ok, thanks; all good.
I made the 'meta TM discussion' thread, so that people who are interested can discuss over there,
and we don't have to polute this one here.
Regards
I'm not sure what point you're trying to get across but there have been several discussions ad nauseam in the past already in this thread on whether or not Meta Platforms owns rights to all Meta+xxxxxx, and the consensus is NO.
"Meta" is a generic word and has been in existence long before Meta Platforms. Otherwise, they would not have to pay $60M to buy it from Metapay and Metabank, they could have done it by UDRP. In fact, Meta Platforms themselves are being sued by other "Meta" companies that have been using the name long before Meta Platforms. Just do a quick google search.
Meta name sales "appear" to have slowed down recently but IMO it's due to:
1) Recent economic woes/Inflation
2) Hype/Initial launch of Meta Platforms using Meta last year has worn off now
3) We are still very early in Metaverse stages
4) People with good names are holding onto their names and not eager to sell
As long as Metaverse is still being talked about and the term used, I'm going to hold onto my Meta+xxxx [.com] as long as possible. What's an annual $10 renewal fee to me when the potential return could be much greater in years to come? I'm more than happy to sell my Meta names to Meta Platforms for $60M or even $6M LOL.
