*
Yes. Great tool, which I have bookmarked.
One important feature: when you bring up the keyword, change the pull-down menu from "Broad" to "Exact"--this will offer a more realistic picture of exact type-ins of the word or term. And it's typically a LOT less than than the broad word or term. Thanks to a kind member here on Namepros, I have just learned about this feature.
So, on the keyword list, the word or term on the keyword list should have brackets around it.
Under the broad term feature, for a dot com domain that I would be developing (and if I liked the name), I would hand-reg over 50, buy on the aftermarket anything over 1,000.
All other TLDs, anything over 10,000 would be worth my consideration, but it would depend on the word/term and its monetization possibilities.
Keep in mind that this would be a direct type-in of the term WITHOUT the TLD.
BTW, you can also query this tool for [Keyword TLD] as well to gauge direct navigation (don't include the dot). You'd be surprised how small this number is, even for pricey generics. My domain Poets.net (for the term Poets net) shows 720 broad, but [Poets net] shows 170 exact (In truth, the site gets about 3,000 - 5,000 per month, but it's an active site and ranked fairly high on search engines for the term Poets and Poet). For [Poets com], the direct navigation is 1,300. So now I understand from where the 10% rule is derived for TLDs other than .com.
Maybe I'm not supposed to reveal this trade secret, but I think this is worthwhile information to put out there; I wish I had known about this two years ago, when I was starting out. My portfolio would look very different.
It's not a perfect system, but I think it offers a rough estimation.
When to ignore the tool: when you're hand-regging a term that is very new but has the potential to becoming a blockbuster term. But I would be careful not to reg terms surrounding current events (such as the recent Buffalo tragedy).
*
