I have not barred you from talking nor has any NP mod. Ron Paul hasn't been censored and ignored - I'm pretty sure that a greater % of voters know he's running and could identify a platform item than they could Rick Santorum.
"RP hasn't been censored and ignored" LOL, thats a good one!
The bottom line though is that you continue to spout Ron Paul is ignored but based on what? What the Ron Paul coalition is telling you! How do I know this? Because the only MSM source you have is CNN! You said that yourself.
Only CNN and the rest I have to scrape from the internet (yahoo, google, NYTimes, Youtube, Politico, Drudge, Huffington etc.) You see I'm forced to look for information because the MSM doesn't give it to me.
Perhaps you could discuss Ron Paul's policies and then we would understand what it is we shouldn't be ignoring. I for one would love to tell our military that Ron Paul will not put their lives at risk in foreign wars ! I'd also love to tell them that they will also be rendered unemployed... that they would not be eligible for any special benefits and that their medical needs would be taken care of by private industry.
How can I discuss Ron Paul's policies when when the MSM keeps ignoring him. The moderators ask stupid irrelevant questions and from what I read or see on the internet and from the 3 debates I've seen on CNN, he gets very little time allocated to him, or he gets asked a stupid question like:
"Would you back Newt Gingrich if he were to win the nomination". These moderators are really pathetic. Don't these puppets of the MSM have the balls to make intelligent questions?
The MSM has too much power and they don't have to answer to anyone.
Thanks for listening and not ignoring me. It's appreciated.
No problem. I believe that's called democracy. Something the MSM has forgotten about for some time.
Oh... I don't suppose that the MSM is covering Ralph Nader's proposal to run against Obama much either. I guess that's a conspiracy too....
Is Ralph Nader running against Obama? I have no idea. Is he?
Stupid Liberal Media and Stupid Conservative Media.
NEVER A TRUER WORD SPOKEN. You hit it on the nail. I agree 1000%. Just for this statement alone I'm going to give you a
"Like" :tu:
Oh BTW I'm still waiting for some John Stewart vids. He's one of my favorite comedians as I do enjoy watching him a lot and I don't care if he's Jewish or not.
