Adam, I hope you recover from this - for the sake of your family. But you need to stop this "shill"-ing.
Man, you really made me some Mafia Kingpin! I must simply have to admire your hard work for gathering and using your 'imagiNATION'. At the same time, I highly doubt your mental approach towards a certain situation.
I'll do my best to answer your childish questions and your made-up theories, but I'll do it all
with respect, and with no offense. Hope this will be of your satisfactory.
1-
My Question: How can you claim that I am from Netherlands? Man I can tell you one thing for sure that I am nowhere near Netherlands? But how you came to know about it,
do tell.
2- You said: 2. Adam, your company's name is WebCorp. You seem to like NetXXX and WebXXX names. "WebInvestments" seem to be up your alley. 
My answer: So childish and cute. So you think just because I have an ID with Web in it, it makes me Adam or his ally? Did you happen to notice when my ID was created?
2-
You said: 5. @WebInvestments, you have an impeccable command over English language, in spite of your IP being from Netherlands/Dutch.
My answer: Impeccable command! Come on man, my English is nowhere near that word. In fact, I am sure any native English speaker here can easily find lots and lots of grammatical mistakes in my posts. So nope, I am not impeccable whatever that means (just checked its meaning in Google, so I do know what it means,
now, lol). But I thank you for the compliment.
3. You said: 4. @WebInvestments, you were the first one to launch a full-frontal attack on Shane, soon after he made his post. Exhibit:
My answer: If you haven't bothered to read comments just below my first post here, you'll see few many members who have replied just the way I did, short replies but the intent was similar to my post.
4- You said "Now, what is interesting is, if we ignore the "I don't have any experience" and all such parts, the business model posted seems to be one which Adam likes a lot - using geodomains and building sites!"
My answer: If you haven't noticed in my later posts here, I did mentioned it clearly on several occasions that I admire Adam because I have learned a lot from him. And to be more specific (for you), I have learned concept of developing domains (geo, niche sites etc.) from him. So my friend, if you think that's something to suspect me of being Adam Dicker, then by all means proceed. Again, thanks for your compliment for suspecting me as a legend of the domaining world.
5- You said: 6. @WebInvestments After posting in this thread, you went over and posted in other threads also.
My answer: Well, not sure
why but you have missed few of my previous posts
before this thread was even live. Those posts clearly shows that
this thread wasn't the reason I was here. At least you agree with me (that I started posting on other threads, because that's the reason why I was 'originally' back here, to participate and contribute within a community).
6- You said: 7. @WebInvestments seems to have prescience about what Adam is going to post or think!
My answer: Seriously dude, are you over 16 years? Seriously? Coz your imagination definitely reflects it (no offense). I was
never defending Adam here ever, it was just the way this thread was presented at first. But I know that you are also like few here who have their own way of perceiving things, and that they want to enforce their thoughts on others without facts. So I don't blame you for this.
7- You said: 8. AFTER Adam admitted to being partially wrong, @WebInvestments still keeps posting that Shane is doing this for publicity, and that the whole post is false. Remember, this is after Adam himself posting that some parts of the post are true. And after @WebInvestments himself posted that he agrees with part of the post.
My answer: See above. No further remarks on that.
8- You said: Keep in mind, @WebInvestments is very intelligent as evidenced by his previous posts. But this is not something such a person would post.
My answer: I can only thank you for acknowledging my intelligence. The rest might work for others here to gossip around.
9- You said: 9. Posts #5036293, 5036365, 5037689 and many other posts from @WebInvestments are reputation management ABC
- attacking the attacker, and bringing in multiple points to consider so that people of average intelligence will get confused.
My answer: You don't say, really! And what about my later posts, posts I have made three or four days back? Any comments on that? I highly doubt you'll find any 'rep repair' in those, that is why you seem to have avoided adding those here.
10- You said: 14. @WebInvestments seems to know the exact arrangement which Adam had with his managers. Wow!!
My answer: Now this is the most funniest of them all. This shows that you were too busy observing
juicy points from my posts that you simply missed many other posts which were relevant to my posts. FYI, the Manager part was
originally discussed in Lenny's first post I reckon and later discussed by
@PugDomains if I remember it correctly.
For the ones I have missed, I simply won't answer as I see it hard for you to comprehend.
Lastly, I am not Adam, I am not Rick, I am not a bot. But I sure did liked the way you have tried to
misrepresent me so that I won't participate in this thread. A very nice try though, but the whole thing was just your
personal observation, which you tried to demonstrate using your own way of presentation. In easy English, it was a childish attempt to make me run away from here.
PS: @Shane Bellone, again sorry for posting, but I am literally sick of these false accusations and personal attacks from few wannabees who are so determined to prove me a bot, Adam and now Rick.
