Dynadot โ€” .com Transfer

.tv Pondering the .TV market...

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

TeeDot

Established Member
Impact
0
I'm seeing some really good .TV extensions for GREAT search terms....two word combos AT MOST...and many one word "niche" terms.

I'm very tempted to start diving into them. Great immediate ROI value on them and some bangers for long term investment to someone that has that time (not me ....no way)

Is .TV a good move at present day?
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
Biggest complain I hear from non-naysayers...

1) The new competition sucks.

I like "some" .TV.

HIGHLY brandable. HIGHLY usable. HIGHLY affordable.

I don't foresee RICHES as some do but I do foresee GOOD ROI.

I wouldn't necessarily recommend it to jump into unless you have a very clear idea of what you want to accomplish and where you think you can work. Recommend multiyear reg vs multi reg at Name.com if you are going to start.

But WCWIT?
 
0
•••
...Is .TV a good move at present day?

...really depends what you are buying. regardless of extension, one has to maintain a balance of what is good for the name to the right of the dot.

For example, I have many .com names that I would not buy in .tv and I have many .tv names that I have absolutely no interest in its .com sibling.

It is a question of balance in general. Of course, there are exceptions but that is my rule of thumb. Am I wrong? Not for me, and I'm the one that is investing in the portfolio.

Besides, .com is still pretty costly so that leaves a great opportunity for people to cash in on other extensions. Like everything else, time and greed often has a way of collapsing even the strongest of products when they do not change with the times.

That is where YOU have to make your decision.
 
0
•••
I'm seeing some really good .TV extensions for GREAT search terms....two word combos AT MOST...and many one word "niche" terms.

I'm very tempted to start diving into them. Great immediate ROI value on them and some bangers for long term investment to someone that has that time (not me ....no way)

Is .TV a good move at present day?

If you are going to speculate start with a very limited budget, not many make a "Great immediate ROI". I would suggest researching actual auction/forum prices.
 
0
•••
With more than 90 million .COM domain registrations it is practically impossible to find search-phrase keyword .COM domains. I'm sure every month in the drop lists there are some but they are buried among thousandsd and thousands of really bad drops. Going to your local junkyard and try to find something of value is probably going to be a more effective use of your time. On the other hand, the demand for .TV domains and the price one can obtain for them is far less than for the comparable .COM. As well, renewals are much higher. So one has to be far stricter with the type of .TV domain one acquires because the risk is much higher. There are many drops I come across in .TV I would register in .COM and I have even let drop a few .TVs that I might have held in .Net. Ideally the name has some visual component to it - entertainment, sports, a city, etc. I believe products can work well and some services. Certainly the domain should have some commercial value - don't go regging grasshopper.tv just because it has search volume. The competition for .TV drops has picked up considerably this year but there are still some unique opportunities and of course on the forums there are some decent keyword domains that are worth considering.
 
0
•••
I'm seeing some really good .TV extensions for GREAT search terms....two word combos AT MOST...and many one word "niche" terms.

I'm very tempted to start diving into them. Great immediate ROI value on them and some bangers for long term investment to someone that has that time (not me ....no way)

Is .TV a good move at present day?

Read everything you can written by the most respected domainers, i.e. the domain kings, and take the knowledge found in their writings about the .COM extension and use some common sense and creativity and apply it to the .TV extension.

See what you can come up with on your own. I think you will find the answer you are looking for. Remember that not every investment will be a grand slam, but you just need one or two.

Good luck and welcome to the extension.
 
0
•••
Hi, my best wishes if you decided to jump.

For opinion, don't buy because the term has millions of search, but get a name that could utilize/manipulate all those littered videos around to be a useful view in a specified space/term/niche/interest/liking/hobby/knowhow/product.

This is what have gone wrong on some of my purchases, and hope you won't repeat it.

Multi years reg strategy will help to check and balance your financial capacity ass long you don't reg 5 years of shit. What's a shit..... I'm still learning, so get the answer from the pros here.

These is the best place to learn not only .Tv, but almost anything about domain world through some real nice smart guys and girls....since they play the game for a very long, long, time and still doing it.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
still some good opportunities in the market place here
 
0
•••
Multi years reg strategy will help to check and balance your financial capacity ass long you don't reg 5 years of shit. What's a shit..... I'm still learning, so get the answer from the pros here.

Wouldn't suggest this personally, it just compounds the cost of a bad registration. As you state when someone registers a bad domain they won't know it yet (they'll likely find out in a year or two).
 
0
•••
Wouldn't suggest this personally, it just compounds the cost of a bad registration. As you state when someone registers a bad domain they won't know it yet (they'll likely find out in a year or two).

Put it this way. Right now at name.com you can get a 4 year reg for $40. Or a 2 year reg for $20.

This would be less than a one year reg and a renewal at current prices - so finding out in a year or two would be more expensive. Besides, if there is a crap name with 2 years on it, an idiot like me my pick it up for $5 to see if I can move it out of morbid curiousity!

