Dan.com stole my $

[ksusha64]

Dan.com accepted the $ for the domain they knew they did not have. I have proof they didn't have that domain and accepted money anyway. They refunded $4,000 short for the name. They are breaking the law by not keeping your $ in secure escrow account. Instead they returned $4,000 less from different BANK, different COUNTRY, and shorted me $4,000.
I demand they return the $ I paid for the name. They held the $ for 1 week!!! and returned $4,000 short.
Dan.com is complete scam. They refusing to deal with details. I will post screen shots and proof.

 

[Domain boy]

Screenshot or close the thread. You’re losing credibility with every post otherwise.

.

 

[Future Sensors]

Dan actually refunded you pretty quickly. With Paypal it can take much longer (see below).

Again, it's your fault that you wired this large amount of money to them, while they instructed you not yet to do so.

===

 

[ksusha64]

Is dan.com disputing one fact I stated?

Dan actually refunded you pretty quickly. With Paypal it can take much longer (see below).

Again, it's your fault that you wired this large amount of money to them, while they instructed you not yet to do so.

===

Show attachment 206154

They told me not to wire after money was sent!

 

[ksusha64]

Nobody asks a question why didn't they return money same day????

 

[Lox]

Also used two different companies, undeveloped and dan.com for 2 transactions.

NL Chamber of Commerce reg. office

 

[Future Sensors]

The same way Sedo does. Using TXT or any sort of verification ID inserted into DNS settings (funny DAN does ask you to put TXT, but it's only to remove ''leftovers'' from their system).

Yes, and even at Sedo I have experienced others removing domains from my account, while I had them successfully verified with TXT and CNAME repeatedly.

 

[ksusha64]

Why did Dan.com not refund me funds with same exchange rate it was sent?

 

[VadimK]

Yes, and even at Sedo I have experienced others removing domains from my account, while I had them successfully verified with TXT and CNAME repeatedly.

True that. But at least at Sedo you can't list them unverified in the first place. Later I agree, there are some shit happens too as name start changing owners.

 

[ksusha64]

Why did they wait whole business week to send on worst possible exchange rate for me?

 

[Lox]

The same way Sedo does. Using TXT or any sort of verification ID inserted into DNS settings (funny DAN does ask you to put TXT, but it's only to remove ''leftovers'' from their system).

This doesn't work. Frontrunners & co manage to bypass the verification process. ( Monitoring & DD since September 02)

 

[ksusha64]

If any of you bought a name and got $4,000 less you would probably file a lawsuit by now.

 

[ksusha64]

Dan.com excuse. We told you not to send Money after you already sent it! I love it

 

[ksusha64]

That's the reason I should be cheated for $4,000? Because they told me not to send the $ after I sent it???

 

[ksusha64]

What is dan.com disputing??? One fact that I stated.

 

[ksusha64]

Main fact I lost $4,000 due to heir negligence and most likely fraud.

 

[VadimK]

This doesn't work. Frontrunners & co manage to bypass the verification process. ( Monitoring & DD since September 02)

Yes, but it's a different issue. In Sedo I can't post the name that is not mine. With Dan it happened to me - by mistake placed two names in .com instead of .xyz , and names were sold in 12 hours (later cancelled of course).

 

[sircc]

How would you suggest they do that?

They already have a third DNS to verify ownership. They just need to enforce it.

 

[branding]

They already have a third DNS to verify ownership. They just need to enforce it.

doesn't solve the issue of orphaned domains though.

When it comes to verification, Dan has one of the best systems imo. It could be better ( from a buyers perspective) but it's not bad at all.

 

[branding]

Fwiw, checked my cancelled transactions at Dan. 100 refund from what I sent to them. Any incurred costs due to my PP.

 

[VadimK]

doesn't solve the issue of orphaned domains though.

When it comes to verification, Dan has one of the best systems imo. It could be better ( from a buyers perspective) but it's not bad at all.

Dan's verification system is not anywhere near the ''best'' as you can list very easily names that are not yours. Read my comment three posts up.

 

[ksusha64]

None of the domaines here stated they paid 5+ figures in euros for domain and got returned exact amount.
Not one person has proof of successful transaction of returning wired funds from dan.com.
Not one person in this chat.

 

[ksusha64]

Maybe Dan.com cheats all buyers of domains who do not get their domain. They happened to be non domaines for most part.
There is not one person here who can show proof of successful similar transaction without being cheated.
If u do please share it

 

[ksusha64]

It seems like a typical scam someone would do with switch and bait.
Selling names you do not have then cheat buyers on exchange rate.
Return the amount when exchange rate is least favorable for buyer.

 

[ksusha64]

Not one domainer here said they had similar situation and got their money back correctly.
NOT ONE PERSON.

 

[Xiberia]

If u send someone 1 btc for a name that you don't have, then wait until btc goes from 60-50K and then return 1 btc thats fraud.

This is not the same thing because you're getting back exactly what you sent. The dollar price only matters if you're going to sell, so just wait for a higher price to sell at and there's no "fraud".

Your case is actually more unfair because yes you were "scammed", you just weren't scammed by Dan. You sent $58k and got back $54k, because banks take their fees and make up their own exchange rates. They do this kind of scamming of everyone and every thing. It's how they work. It's why we all love banks so much.

Nobody asks a question why didn't they return money same day????

Did they even receive the money on the same day?