IT.COM

.com 63 character domain name sold for $800..

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

Arpit131

Top Member
Impact
4,441
The domain name containing 63 9's .COM sold for $800 on GoDaddy.

Here's a screenshot:

1.JPG


I am still wondering who are such buyers and why do they buy such names?
 
15
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
Personally, I prefer to say exactly what I think about ANY kind of domains. Both negative and positive stuff.

Yes, but regarding to 63.DOMAINS I prefer to listen to positive viewww only because all those who state their negative viewww about them are just showing me that they can't imagine what I can.

The beginning of all great was an imagination.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
Yes, but regarding to 63.DOMAINS I prefer to listen to positive viewww only because all those who state their negative viewww about them are just showing me that they can't imagine what I can.

The beginning of all great was an imagination.

As well as hybris.
 
1
•••
As well as hybris.
No hybris, just fact.
Obviously I can imagine that 63.DOMAINS are the domains with the highest worth while obviously others can't.
This thread is the proof for it.

thumbs up.jpg
 
Last edited:
3
•••
4
•••

As far as we knowww this human comes also from Austriaaa, even more - he even comes from 'my' home town.

Maybe he will be back someday to purchase my toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top

Because yes, he can*.

*At least I think so.
 
Last edited:
2
•••
Off topic, but this human comes from 'my' hometown:

dolph-lundgren-9.jpg
 
1
•••
Yesss unfortunately there is also 'disgusting art' in this world.

But 63.DOMAINS are the complete opposite of anything disgusting - they are simply based on total smart logic considerations.

A domain isn't the best just because it's the longest. By that "logic" the person with the longest name in the world also has the best name in the world.

You can't logically claim that something is the best without having a valid means of measurement. As domainers attempting to profit from our names, I would say that logically the best names are the ones that fetch the greatest amount of money.
 
2
•••
As domainers attempting to profit from our names, I would say that logically the best names are the ones that fetch the greatest amount of money.

I totally agree...
 
1
•••
@KINGOF.TOP , how much is the .top registry paying you?

I can't imagine someone buying and renewing 4000+ domains in a pure crap extension that's marked as spam everywhere without some kind of incentive (such as free registrations and/or renewals) when you have hundreds of threads promoting .top.
 
2
•••
@KINGOF.TOP , how much is the .top registry paying you?

I can't imagine someone buying and renewing 4000+ domains in a pure crap extension that's marked as spam everywhere without some kind of incentive (such as free registrations and/or renewals) when you have hundreds of threads promoting .top.
@David Walker

Although it's oftopic, I want to reply:

Nothing, I am independent - but I am sure you knowww that already - so why this question?

It's not a 'crap extension' (?), it's the ultimate extension because it's meaning is above all other TLD meanings.
If you don't see it nowww you will see it at another time.

It's the 2nd most registered new TLD already:
http://namestat.org

My incentive is my convince that .top will rule the web.
You can find my reasons for this view in my threads.
I don't promote .top I write what I think.
 
Last edited:
1
•••
A domain isn't the best just because it's the longest. By that "logic" the person with the longest name in the world also has the best name in the world.

You can't logically claim that something is the best without having a valid means of measurement. As domainers attempting to profit from our names, I would say that logically the best names are the ones that fetch the greatest amount of money.

Yesss a domain isn't the best just because it's the longest.
But I never said that, so either you don't understand or you don't want to understand.
Just read (again?) my stated arguments if you are serious.
Then you will see the big logic behind it.
I explained it more than once - it's not just the length.

Yesss the best names are the ones that fetch the greatest amount of money.
Regarding to 63.DOMAINS it seems that apparently I am just more optimistic / patient than you - because I am convinced that 63.DOMAINS will fetch the greatest amount of money.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
Yes, a domain isn't the best just because it's the longest.
But I never said that, either you don't understand or you don't want to understand.
So read again my stated arguments if you are serious.
Then you will see the big logic behind it.

Well... here's what you said:

Also, your example (regardless of your S/TLD point) 'top.com' is not matching becasue 'top.com' contains just 1 top. So the only example (regardless of your S/TLD point) which would make sense here would / can only be 'top.top' because 'top.top' contains 2 top's.
But also with a SLD you can't reach the most top's with 'top.top' - at the end you simply need
'toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top' (
21 times top = 63 characters + TLD .top) to reach the most possible top's.

