news An audio recording of the court hearing of HeidiPowell.com

[Julio]

Hello Everyone,

An audio recording of the court hearing of Heidipowell.com that happened on march 22, 2017

https://www.strategicrevenue.com/au...d-calculated-theft-of-heidipowell-com-domain/

 

[Addison]

Skip to 51:19 for the judge's final thoughts.

HeidiPowell.com:

UPDATE MARCH 27, 2017
Two rulings were made by the judge on March 22nd.
​

1. Our exemption is allowed.

2. Trustee is allowed to change his motion.

The decision on whether my domain name is property of the estate is still to be determined.

 

[platey]

If a domain name is considered as property etc a banks would be happy to lend against it and or secure a mortgage against a domain name

But the majority of banks or estate agents would not know how to value domain names in order to be able to lend against a domain name

A domain name is only worth what a person is prepared to pay for it

Some domains don't even sell for $1

 

[TRY]

Source - heidipowell.com
Another update yesterday:
the Trustee filed a request to change the hearing date to July 12, 2017. His reasoning for requesting a continuance is his need for time to review the declarations we filed on June 7, 2017 which were filed in response to his motion to sell my domain name and contract with Godaddy.

 

[Gaptooth]

Update:
August 16, 2017
Court Filing - ORDER Granting Allowing Debtor's Motion Stay To Be Heard Pending Appeal

Hearing date is set for 8/22/2017 at 02:00 PM
Judge Barreca's Courtroom, U.S. Courthouse,
Room 7106, 700 Stewart St, Seattle, WA 98101

Please re-tweet
https://twitter.com/heidipowell/status/898290388196139008

 

[platey]

This case will change the domain name industry more than we can currently comprehend

Someone like one of the industry leaders should negotiate an arrangement whereby they agree to pay the legal fees in exchange for advertising their logo on the domain in question

This domain dispute should never existed

When a person says no its not for sale

No should mean no

Case should have been thrown out at the start as a non starter

 

[Gaptooth]

I'm sad to report that the same judge who decided to sell her my name has denied our motion to obtain a Stay. A stay would have stopped the sale waiting for an appeal decision. Without the stay there is no point to an appeal as the sale will take place without the ability to get it back should we win on appeal. In place of a stay the trustee has requested a $20K bond as insurance if we lose on appeal (to stop the sale while appealing) to protect his interests should she walk away during the appeal process. The bonding company requires a $20K letter of credit to cover it. People who have gone through bankruptcy can't get a letter of credit. Unless there is a miracle by Monday it's gone.