- Impact
- 1,260
Looking and marketing some beautiful names and I am not getting any pulls. I am not looking for $100. I am looking for a reasonable market within the GTLD world.
Hopeful domainers?
I mean seriously. I own Denver.Properties & DNS is asking $33,000 for Denver.Property
What Realestate company only sells property and not properties ?
I own Heart.Surgery !!! It's a beautiful extension matching a keyword in a billion dollar industry yet people think I am crazy for asking six figures, lol... When names like Coffee.Club and Autism.Rocks are selling at $100K a pop... Am I blind ? Lol... I sell TLDs all day for different party's and I have a couple nice ones but my biggest stock is GTLDs. Maybe I am just being impatient but then again who buys GTLDs ?
It's 98% domainers buying and owning thr New gTLDs. Leave only 2% in the hands of end-users. According to the Domain King, Rick Schwartz. http://www.ricksblog.com/2015/12/20-year-post-part-2-gtlds/#.VoNsCHYuWHt
He also contradicts himself buy then saying how great he thought .web could be.
I think it was only in 1997 2% of the world population had Internet too.
What part is the contradiction? He's saying they pretty much all suck, except that .web has the best chance. Which make sense, since it's neutral, generic, or whatever you want to call it and the best one from the new bunch, so obviously it'll get the most regs.
Either they all suck or they don't, didn't even see the point of him bring up .web if he's so negative on gTLDS.
Get it out of your system, so then 2016 will be the year you actually read, it'll save a lot of time.
The ones out so far suck. .web isn't out yet.
Get what out of my system JB?
Reading comprehension issues. I don't think you even actually read the post:
"But if .web were already out, it is my opinion half of the gTLDs would be on life support if they are not already. .web could become the next .com or the next .net. Either position is stronger than all others imo."
It's pretty clear he singles that one out from the rest.
I did read it, long before it was posted here and he clearly doesn't like new gTLDS. But then he says .web might beat all and have the best long tern shot at .com. Give me a break, it's not anymore generic than .xyz. He would have been better off sticking with his comment that he doesn't like new gTLDS, period.
The all or nothing is what you're saying, not him. I just quoted him and yet you still don't get it. And put up .web vs. .xyz poll here. You won't like the results. You really think .xyz is better than .web and if some company had to choose between the 2, more would go with .xyz?
Oh so you think he's Super Man and can predict the future? LOL He says .web in the quote could beat .com or .net.
Quote: ".web could become the next .com or the next .net."
Is this your new position, along with the KING.
Looking and marketing some beautiful names and I am not getting any pulls. I am not looking for $100. I am looking for a reasonable market within the GTLD world.
Left out "Either position is stronger than all others imo."
No, of course not. .com will always be at the top. .web would be more for those that would consider a .net. It's always been my position that .net and .web would be the first 2 best neutral options. Second tier type stuff. Pick one better. I think it's better than the old school .info, .biz, better than any of the ones from the new bunch. And time will bear that out. You don't think it'll be number 1 in reg numbers over the same period of time vs. the other new ones? I think it'll bury them, no discounting needed.
JB you should stop editing all your posts after people reply. This is why I do a full quote on your comments, because you go back and change everything after people reply.
I think edit is more for typo's right?
And per one of your changes above I do have .xyz domains but also many others and they don't dominate my portfolio.