

mods said that before rule not broken and then in pm they said afterward we have to investigate his neg feedback is removed just bcz he reported it separately out of this discussion...@Riz M. I believe you should see the moderator's explanation of why the negative feedback which @IDNKing left you is not removed. You can contend why it was not removed, deal might have been voided but why the negative feedback is still there. As for the possibility that he might be using the account of someone who passed-away( even a family member), the mods said technically no rule is broken and concluded their investigations with that. Other than that, you two would be losing your time arguing with each other.
@MapleDots et tal it is very clear @IDNKing is struggling making his case in English.So I can understand what might cause the confusion. Also, I believe any seller has the right to set when the payment for a sale is made and if it was not communicated prior to reaching an agreement then there should always be an understanding between seller and buyer. @Riz M. could have easily communicated with the buyer and informed him he is travelling and might be late in sending the payment. Remember folks, communication is key in every business and everyday life.
dud u said here alot of time this id was blong to Basel b dir????isnt it????And if admins told u I'm the real registrant of Account basel t Bdair million times I dont mind If u not understand
dude u confirmed Basel b dair was creator of this acct...Again Basel b dir New more name
Sorry I'm out subject now
Hundred names mention by you that I confirm them
Send me only one of the tenth names you are create
Send me one screenshot for any one name
again puk puk puk?????Yaaay 90+ post in this thread by you only today
Where are u here since thread created
U care very much about the community and want to safe it from just 5 minutes later from negative feedback from my side to u
answer simple question and lets close this...Yaaay 90+ post in this thread by you only today
Where are u here since thread created
U care very much about the community and want to safe it from just 5 minutes later from negative feedback from my side to u
Dude... just let me know this account u r using ... its belong to who???? basel bdair???? basel t dair??? or petra??? or abdallah????U just add another negative feedback to me with no deal
U not even respect that admins who remove the old negative feedback in my account
U at least if 1% clever should wait to discuss with admins u plays u dont respect admins, you fight me to the max
I can chat with u anymore kud kid kid and you proved that
operator himself admitted in public that this id is belong to basel bdair and he is basel tdair and abdallahAt this time, we have concluded our initial investigation and were not able to identify any different operators of the thread starters account.
In summary: This deceased member thread was created by the same person they linked to in the first post as being deceased and is currently being operated by the same person that created the account initially and that created this thread.
Our system automatically identifies account matches with 99% accuracy. we have manually double-checked and confirmed the match.
Unfortunately, we don't have a way to verify that the thread starters account has been operated by different people. As you can imagine, we've heard many explanations from people over the years, including that the other account is a relative or friend, and in the majority of those cases, itโs often a single person trying to trick us.
We are not saying that's what's happening here, but as you know, there's really no way for us to determine the difference, so we have to base our decisions on what our technology tells us: which is that the thread starter and current account operator are most likely the same person (not 100% accurate, but as close to it as we can get with technology).
There has not technically been a rule violation, since it's the same person operating the account. It is however, unfortunate that such a situation has occurred involving a sensitive topic of someone passing.
Thanks for alerting us to this matter.
This thread has been moved from industry news to Reviews (Reviewing a person).
They responded here after that PM screen shot you posted. https://www.namepros.com/threads/r-i-p-basel-petra.1123728/page-8#post-7511185 . So I believe case is closed.mods said that before rule not broken and then in pm they said afterward we have to investigate his neg feedback is removed just bcz he reported it separately out of this discussion...
its not that easy...They responded here after that PM screen shot you posted. https://www.namepros.com/threads/r-i-p-basel-petra.1123728/page-8#post-7511185 . So I believe case is closed.
it
its not that easy...
he said himself this id is belong to basel bdair...
and he is abdallah or basel t dair.. why he is using his id???
this case is not closed yet. as here i think he is using old member id and misusing it...
At this time, we have concluded our initial investigation and were not able to identify any different operators of the thread starters account.
In summary: This deceased member thread was created by the same person they linked to in the first post as being deceased and is currently being operated by the same person that created the account initially and that created this thread.
Our system automatically identifies account matches with 99% accuracy. we have manually double-checked and confirmed the match.
Unfortunately, we don't have a way to verify that the thread starters account has been operated by different people. As you can imagine, we've heard many explanations from people over the years, including that the other account is a relative or friend, and in the majority of those cases, itโs often a single person trying to trick us.
We are not saying that's what's happening here, but as you know, there's really no way for us to determine the difference, so we have to base our decisions on what our technology tells us: which is that the thread starter and current account operator are most likely the same person (not 100% accurate, but as close to it as we can get with technology).
There has not technically been a rule violation, since it's the same person operating the account. It is however, unfortunate that such a situation has occurred involving a sensitive topic of someone passing.
Thanks for alerting us to this matter.
This thread has been moved from industry news to Reviews (Reviewing a person).
so he is basel bdair??? basel t dair??? petra??? or abdallah???Read the post of the mods , the parts I colored in red. That is the answer of the mods and that is what matters I believe.
Read the post of the mods , the parts I colored in red. That is the answer of the mods and that is what matters I believe.
What donโt you understand about they determined that the same person that opened this account is the same person that started this thread? Its his account.operator himself admitted in public that this id is belong to basel bdair and he is basel tdair and abdallah
he can use his friend id who is passed away and he is misusing of his id claiming all that he is old member here...
Thanks for this. This is what I am trying to tell @Riz M. It is his account regardless if someone else was the focal for it. I see the account has been renamed to @IDNKingWhat donโt you understand about they determined that the same person that opened this account is the same person that started this thread? Its his account.
The supposed deceased person may have used this account for a period as he claimed they were partners. That was likely a rule violation.
The only question that remains is did the person really die or was that a ploy which the mods have said is out of their scope. I canโt see how anyone with an account in good standing would benefit from posting a fake death.
no he claimed today still that yes basel b dair is passed away and he is basel t dair...What donโt you understand about they determined that the same person that opened this account is the same person that started this thread? Its his account.
The supposed deceased person may have used this account for a period as he claimed they were partners. That was likely a rule violation.
The only question that remains is did the person really die or was that a ploy which the mods have said is out of their scope. I canโt see how anyone with an account in good standing would benefit from posting a fake death.
