NameSilo

.tv a-z.tv what you think

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Impact
1,243
i see not many have gone for hyphens names like a-z.tv
some one did say the hyphen does not show up on google ?
Mercedes-Benzs has one big time ,so why do domainers still frown on names like this.
do you have any names like this ?
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
Wrote an article on this awhile back about the L-L I own U-k.tv for the regular $300 price and got e-g.tv for $100 premium
 
0
•••
i like the u-k.tv .think thats a great name ,lwould look good in the corner of a video .not sure what e-g is about.but if you have some and you seam to know what your talking about, maybe there a good bet.ill have a look see how many have gone...is there anymore $100s
 
0
•••
I picked up E-G.tv because it was $100 when it dropped and hit the premium page at $100. I think that if a company did not want to put out $1000 to $10,000 for an LL then maybe you could sell them on the L-L.tv at $300 a year. E-G.tv was the only $100 one. I regged U-K because I thought it was one of the best L-L.tv available.
 
0
•••
hullswingerscom said:
...Mercedes-Benzs has one big time ,so why do domainers still frown on names like this....
Not wishing to jump the theme of your thread, but there has always been a hyphen in the brand/company Mercedes-Benz (circa 1926).
 
0
•••
well i have 3dtvs.tv i decided to get 3d-tvs.tv but a few more years for these to become common
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I agree with you. Curious: right now, how much could A-Z.tv or E-G.tv be worth?
 
0
•••
well i think a-z.tv is one of the best names left becouse with this you can develope anything ,good for selling items.but thats just my view,lots people dont like hyphens

dont like e-g. o-k.tv looks cool
but there getting used more and more.
 
0
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Domain Recover
DomainEasy — Zero Commission
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back