IT.COM

Is Adam Dicker a criminal? You decide.

Spaceship Spaceship
Watch

S-B

Account Closed
Impact
5,263
This story starts with DNF; a barren wasteland that once was a leading forum within the domain industry. While the forum itself played a huge role in propagating the myth that is Adam Dicker, the story really begins with DNF College in the summer of 2011.

Read More




Updates / Reports
These are in no particular order.

From what I understand, Adam still owes north of $33,000 to previous customers and business partners. As I receive more information, I will update this figure.
 
44
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
0
•••
1
•••
11
•••
2
•••
He charged himself $3000 for that site and never paid.

So maybe he is also one of those his haters at Eliot's blog
 
0
•••
He stated in his email he would never be on anything with Adam Dicker, so obviously that is true.

We all now know the REPUTATION Adam Dicker has now.

And Sahar is the only one person supporting him. Really strange !!!!
 
0
•••
Honest men step forward - Dicker take note..
Off of Sarid FB https://www.facebook.com/sahar.sarid?

" Frank Schilling has decided to be a no show after confirming attendance. No reason given. Tuesday 3/29 will be a dark day without a participant unless he shows up. Just FYI. "

People cannot hide the truth any longer as it has become evident to all who follow the real leaders in this industry.. Frank S. has stepped up again for now and hopefully will continue to do so in the future. These are the type of people you learn from. From beginners to advanced domain people.

Hats off to Frank S !
 
2
•••
It is strange to me the community still hasn't addressed this saga. 2 top bloggers write about DomainingAMA and don't mention it... why?
 
1
•••
It is strange to me the community still hasn't addressed this saga. 2 top bloggers write about DomainingAMA and don't mention it... why?
BINGO!!!!!!!
 
1
•••
It is strange to me the community still hasn't addressed this saga. 2 top bloggers write about DomainingAMA and don't mention it... why?
sztgCWy.png
 
2
•••
I was just digging in my emails and found this:

"Total: $169.95 CAD

Order Description:

CHRISTMAS SPECIAL - Platinum to Exclusive Upgrade - Limited Time Offer 50% OFF Subscription"

"Total: $50.95 USD

Order Description:

Platinum Life Membership"

Looks like ~$200 well spent... Not.
 
0
•••
https://www.facebook.com/sahar.sarid

So Mr George Verdugo called me a loser for hiding behind an Avatar, along with everyone else. I met Mr Verdugo at Namescon and he was polite to my face, now I see how he rolls (I suppose this makes Frank S a loser for dropping out)... My avatar Mr Verdugo is my company logo and I fear nothing from a person such as yourself or Mr Rick Wedzinga, least of all people that try to defend their partner Dicker. I will be a loser then Verdugo for standing up to people like Dicker, you can call me all the names you want because you make yourself look worse than any avatar... So for all the losers that use their logo or whatever for their avatars, "Love is in the air"
 
0
•••
Morgan Linton's reaction to Adam in the comments on his blog. http://morganlinton.com/breaking-sahar-announces-domainingama/ Glad he isn't supporting him

upload_2016-3-21_11-31-9.png


This is a very interesting investigative video into mugshots.com and Sahar's involvement with it: http://fusion.net/interactive/252451/digilantes-mugshots-dotcom-investigation/

In part of the video it shows Sahar refusing to talk to them or answer questions and going inside his house. Someone should contact them and let them know Adam was a part of the whole industry with his site removemugshots.com

Here is another blog post on the whole thing: http://onlinedomain.com/2016/03/21/opinions/frank-schilling-pulls-domainingama/
 
2
•••
I agree with Sahar that one should do business legally.

However, legally should not be the sole determination. Morals and ethics are equally important too.

There are loopholes and red tape in laws and rules that some exploit. For example, a friend who borrowed a huge sum of money but ignore and avoid when it's time to return. Police can't and won't question / investigate / arrest the friend as they view this as a case of fraudulent debtor because it's not a criminal offense. That friend is not convicted and thus he has done no wrong and can get away with it?

Just because lying is not a convictable offense doesn't mean it's ok to lie.


Back to Adam Dicker, I have learnt a lot from him and I recognised his contributions to this industry.

Adam may had made mistakes and I always believe one should be given second chances if one were to make things right.

I agree with Sahar that the lynch mob here in this thread had spiralled out of control.

However, Adam had plenty of time and chances and platforms to clarify his side of the story, and to make things right. I'm utterly disappointed that a person I looked up to when I first entered this industry is in fact so irresponsible and unrepentant.

Sahar, if you are reading this and truly believe in standing up against bullies and giving a platform for the voiceless, leverage your friendship and influence on Adam to help him voice out and clarify the situation with your platform, and to make things right and whole.

Or maybe, it's time Shane should finally go through his promise regarding Part 2.


PS: Any lawyer here who can help me regarding fraudulent debtor, please contact me, I need help.
 
