.com 63 character domain name sold for $800..

[Arpit131]

The domain name containing 63 9's .COM sold for $800 on GoDaddy.

Here's a screenshot:

I am still wondering who are such buyers and why do they buy such names?

 

[Arca]

It's not a problem, it's a solution (against resulting problems if more characters would be alowed).
The significance about 63.DOMAINS is their combination of their pattern in the maximum number of characteres and their TLD.
If those points fitting perfectly together, then they are perfect 63.DOMAINS which are highest in it's exclusivity, highest in it's demand and highest in it's pricing.

An extremeley rich person (contemporary art collector, enduser) who can buy any domain he want, wouldn't buy 'just a boring 1 character domain'.
He would buy the highest of all 63.DOMAINS - the one, which is a combination of an untoppable pattern in the maximum number of characteres and an untoppable TLD - in other words, he would buy

♛
THE MOST EXPENSIVE DOMAIN OF ALL TIME
toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top

21 times top / TLD .top
21 x 3 charachteres = 63 characters
63 characters + TLD .top

The highest possible combination, true perfection.

That's what I think what every billionair would prefer.
In front of this domain every 1 character domain is a 'joke'.

That's how I see it.

This is incorrect. Since your system is based on the limits of the DNS system, you should know that a domain can be much longer than this. toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top is far from the longest domain possible.

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

This is incorrect. Since your system is based on the limits of the DNS system, you should know that a domain can be much longer than this. toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top is far from the longest domain possible.

Of course I speak about domains in / based on the DNS system.
So it's correct.

 

[Arca]

The point is, there is simply no correlation between maximum domain length and "perfection". It's just a number based on an artificial limit.

 

[Arca]

Of course I speak about domains in / based on the DNS system.
So it's correct.

This domain name is allowed by the DNS system:
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcde.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

The point is, there is simply no correlation between maximum domain length and "perfection". It's just a number based on an artificial limit.

The point is, there is simply a correlation between maximum domain length and perfection - because it's simply the highest possible number based on the DNS system*.

*which sets this official limit - so it doesn't matter that it is 'artificial'

 

[Arca]

The point is, there is simply a correlation between maximum domain length and perfection - because it's simply the highest possible number based on the DNS system*.

*which sets this official limit - so it doesn't matter that it is 'artificial'

Are all maximum limits perfect?

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

This domain name is allowed by the DNS system:
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcde.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijk.com

Are you aware about the difference between a domain and a subdomain?
I thought we are speaking about 63.DOMAINS and not about '63.SUBDOMAINS'.

Regarding to your example, of course I know that there could be created a sub.sub.sub.domain out of toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top

Then it would look like this (ignore the colorings):

toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top

Yesss this looks really great.
Those are now really the really highest possible number of toptoptoptop, until they 'end' with the TLD .top

But the great point is, that this anyhow is only possible for the current owner of the domain, in this case only for me as the current owner of toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top

So no other can 'register' (create) this sub.sub.sub.domain.

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

Are all maximum limits perfect?

That's a philosophical question - but in this context I clearly would say yes.

 

[Arca]

That's a philosophical question - but in this context I clearly would say yes.

Following your logic, all 63 letter domains are perfect. However, you play a linguistic game by saying that 'top' means the highest, and that the dictionary definition of this word makes your "perfect" domain more perfect than all the other "perfect" 63 letter domains, which does not make any sense. And since there is no actual correlation between "perfection" and a maximum set limit, I'm afraid it will be very hard to find a buyer who shares this misconception about 63 letter domains.

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

Following your logic, all 63 letter domains are perfect. However, you play a linguistic game by saying that 'top' means the highest, and that the dictionary definition of this word makes your "perfect" domain more perfect than all the other "perfect" 63 letter domains, which does not make any sense. And since there is no actual correlation between "perfection" and a maximum set limit, I'm afraid it will be very hard to find a buyer who shares this misconception about 63 letter domains.

No, as I said above, only those 63.DOMAINS are perfect which have a perfect combination of their pattern in the maximum number of characteres and their TLD.

Yes, top means highest because words have a meaning and meanings have the purpose to express something definite.

So there is no 'misconception'.
There is just your 'attitude of refusal' against those undeniable facts.
So there will be rich and open minded buyers.

BTW
I am not seeking buyers.
Rich and open minded buyers will find my domain.

 

[Arca]

Rich and open minded buyers will find my domain.

Very few people know that the maximum letter limit for a domain is 63. Very few people know that .top is a domain extension. It's very unlikely that anyone will simply come looking for toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top.

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

Very few people know that the maximum letter limit for a domain is 63. Very few people know that .top is a domain extension. It's very unlikely that anyone will simply come looking for toptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptoptop.top.

That's true.
But it speaks for it's exclusivity.
Time will manage it for me, I have time.

 

[Arca]

That's true.
But it speaks for it's exclusivity.
Time will manage it for me.

What's your estimated time-frame for this elusive wealthy 63 ngtld domain aficionado to appear?

 

[DOMAIN ILLUMINATI]

What's your estimated time-frame for this elusive wealthy 63 ngtld domain aficionado to appear?

Hard to say.
Maybe tomorrowww morning.
Maybe in one week / month / year / decade.

To be exact, it depends on all other things on earth and heaven because I believe that everything in existence is connected in some way.

So, simply @ the right time

 

[DNScholar]

Interesting question is till how many 63 char domains registered including all extensions.

 

[Kenny]

Revolution #9

Peace,
Cy

Edit:
Late to the party. Didn't realize it was 7 pages already when I posted this.

 

[TRY]

If someone was super rich and wanted to own at least 1 domain name for personal use,
then it's obvious to me that their first choice
is they should own their name in com.
It's not like they don't have the money.

P.s..the the thing about spreading propaganda is its seldom sincere.

 

[Joe N]

Are all maximum limits perfect?

Yeah, this is pretty much the issue. This and, "Is there any demand for these?"

@KINGOF.TOP is inferring two things here:

1. That 63 character domains with a pattern are perfect.
2. That people want them (or will want them).

The issue is that these beliefs only exist in his mind. There's no evidence to support that anyone else feels the same way (except newcomers and family members who have been convinced otherwise... but they're not the ones being asked to spend millions on these).

I mean... I just had the smelliest fart in the world. The smell is unique, and I believe that because it's the smelliest possible fart, I could bottle it, and people would pay me millions for it, because no fart could possibly be smellier. It is fart perfection. Maybe most people don't like smelling farts... but I think there are some billionaires out there who do. And I think that one day they'll find my fart and will want to buy it because it's so distinctive.

Being the "most" of something doesn't mean it's good. Being unique doesn't mean it's good. Being in love with it yourself doesn't mean it will ever be in demand.

Sometimes the maximum, and most unique of something... just stinks.

 

[dordomai]

It's true that you can sell almost everything if you market it right. Without marketing it will be hard to get someone to buy this. That is the problem.

 

[-EM-]

Why bother so much? You can get a SLD say top.com and register any domain under that SLD with n x 63 characters....