One *assumes* you do some research when buying a name and you're not buying a name with zero potential.

If you don't have some faith in the name to begin with then don't buy it in the first place.

Obviously it is a bad move if the name happens to be a bad one. Or even a good one. Not everything goes as planned.

---------- Post added at 11:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:56 PM ----------

Also. A lot of investors, like yourself, would recommend that you don't play in this market and go with a strong .com in the aftermarket.

I think that is a LOT more daunting for a beginner. Nothing like spending a couple of thousand $ on a dud in one go.

The argument is research. It's risk-reward. It's evaluate your own financial tolerance for loss.
 
0
•••
Put it this way. Right now at name.com you can get a 4 year reg for $40. Or a 2 year reg for $20.

One year at $10.99 is a far better deal than 2 years at $20 or 4 years at $40 given that most of the names registered will end out being dropped and most people are probably buying domains with an expectation of a return greater than 10% annually.

Besides, if there is a crap name with 2 years on it, an idiot like me my pick it up for $5 to see if I can move it out of morbid curiousity!

So someone should spend $9 more because a worst case scenario (in your opinion) is someone might pay $5 for it? That doesn't make sense. They could have let it drop after the year or given it away and been ahead $4.

One *assumes* you do some research when buying a name and you're not buying a name with zero potential.

If you don't have some faith in the name to begin with then don't buy it in the first place.

Right but what does that have to do with registering a name for multiple years? You should have so much faith that you should register something years in advance?

That a bit like taking a girl out on a first date and buying a wedding ring on the way to pick here up. You like her and you think you'll be together forever, if you don't have the faith to make a long commitment upfront don't ask her out in the first place! [/end worthless analogy]

Also. A lot of investors, like yourself, would recommend that you don't play in this market and go with a strong .com in the aftermarket.

I recommend the same thing in all extension, don't register names for multiple years unless it is of definite value (not reg fee names), don't register something and then pick up a whole lot of other extension as well. You are just doubling, tripling, quadrupling your costs. The main place I've seen people recommend this strategy of registering names years in advance is in .tv and I think it is a legacy of ridiculous premium pricing,

The argument went something like this,

"This name might be unaffordable, in a year you could be broke and won't be able to renew, register it for several year in advance to avoid this"

Of course the argument was flawed. The solution wasn't to register for years in advance, the solution was not to register at all!

I think that is a LOT more daunting for a beginner. Nothing like spending a couple of thousand $ on a dud in one go.

Personally I suggest people buy names of definite value when starting our. Start with the auctions, not registering stuff. Registering stuff fresh is for people with a lot of experience in my view because most lose at it, it is like buying land in desert, cheap doesn't aways mean good value.
 
0
•••
Biggest complain I hear from non-naysayers...

1) The new competition sucks.

I personally like "some" .TV.

HIGHLY brandable. HIGHLY usable. HIGHLY affordable.

I don't foresee RICHES as some do but I do foresee GOOD ROI.

I wouldn't necessarily recommend it to jump into unless you have a very clear idea of what you want to accomplish and where you think you can work.

Name.com has a multi-year registration deal you should potentially take advantage of if you think it would personally benefit you.
 
0
•••
Well I wouldn't approach .TV like a .COM....it's a different ball game. I've seen some .TV sites and they have the idea all wrong.

I believe in niches, and I REALLY believe in subniches.....not for a .tv though.

For instance :

www.vintagecars.tv =good
www.musclecar.tv =makes sense

www.makingroyalbluesilkdresses.tv =bad
www.tiedyingpajamas.com = bad

Some of the people I've seen reg .tv are missing the whole point. The .TV extension is obviously going to be for something that people enjoy or can learn from....like "niching" YouTube down to a specific audience. I like the idea.

But NOBODY is going to buy a .tv site or create one if it's TOO niche. I think broad term .TV sites are already being scooped up too much to chase them.

Niche is good, but not too niche, there is only so far you can go with it. Not like the .coms or .nets.

And I think the .tv craze is relying on the fact that future video sites are the next wave. But one has to think about the end user investment into it. I.E. is someone WILLING to run a video sites and gain users or user generated content on a continuous basis?

If so, then I say go for it. If it's just going to be a mirror site for YouTube embeds, there's hardly going to be original 'value' to it.

My Two Cents.
 
0
•••
TeeDot...

If that's your take on it, it's all good. Stay the course. there's plenty of investors with the same as well as other, differing feelings about it, so a lot of room for diverse opinions, and yours is a good one.

Glad you're here to share yours, TD!
 
0
•••
I believe the .tv sites should be utilized ASAP or when HTML5 goes more mainstream then YESSSS, it's going to be a sellers market AND a buyers market.

There is still .TVs to be had though from my day of research I did yesterday.

As soon as I can add some to my portfolio, I'm going into it. Not full bore, just to balance things out in a portfolio.
 
0
•••
Dynadot โ€” .com TransferDynadot โ€” .com Transfer
Appraise.net
Domain Recover
DomainEasy โ€” Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the pageโ€™s height.
Back