This time, rather than using the
default theme, we made our own. Developers who spent about a year on it are reading this thread. You're welcome to criticize it, but you need to do so in a professional manner. I did repeatedly warn the developers that they would receive a lot of harsh words no matter what they did, but I didn't expect anyone to go so far as to say they "raped" the design.
I'm not blaming your [NP's] developers, it's clear that they're already trying so hard to do it like it was on many aspects. At this point, what I see is that most of the problems so far looks more like it's caused by the [3rd party's] software & it's new awful limitations, so I don't see why I should blame your [NP's] developers.
Sorry for the very "unprofessional language", but when it comes to coding/software-related issues like this, I can no longer mince my words. I see a new trend where more and more coders find joy in making their users suffer through very bad UX & UI "updates" (or what I call "rapedates"), proven by F---Fox's mobile app with their now-deleted tweet (it's still archived somewhere but I forgot the link) showing (indirectly) how they enjoyed seeing their mobile users get angry, and
F---Book promoting anger provoking posts, among many others. It is as if the coding culture changed from being responsible coders to simply blaming everything on users, and indirectly sending the message "be a coder or be forever bullied by coders".
If someone chooses to zoom out on their device, that's their prerogative, and they were able to do that on the old theme.
Choosing is one thing, being pushed to do so, whether directly or indirectly is another whole different issue. If more and more people feel like they need to zoom out, then the impact on sigs will be very clear & very bad.
We'll likely enforce a minimum contrast in the near future.
It doesn't allow you to vote as many times you want. The more established you are, the more you're able to vote.
@Paul
Please remove these UP/DOWNarrow buttons, where you can give/deduct as many points you want.
Or as outcome: we will get the absolutely fake stats.
Well,
@Jurgen Wolf , if you w
Ant to remove the
BUtton
S, I b
Elieve you should know what to do now
This place is slowly becoming reddit-ish. Time for some karma whoring
LOL the old members might use it responsibly. The new ones who like to troll, I highly doubt it'll be used responsibly.
You’re in control.
You may be thankful that someone shared their opinion but also dislike the way they presented it. Then a “Thanks” and -1 makes sense.
But keep in mind you don’t have to use it any differently than before. The previous functionality still exists: it’s called Automatic mode, and it’s the default.
For that, I suggest adding this button instead - "Thanks, I hate this" or "Angry upvote"
***
More: I just noticed when typing that if 2 quoted posts are back-to-back, if the last sentence of the 1st quoted post is deleted, the first sentence of the 2nd quoted post "jumps" to the 1st quote. Also if I click on the empty line just above a quoted post and hit delete key in an attempt to delete the line, the first sentence of the quoted post "jumps" to the empty line instead of deleting the line. It seems that the [3rd party] software makers couldn't even bother to think of desktop users.
And another: Search for PM content now takes more clicks and more time, needing to go through Advanced Search > Search conversations before you can even > input anything (and it's a separate page to load each time).
And more: Extra bumps are no longer worth it. Non-auction sales threads will only last for max 1 to 5 minutes on the right column, and this is without people mass-bumping multiple threads. I don't care much about everything else honestly. Just this one about the 'new posts' on the right column, the main reason why I had a separate gold account. "5x more views each day" ain't worth it anymore if it going to be 1 minute of views each. If I want to simply bump for the sub-forum bump I don't need 5 bumps.