Hi everyone,
I’m building a domain intelligence tool and wanted to get feedback from real domainers before I launch it.
This is not just another bulk availability checker. There are already plenty of those.
The real problem I’m trying to solve is:
The system is focused on commercial niches for now and only focused on USA at the moment (planning to try other countries later).
How it works : You enter a niche, and it researches signals like:
The goal is not to show a huge list of random available names.
The goal is to rank the names that may have the strongest commercial/resale logic, and explain why.
I’ve gone through 16 versions of the model already in the past 2 months.
For testing, I’ve been using real money: registering 10 domains from each of the recent versions, listing them for sale, and comparing which version produces the best acquisition picks.
Results so far :
I have regged and put 60 domains for sale in the last 10 days.
Got an offer on 1 domain.
20% of them get visitors each day.
Getting a real sale in the first 12 months of regging will be the real test of a model for me.
Features already built include:
I’m still refining the ranking logic before opening it up more broadly.
Would love honest feedback:
I know domainers are skeptical, and that’s fair.
My goal is simple: if the tool cannot surface domains that experienced investors would genuinely consider registering, then it is not good enough.
Would appreciate brutal feedback.
I’m building a domain intelligence tool and wanted to get feedback from real domainers before I launch it.
This is not just another bulk availability checker. There are already plenty of those.
The real problem I’m trying to solve is:
Out of thousands of available domains, which ones are actually worth registering?
The system is focused on commercial niches for now and only focused on USA at the moment (planning to try other countries later).
How it works : You enter a niche, and it researches signals like:
- search demand
- CPC
- advertiser activity
- city-level opportunity
- local competition
- available domain combinations
- taken-domain status
- possible resale/BIN pricing logic
- Check existing 'high-value' domains to see if they are business-operated or domainer-owned
- Legal framework like any laws existing about the niche
- Trademark checks
The goal is not to show a huge list of random available names.
The goal is to rank the names that may have the strongest commercial/resale logic, and explain why.
I’ve gone through 16 versions of the model already in the past 2 months.
For testing, I’ve been using real money: registering 10 domains from each of the recent versions, listing them for sale, and comparing which version produces the best acquisition picks.
Results so far :
I have regged and put 60 domains for sale in the last 10 days.
Got an offer on 1 domain.
20% of them get visitors each day.
Getting a real sale in the first 12 months of regging will be the real test of a model for me.
Features already built include:
- CSV upload/export
- CPC data for all 50 states x Top 10 cities by pop.
- Search volume for all keywords and all cities
- Advertiser competition for each city and keyword
- SEO metrics for top 10 organically ranking websites
- SEO metrics for top 5 local pack businesses
- Identifying possible outbound targets
- deduping and cleaning
- saved projects
- recheck history
- bulk availability
- privacy/no-front-running positioning
- taken-domain status:
- developed
- parked
- for sale
- redirecting
- dead/no website
I’m still refining the ranking logic before opening it up more broadly.
Would love honest feedback:
- What signals would make you trust a domain recommendation?
- Would CPC/search volume/local advertiser data matter to you?
- Would you rather see thousands of names, or fewer names with stronger reasoning?
- What would make this different enough from free bulk checkers?
- What would make you immediately dismiss it as another weak domain tool?
I know domainers are skeptical, and that’s fair.
My goal is simple: if the tool cannot surface domains that experienced investors would genuinely consider registering, then it is not good enough.
Would appreciate brutal feedback.














