MillersCrossing
Account Closed
- Impact
- 29
1. For those of us who are premo holders, here is where something extremely negative for us could play out............potentially one for the lawyers....
If this 70% discount was put into effect to entice us to buy premos with the advance knowledge that this would be moving over to Enom......
And that Enom would auction off the premos at an auction with the winners paying a one off fee...followed by a reg fee for everafter......
Then......if, and I repeat if, Enom decides to keep our premos that we regged at .TV at aa contiuing yearly premium renewal fee........then this in its own right....a very questionable practice.......
But, that yearly reg fee could be offset by any premo holders auctioning their names off to the highest bidder......so some form of compensation there....
If, Enom decides that even if we were to sell our premos on the market.....that any potential new owner would need to keep paying premo renewal fees......then that is a disaster for all of us who hold premos....because who will buy a name of us that even after auction, the new owner would pay premo reg fees.......no one would ever bid on a premo that was bought during .TV's stewardship.....because that equals buying the name off the current owner plus premo reg fees as opposed to other premo names they could buy now at auction with no premo renewal fees.....
This needs to be clarified asap........otherwise all hell will break loose......any jury deciding a case like this would see the obvious manipulation of 70% discount as a lure to get as many premo regges as possible just a couple of months before it goes to enom at auction......
This is as serious an issue as you could possibly have right now....
If this 70% discount was put into effect to entice us to buy premos with the advance knowledge that this would be moving over to Enom......
And that Enom would auction off the premos at an auction with the winners paying a one off fee...followed by a reg fee for everafter......
Then......if, and I repeat if, Enom decides to keep our premos that we regged at .TV at aa contiuing yearly premium renewal fee........then this in its own right....a very questionable practice.......
But, that yearly reg fee could be offset by any premo holders auctioning their names off to the highest bidder......so some form of compensation there....
If, Enom decides that even if we were to sell our premos on the market.....that any potential new owner would need to keep paying premo renewal fees......then that is a disaster for all of us who hold premos....because who will buy a name of us that even after auction, the new owner would pay premo reg fees.......no one would ever bid on a premo that was bought during .TV's stewardship.....because that equals buying the name off the current owner plus premo reg fees as opposed to other premo names they could buy now at auction with no premo renewal fees.....
This needs to be clarified asap........otherwise all hell will break loose......any jury deciding a case like this would see the obvious manipulation of 70% discount as a lure to get as many premo regges as possible just a couple of months before it goes to enom at auction......
This is as serious an issue as you could possibly have right now....
