If NameJet can't efficiently monitor shill bidding, what would give anyone the confidence that NJ could deploy bitcoin as an accepted payment? ie some have called the technology at NameJet archaic...
For years, NameJet has accepted a culture of allowing owners to bid on their own domains. It seemed that some users were bidding on their own domains just to track their auctions. When shill bidding allegations broke out last year, some cited NJ's archaic technology to seemingly defer the intent of bidding on your own NJ auction. It would appear NJ developers have their hands full trying to develop techniques to combat their rampant shill bidding problem, rather than branch out to allow a form of anonymous payment.
Nothing against BTC, I just think NameJet has harvested a culture of questionable behavior (possibly due to their archaic tech) and accepting BTC could be like throwing gas on the flames... Not just with shill bidding, but with stolen domains. There have been reports of
stolen domains being sold at NameJet. If the
seller was paid in BTC, it would be a lot
tougher to track, and as such, this form of payment
could further ignite criminal activity.
Hey
@ScottPruitt -- I'm surprised NameJet still has a NamePros presence. Are you aware of this thread?
https://www.namepros.com/threads/bidding-on-your-own-names-at-namejet.1030874/
There are currently 64 pages of feedback.
My suggestion is that NameJet audits their past auctions, and issues refunds to everybody that was shilled up.
Does NameJet really think the problem will go away if they just sweep it under the rug?