

IMO, Susan Boyle regs after her appearance on that show are examples of cybersquatting, not domaining.ababid said:" Britains got talent".. Susanboyle.com ... Also, most of extentions are taken now! What's your thoughts?
NameCharger said:IMO, Susan Boyle regs after her appearance on that show are examples of cybersquatting, not domaining.
NameCharger said:IMO, Susan Boyle regs after her appearance on that show are examples of cybersquatting, not domaining.
NameCharger said:IMO, Susan Boyle regs after her appearance on that show are examples of cybersquatting, not domaining.
MrSpartan said:That is one Big reason why domaining can't gain legitimacy. We need to come out against this kind of registration abuse. And the domain will not have any value in 6-9mos anyway but this will likely get picked up by the press.
siga said:Completely agree names regged after she is famous show total cyber squating. As such gives domainers a bad name.
Regarding the .com regged from 2002, now that is fairly lucky and where the fine line gets very blurry.
NameCharger said:IMO, Susan Boyle regs after her appearance on that show are examples of cybersquatting, not domaining.
-Adam- said:Can someone summarize what or who this is about? I am at work and don't have a whole lot of time to do any research at the moment but this topic looks a little confusing. Why is this person a credit or discredit to domaining?
siga said:nevermind mellowmashers has beat me to it :blink:
-Adam- said:Can someone summarize what or who this is about? I am at work and don't have a whole lot of time to do any research at the moment but this topic looks a little confusing. Why is this person a credit or discredit to domaining?