What, if any, are the general values of a L-L-L dot com domains?
GoPC
GoPC
l-l-l.com said:well let me know when you would be adding more
l-l-l.com said:got
C-O-U.com
C-U-N.com
D-L-N.com
E-O-U.com
F-F-N.com
F-F-U.com
F-G-M.com
D-J-I.com
F-H-D.com
F-I-U.com
F-N-O.com
F-O-H.com
B-U-I.com
G-B-U.com
G-L-F.com
G-S-U.com
F-G-B.com
E-R-U.com
C-R-K.com
D-E-U.com
for 650
NP
you are totally right about this CDMCDM said:Wow, there sure was a lot of hub-bub over this post. everyone seems to agree that you got these l-l-ls at a real bargain at $32.50 each. I won't argue that but i find it interesting as I've been advertising n-n-n and people don't seem to want to pay more than $50 for em. which is interesting because i thought due to the relative scarcity that they would be worth much more. but then again domainers can talk out of both sides of their mouth sometimes. can say a domain is worth xxx but wont shell out xx to buy one. anyway i guess thats besides the point, but if l-l-l are a steal at $32.50 then its probably fair to say they still sell well for $50 which puts them at parity with n-n-n from my perspective. anyone arguments there? what is your perspective l-l-l.com?
AussieDomainer said:Sold the following for $20 each at BQB.com:
O-U-L.com
O-U-N.com
O-U-H.com
I-J-N.com
I also have a heap more at BQB with $20 BIN prices and $19 starting prices. I will be adding more soon too with the same prices.
Adding to bluebecker.com thank you.l-l-l.com said:got
Y-R-D.COM
$45
name pros
N-N-Ns are good, but L-L-Ls have many more potential end users, so when there are premium-letter L-L-L.coms going for $32.50, that's ultimately a much better deal than a typical N-N-N at the same price. Low end for even "bad" letters right now is typically $15 to $20, so what he got for those prices was fantastic.CDM said:Wow, there sure was a lot of hub-bub over this post. everyone seems to agree that you got these l-l-ls at a real bargain at $32.50 each. I won't argue that but i find it interesting as I've been advertising n-n-n and people don't seem to want to pay more than $50 for em. which is interesting because i thought due to the relative scarcity that they would be worth much more. but then again domainers can talk out of both sides of their mouth sometimes. can say a domain is worth xxx but wont shell out xx to buy one. anyway i guess thats besides the point, but if l-l-l are a steal at $32.50 then its probably fair to say they still sell well for $50 which puts them at parity with n-n-n from my perspective. anyone arguments there? what is your perspective l-l-l.com?
great POV dagdag said:N-N-Ns are good, but L-L-Ls have many more potential end users, so when there are premium-letter L-L-L.coms going for $32.50, that's ultimately a much better deal than a typical N-N-N at the same price. Low end for even "bad" letters right now is typically $15 to $20, so what he got for those prices was fantastic.
CDM said:Wow, there sure was a lot of hub-bub over this post. everyone seems to agree that you got these l-l-ls at a real bargain at $32.50 each. I won't argue that but i find it interesting as I've been advertising n-n-n and people don't seem to want to pay more than $50 for em. which is interesting because i thought due to the relative scarcity that they would be worth much more. but then again domainers can talk out of both sides of their mouth sometimes. can say a domain is worth xxx but wont shell out xx to buy one. anyway i guess thats besides the point, but if l-l-l are a steal at $32.50 then its probably fair to say they still sell well for $50 which puts them at parity with n-n-n from my perspective. anyone arguments there? what is your perspective l-l-l.com?
Actually, it would appear that they suffered damage from Hurricane Katrina and are possibly no longer in business: http://www.fedspending.org/faads/faads.php?recip_id=189125&detail=-1arnie said:damn!
didnt see that.
super premiums, and 12 years old!
looks like a company forget to renew
http://whois.domaintools.com/c-n-s.com![]()

