- Impact
- 3,961
....lists their top brandables on another marketplace, you can pretty much say the ship has sailed.
Let me jump in here...
Domain listings on Flippa: We have a great relationship with Flippa, and have been talking to them for over 6 months about how we can work together to increase exposure of the BrandBucket inventory. We are currently running a test -- with only names owned by us since we do not yet have permission from other domain owners -- to see if there's the possibility of a fruitful partnership. We will know after the auctions have run their course. We aren't hiding anything, as the auctions are under our account and most actually mention BrandBucket in the title. Businesses grow through experimentation and innovation, not by maintaining the status quo.
The whole "sinking ship" thing: This is based on two things that I see: 1) The fact that we don't list the names that we sold, and 2) the musings of a competitor, which apparently seem to be rubbing off on a lot of people on this forum.
Our business has always been that the customer comes first, and we WILL NOT compromise the decision we've made to keep our transactions private and out of the search engines since this is a huge concern for many of our customers. What I can share is that we are on track to exceed the $1M mark that we did last year, while maintaining an average sale price of about $2500.
My personal belief is that a business should be built on a great idea, hard work, and positivity. Words live forever on the internet, including negative ones, which is why I try to stay out of forum pettiness. The bottom line is that people choose to do business with people, and I want to be the kind of person that customers and domainers want to do business with in the long run. That's especially important since I and the company I built are supporting many more people than just myself.
I'm sorry, but I have to ask, why would you possibly need to change all of your pages to HTTPS? Of course for purchase pages and logins... but name listings?? And your home page?? Not only will changing your pages to HTTPS likely slow down your website some but you've sacrificed pretty much all of your rankings in Google (how, I don't know)... for something not even Pinterest or even the web-development forum behemoth Stackoverflow does. Just curious I guess.
Actually, it is true.
Last time I spoke to Zane Gocha he said it is not true. I emailed Margot she said it was not true.
Seems like Brand Bucket is doing the same thing that everyone is complaining about Brand Root doing. Type in Namerific and Brand Bucket's ad shows up at the top.
Show attachment 7297
Nobody is complaining about Brandroot doing this, they are complaining about BrandBucket doing it, although we did start a campaign to counter theirs just today. We'll play there game, even though it will likely get very expensive for the both of us.
Hell, claim a TM & go bitch at Google. Make BB remove their buying of your TM or else, Google could take action.
Cheap solution.
Hey guys, my name is Mike and I'm the current owner of Namerific. I was going to post a long reply here, but posted a new thread instead. You can find it here: namepros . com / threads / namerific-com-update.833890/
(Sorry for the spaces in the URL but since I'm using a new account, NamePros won't let me post a link)
Interesting. When I spoke to Zane he said he had sold his interest in the company. I thought for sure he meant to BB. Sorry about that.
Hell, claim a TM & go bitch at Google. Make BB remove their buying of your TM or else, Google could take action.
Cheap solution.
Randy Google does not take action, they usually have to defend these and have won every time.
Is Buying Competitive Keyword Advertising Trademark Infringement?
1-800 Contacts argued that Lens.com created initial interest confusion by buying 1-800 Contacts' trademarks. The Tenth Circuit adopted one of the nation's most favorable definitions of initial interest confusion in its horrible 2006 case Australian Gold v. Hatfield. That case said initial interest confusion “results when a consumer seeks a particular trademark holder’s product and instead is lured to the product of a competitor by the competitor’s use of the same or a similar mark.” If this is just a restatement of bait-and-switch law, fine, but it’s generally believed the Tenth Circuit standard covered more than bait-and-switch. Bait-and-switch requires an initial falsity to bait the hook but the 10th Circuit's standard didn't mention falsity, and there’s no intrinsic falsity in a typical competitive keyword ad buy where the competitor's trademark is used to trigger ad copy.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...-keywords-is-not-trademark-infringement.shtml
Buying Keyword Ads on People's Names Doesn't Violate Their Publicity Rights
Comment Now
Follow Comments
Can you imagine someone buying Google ($GOOG) AdWords keyword advertising triggered by your name? Most of us wouldn’t dream of it, usually because our names just aren’t valuable enough for anyone to bother. In contrast, some professional service providers, such as lawyers and doctors, tout their names in expensive advertising campaigns to consumers—and have competitors who would love to piggyback on that advertising to reach the same consumers. In a novel and persuasive ruling, a Wisconsin appellate court recent rejected a professional service provider’s attempt to use publicity rights to shut down a competitive keyword advertiser.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericgol...-names-doesnt-violate-their-publicity-rights/
Google wins case against Louis Vuitton
The European court of justice today ruled in favour of Google in a long-running court battle with Louis Vuitton over the use of the luxury goods company's trademarked brand names in search advertising.
However, the ECJ added the caveat that companies that use trademarked brand keywords to push sales must be more transparent about who the seller is.
Louis Vuitton, which is part of the LVMH group of brands including Moet & Chandon and Dior, had argued that Google was acting illegally by allowing other companies to bid for and use its brand names as keywords to trigger ads on its website.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2010/mar/23/google-louis-vuitton-search-ads
You are a mindreader as I am writing it right nowThe battle is about to get hotter.
@equity78
I will be expecting 'The Brandable Wars 2' on TLDInvestors.
Yeah, just like Star Wars 2!