So there is nooo wayyy to top it.
It's just a given fact / circumstance which I use.
The result of it is the highest possible domain which can exist.

Here's what I understand your logic to be:
  • "Top" is (for some reason) the most desirable word for a domain name.
  • Having more Tops in a domain is better than having less Tops
  • Therefore the longer the domain the better.
  • Because your domain has the most possible Tops, it is the longest, and thus the best.
Here's everyone else's logic:
  • Nobody buys these.
  • Top is an okay keyword, but too easily replaced by "best", "ultimate", "greatest", "finest", "most".....
 
2
•••
2
•••
@KINGOF.TOP , how much is the .top registry paying you?

I can't imagine someone buying and renewing 4000+ domains in a pure crap extension that's marked as spam everywhere without some kind of incentive (such as free registrations and/or renewals) when you have hundreds of threads promoting .top.
i agree. Also, the sooner he admits it the sooner you guys can give him a staff badge. lol
 
2
•••
Well... here's what you said:



Here's what I understand your logic to be:
  • "Top" is (for some reason) the most desirable word for a domain name.
  • Having more Tops in a domain is better than having less Tops
  • Therefore the longer the domain the better.
  • Because your domain has the most possible Tops, it is the longest, and thus the best.
Here's everyone else's logic:
  • Nobody buys these.
  • Top is an okay keyword, but too easily replaced by "best", "ultimate", "greatest", "finest", "most".....
It's the combination of the most possible number (21) of the ultimate term top + the fact that this results in the most possible number of characters (63) + the fact that it ends with the ultimate TLD .top

top has 3 L, it can't replaced by other superlatives, top means top, best means best, a means a and z means z.
But top means top.
That's why it's used worldwide as the ultimate superlative in economy, media, news, radio, TV, web etc.
And that's why it is nowww used as a TLD hahaahaaa it's time to realize it.
Also, apart of this point and regarding to my toptoptop... ...top.top it would not make sense to combine another (repeating) term with the TLD .top because it's a decisive point that the domain name itself is the repeating of the TLD.

So say what you want, those facts are facts and everybody knowwws it, you too.
Maybe you don't want to accept it but that's another thing and not myyy problem.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
It's the combination of the most possible number (21) of the ultimate term top + the fact that this results in the most possible number of characters (63) + the fact that it ends with the ultimate TLD .top

top has 3 L, it can't replaced by other superlatives, top means top, best means best, a means a and z means z.
But top means top.
That's why it's used worldwide as the ultimate superlative in economy, media, news, radio, TV, web etc.
And that's why it is nowww used as a TLD hahaahaaa it's time to realize it.
Also, apart of this point and regarding to my toptoptop... ...top.top it would not make sense to combine another (repeating) term with the TLD .top because it's a decisive point that the domain name itself is the repeating of the TLD.

So say what you want, those facts are facts and everybody knowwws it, you too.
Maybe you don't want to accept it but that's another thing and not myyy problem.

Very little of that is fact. It's all your opinion.

Where does it say that "top" is the ultimate superlative?
 
0
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
Lol. That's my point! Thank you.
I say it because it's a fact in my viewww which is based on my mind, intellect, logic.
top means top and nothing can top the top because it's already the top.
 
Last edited:
0
•••
I say it because it's a fact in my viewww which is based on my mind, intellect, logic.
top means top and nothing can top the top because it's already the top.

A fact based on your mind, huh?
 
0
•••
Last edited:
0
•••
I think the reactions are fair.

Imagine going back time and telling people that one day humans can travel from Europe to Australia in under 24 hours. People probably would hang you at those times.
 
2
•••
Nothing special, everybody must use his mind to detect facts.
In your mind it is a fact, others call it faith(or a delusion).

Becoming a widely-known fact, well... that is something completely different. I can believe that .horse is the best gtld ever because in my mind, it is a fact (belief) that horses are the most supreme animal in the world, and nothing could be better. Convincing others that it is true, would be a huge burden. The flip-side of that coin is convincing the believer himself otherwise as well....
 
0
•••
What if we stop giving him attention?
 
3
•••
0
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back