1
•••
in China he do.this we go to his house and tie him up with his pork balls.

He cheat do something go to his house protest no post here tak action
 
4
•••
4
•••
Apparently my blog ranks rather quickly...

Google our buddy Sahar Sarid.

Screen_Shot_2016_03_21_at_4_48_23_PM.png
 
Last edited:
0
•••
0
•••
His pictures are so creepy.
 
0
•••
upload_2016-3-23_9-10-48.png


Please. Give me a break with this "free speech" stuff. It has nothing to do with denying Adam his free speech or a protected platform. The right thing to do is to NOT appear on a platform with someone who has been proven to lie and deceive and rip people off, otherwise it would lend credibility to him and give people the impression that he is someone they should listen to and follow. Frank did the right thing by protecting his own character, and refusing to condone Adam's behavior so as not to lead others to the wrong conclusion.

Sahar is trying to twist this whole thing around to make himself look like the hero here, and most people see right through it. Adam doesnt need Sahar to swoop in as his Savior, Adam could have taken plenty of opportunities to speak up and "clarify" or "explain his side" - on his own social media pages or DNF before it got shut down. It didn't have to be on NamePros.

Sahar can do whatever he wants and have Adam on his AMA, it doesnt mean he is entitled to support from others when he makes ethically and morally challenged decisions. When he does that, others have the "right" to their own free speech and protest. Calling all of them trolls and bullies is silly.... isn't he labeling them for speaking out against the wrongs of Dicker? He claims to have no reason to judge Adam based on all the evidence against him until he is convicted in court despite everything staring him in the face, but then turns around and decides all the protesters who have been hurt by Adam are merely trolls. Hypocritical.

I suppose one good thing about this is, it will allow all of us to see who is still burying their heads in the sand to support Dicker so we can be wary of them too.
 
10
•••
The 'smoking gun'... or pastry, as the case may be...
h42387769394594593943h4_n.jpg
 
4
•••
Sahar Sarid - Frank S doesn't have to give you any reason and it's up to him whether to come on your show or not.

It's rude and not cool at all.-_-

Frank S took the right decision :D




Show attachment 26951

Please. Give me a break with this "free speech" stuff. It has nothing to do with denying Adam his free speech or a protected platform. The right thing to do is to NOT appear on a platform with someone who has been proven to lie and deceive and rip people off, otherwise it would lend credibility to him and give people the impression that he is someone they should listen to and follow. Frank did the right thing by protecting his own character, and refusing to condone Adam's behavior so as not to lead others to the wrong conclusion.

Sahar is trying to twist this whole thing around to make himself look like the hero here, and most people see right through it. Adam doesnt need Sahar to swoop in as his Savior, Adam could have taken plenty of opportunities to speak up and "clarify" or "explain his side" - on his own social media pages or DNF before it got shut down. It didn't have to be on NamePros.

Sahar can do whatever he wants and have Adam on his AMA, it doesnt mean he is entitled to support from others when he makes ethically and morally challenged decisions. When he does that, others have the "right" to their own free speech and protest. Calling all of them trolls and bullies is silly.... isn't he labeling them for speaking out against the wrongs of Dicker? He claims to have no reason to judge Adam based on all the evidence against him until he is convicted in court despite everything staring him in the face, but then turns around and decides all the protesters who have been hurt by Adam are merely trolls. Hypocritical.

I suppose one good thing about this is, it will allow all of us to see who is still burying their heads in the sand to support Dicker so we can be wary of them too.
 
0
•••
So Mr Free Speech Sarid, lets see, you resort to name calling while I and others continue to state the facts. You resort to calling the people on Namepros Trolls and whatever else spills out of your mouth, while I and others again are stating truth. Anyone has the right to free speech, what, is that news ? However , people also have the right to their own morals and values. Its also apparent that Frank S has morals and values, does that offend you Mr Sarid ? I think it does because its obvious you don't care about who you invite to speak. Obviously you relied on Franks friendship which in fact you should NOT abuse your friend like that and put him in a position to even have to make this kind of decision in the first place. So obviously you put yourself and your tiny insignificant little show above your so called real friendship... I find that proof positive where a person like you stands. I certainly would not want a friend like you.

Sarids quote " A true leader is one who's willing to lead, even if no one follows."

My quote "A true friend is one who NEVER puts another friend in a bad position for their own gains"
 
0
•••
In addition he states
"It's OK disagree without being disagreeable."

But its okay to call everyone Trolls and Bullies, wouldn't that be called a contradiction ?
 
0
•••
I agree with Sahar that one should do business legally.

Back to Adam Dicker, I have learnt a lot from him and I recognised his contributions to this industry.

Adam may had made mistakes and I always believe one should be given second chances if one were to make things right.
.

In all reality, Jin-Sin
What exactly has Dicker contributed...Think about that statement..If you follow the path of Dicker, you will see his contributions don't even come close to anything the real leaders have done...NOT even close
 
2
•••
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back