Unstoppable Domains

discuss Will AI Destroy or Catastrophically Harm Humanity?

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch
Impact
30,371
My position has been for years that AI will ultimately cause harm to humanity...in the short term, however, it will be helpful.

Below is an article about an open letter recently released. I think technical singularity is no more than 10 years away. (I am not a computer specialist...just played one on radio one time)

OpenAI Insider Estimates 70 Percent Chance That AI Will Destroy or Catastrophically Harm Humanity​


fter former and current OpenAI employees released an open letter claiming they're being silenced against raising safety issues, one of the letter's signees made an even more terrifying prediction: that the odds AI will either destroy or catastrophically harm humankind are greater than a coin flip.

In an interview with The New York Times, former OpenAI governance researcher Daniel Kokotajlo accused the company of ignoring the monumental risks posed by artificial general intelligence (AGI) because its decision-makers are so enthralled with its possibilities.

"OpenAI is really excited about building AGI," Kokotajlo said, "and they are recklessly racing to be the first there."

Kokotajlo's spiciest claim to the newspaper, though, was that the chance AI will wreck humanity is around 70 percent — odds you wouldn't accept for any major life event, but that OpenAI and its ilk are barreling ahead with anyway.

The term "p(doom)," which is AI-speak for the probability that AI will usher in doom for humankind, is the subject of constant controversy in the machine learning world.

The 31-year-old Kokotajlo told the NYT that after he joined OpenAI in 2022 and was asked to forecast the technology's progress, he became convinced not only that the industry would achieve AGI by the year 2027, but that there was a great probability that it would catastrophically harm or even destroy humanity.

As noted in the open letter, Kokotajlo and his comrades — which includes former and current employees at Google DeepMind and Anthropic, as well as Geoffrey Hinton, the so-called "Godfather of AI" who left Google last year over similar concerns — are asserting their "right to warn" the public about the risks posed by AI.

Kokotajlo became so convinced that AI posed massive risks to humanity that eventually, he personally urged OpenAI CEO Sam Altman that the company needed to "pivot to safety" and spend more time implementing guardrails to reign in the technology rather than continue making it smarter.

Altman, per the former employee's recounting, seemed to agree with him at the time, but over time it just felt like lip service.

Fed up, Kokotajlo quit the firm in April, telling his team in an email that he had "lost confidence that OpenAI will behave responsibly" as it continues trying to build near-human-level AI.

"The world isn’t ready, and we aren’t ready," he wrote in his email, which was shared with the NYT. "And I’m concerned we are rushing forward regardless and rationalizing our actions."

Between the big-name exits and these sorts of terrifying predictions, the latest news out of OpenAI has been grim — and it's hard to see it getting any sunnier moving forward.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...y-harm-humanity/ar-BB1nCYmi?ocid=BingNewsSerp
 
6
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
GoDaddyGoDaddy
As many times before, movies already told us about it :xf.cool:



 
5
•••
Adam have bit the apple, even though he knew what will be the consequences. It's too late for AI to be dealt with, it is already developed for many years in the backend, the ChatGPT is just a public reveal of that bigger beast, believe me Governments have something more powerful than what is in the public eye, would not be surprised that it already runs everything in the world and is powered by Quantum computers. Wake up.
Lucky me I have the best AGI domain in the world in King.
 
3
•••
It's too late for AI to be dealt with, it is already developed for many years in the backend, the ChatGPT is just a public reveal of that bigger beast, believe me Governments have something more powerful than what is in the public eye
I agree...all we have seen so far is the tip of the iceberg.
 
3
•••
My position has been for years that AI will ultimately cause harm to humanity...in the short term, however, it will be helpful.

With the direction things seems to be heading, I agree. My main concern right now lies especially in that AI will come to find humanity 'unnecessary' - and worse, an unwanted problem - and will decide to act on getting rid of it.
 
Last edited:
3
•••
I think what scares me most is that if it isn’t already, it will soon be impossible to tell real life from the digital world. This is the Industrial Revolution of our age. Remember how dramatically and quickly that changed the world? This will change it in ways we can’t even imagine, and in a fraction of the time. Many of us will soon be obsolete.

www.BecomingObsolete.com
 
4
•••
I think what scares me most is that if it isn’t already, it will soon be impossible to tell real life from the digital world. This is the Industrial Revolution of our age. Remember how dramatically and quickly that changed the world? This will change it in ways we can’t even imagine, and in a fraction of the time. Many of us will soon be obsolete.
I don't even want to post the info about this particular site but just this morning an old friend sent a text suggesting I look into something thinking we could create our own to make money.

It is an AI generated dating site...you can create your own person or select from the 'men/women' created by others. You simply find one you like and begin chatting with the AI bot instantly. The pics are very well done and look like real, but idealized, people.

The sliding on the slippery slope has begun.
 
3
•••
I don't even want to post the info about this particular site but just this morning an old friend sent a text suggesting I look into something thinking we could create our own to make money.

It is an AI generated dating site...you can create your own person or select from the 'men/women' created by others. You simply find one you like and begin chatting with the AI bot instantly. The pics are very well done and look like real, but idealized, people.

The sliding on the slippery slope has begun.
Lol, you’d eventually get rich — but can we be sure this doesn’t already exist? Every time I turn around, I’m alarmed by the new “tech” out there — almost none of which seems to actually be bringing people together.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
My main concern right now lies especially in that AI will come to find humanity 'unnecessary' - and worse, an unwanted problem - and will decide to act on getting rid of it.
Since childhood I've been a science fiction fan...my dad was a chemical and mechanical engineer and he let me go down all the science based paths I wanted.

Of the hundreds of scifi books I read, those dealing with machines running things seemed the least likely. All we have to do is 'pull the plug' and any errant machine will come back into line.

That's not going to be possible for a variety of reasons once a certain point is reached. Even if one nation were willing and able to do it, others likely won't comply (thinking war machines here).
 
2
•••
3
•••
Of the hundreds of scifi books I read, those dealing with machines running things seemed the least likely. All we have to do is 'pull the plug' and any errant machine will come back into line.

That's not going to be possible for a variety of reasons once a certain point is reached.

Agreed. I'm assuming the same will likely happen, and that any solutions needed will likely have to come from 'designing ways forward while leaving the problem in place'.
 
2
•••
itll be like demolition man, mankind will be run underground by the elite rich that want a utopia, and we will be rat people. Now look at your robovacuum. lol.
 
3
•••
itll be like demolition man, mankind will be run underground by the elite rich that want a utopia, and we will be rat people. Now look at your robovacuum. lol.

Though mine might be one of us, to be honest… just another fallible human.

20230729_070059_IMG_9160.jpeg
 
Last edited:
3
•••
Just when you were ready to buy that new luxury sedan...

Generative AI Can Write Computer Code. Will We Still Need Software Developers?​


We’re seeing a wave of new generative AI tools that can write text, generate images, create music and more. Some can even write computer code, which makes sense when you think that computer code is just another type of language. From a well-known, generic tool like ChatGPT to specific AI coding tools created for developers, new tools are rapidly emerging that offer code suggestions and even write entire code. And it can all be done based on natural language prompts or by learning from existing code.

Naturally, this is already changing the work that software developers do. But what are the long-term implications of this? Will we even need software developers in the future? Read on to find out. (AI is already reducing time to write code from 10 weeks to 1 week in some cases)

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernar...ill-need-software-developers/?sh=7b4c8ffd6342
 
3
•••
Dynadot — .com TransferDynadot — .com Transfer
Appraise.net

We're social

Domain Recover
DomainEasy — Live Options
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back