Who has the best LLLL.com portfolio?

SpaceshipSpaceship
Watch

clowesy

Established Member
Impact
13
We have an evaluation thread, and a sales report thread, however we do not really know who has what.

I was wondering who everyone thinks has the best portfolio.
Please post details of your LLLL.com portfolio in the form

4 Premiums: xx
Easily Prononcables: xx
3 Premiums: xx
Best LLLL.com:
Comments on why you feel your portfolio is the best: Blah Blah Blah
Comments on the portfolios of others: Blah Blah Blah

This is the info that I feel will best allow us to evaluate the quality of our portfolios. It is all good having 10000 rubbish LLLL.com, but personally Id prefer 100 good names.

Ill post info on my portfolio when I am back (in about 15 mins)

Thanks guys, This should be interesting.
Tom
 
0
•••
The views expressed on this page by users and staff are their own, not those of NamePros.
AfternicAfternic
I have never been good in picking domains with good letters or bad letters. But I just picked some and done. ;)
 
0
•••
How many do you think someone would have to own to be in the top 10??
  • 7,500
  • 10,000
  • 12,500
  • 15,000
 
0
•••
duceman said:
How many do you think someone would have to own to be in the top 10??
  • 7,500
  • 10,000
  • 12,500
  • 15,000

Isn't it not more about Quality then quantity :hehe:
 
0
•••
mellowmasher said:
Isn't it not more about Quality then quantity :hehe:

Have to agree with this when it boils down to money, as everything always does!

1000 poor quality names = $20,000 (High renewal costs, high maintenance)
100 good quality names = $30,000+
10 excellent quality cvcv's = $40,000+ (Low renewal costs, low maintenance)

Rich B-)
 
0
•••
mellowmasher said:
Isn't it not more about Quality then quantity :hehe:

I would asume so as the OP asked who has the best portfolio
 
0
•••
I have 1,000 rubbish LLLLs :(
 
0
•••
1000 is quite a number. I guess that what you call "rubbish" (20$) can t be more then 30% (randomly)
 
0
•••
What he calls rubbish is also a min 200% ROI over the last 3 months :)

How have those rubbish stocks been treating everyone lately? :D

thetruman said:
1000 is quite a number. I guess that what you call "rubbish" (20$) can t be more then 30% (randomly)
 
0
•••
...
 
Last edited:
0
•••
thetruman said:
1000 is quite a number. I guess that what you call "rubbish" (20$) can t be more then 30% (randomly)

To tell the truth, more than 90% of them are really rubbish in the international market, but it's premium for China market. :)

Reece said:
What he calls rubbish is also a min 200% ROI over the last 3 months :)

How have those rubbish stocks been treating everyone lately? :D

Does it mean if I want, I could sold all my 1000 LLLL.coms for at least $20,000 now?
 
0
•••
DotCN said:
To tell the truth, more than 90% of them are really rubbish in the international market, but it's premium for China market. :)
I'll agree with that. China uses many more 'X' and 'Z' in than the U.S, UK. So some of the domians that we may consider garbage are worth $### in the China market
 
0
•••
DotCN said:
I have 1,000 rubbish LLLLs :(

Not sure any can be called rubbish now :hehe: :imho:
 
0
•••
DotCN said:
Does it mean if I want, I could sold all my 1000 LLLL.coms for at least $20,000 now?

Definately - That would be just $20 per name. If you can find the right buyer now, who wants bulk you could easily sell for this.

mellowmasher said:
Not sure any can be called rubbish now :hehe: :imho:

I chose my words carefully! :P - I prefer to call them 'Poorer quality names' becasue I totally agree - none are rubbish looking at current market trend. :)

Rich B-)
 
0
•••
rjs_essex said:
Definately - That would be just $20 per name. If you can find the right buyer now, who wants bulk you could easily sell for this.



I chose my words carefully! :P - I prefer to call them 'Poorer quality names' becasue I totally agree - none are rubbish looking at current market trend. :)

Rich B-)

Thank you.

"Poorer quality name" is really a good name :)
 
0
•••
less interesting LLLL s even better :)
 
0
•••
Keep each LLLL.com discussion to its respective topic.

So far we have:
Adam Dicker
Thomas Zou
Amdo
Me
Pheven
Reece
DotCN

I think a poll can have 10 options, so far we have 7 names. As mentioned in the original thread I value better quality names over quantity because of renewal costs.
I think everyone would agree they would rather have 10 great names than 100 'less interesting' LLLL.com

If we get more than 10 'entrants' I will be using the 10 best (quality wise).

Thanks for the suggestions guys. Do feel free to comment on the folios of others...
 
0
•••
Couple more additions:

Rickkumar - 1500 or so LLLL.coms
Johnnywj - The vacuum. Need more be said?

Adam's the winner hands down imho. As Lorenzo has mentioned -- he has 4000 quad premiums (that we know of... He could have more). I haven't seen anyone's portfolio around here that isn't brought to shame in comparison.

clowesy said:
Keep each LLLL.com discussion to its respective topic.

So far we have:
Adam Dicker
Thomas Zou
Amdo
Me
Pheven
Reece
DotCN

I think a poll can have 10 options, so far we have 7 names. As mentioned in the original thread I value better quality names over quantity because of renewal costs.
I think everyone would agree they would rather have 10 great names than 100 'less interesting' LLLL.com

If we get more than 10 'entrants' I will be using the 10 best (quality wise).

Thanks for the suggestions guys. Do feel free to comment on the folios of others...
 
0
•••
clowesy said:
Keep each LLLL.com discussion to its respective topic.

I think everyone would agree they would rather have 10 great names than 100 'less interesting' LLLL.com

If 100 "less interesting" LLLL.com could be sold for 2,000 USD now and could be sold for 10,000 USD in the next year, while 10 great names could be sold for 2,000 USD now and could be sold for 8,000 USD in the next year, I prefer to 100 "less interesting" LLLL.coms :hehe:
 
1
•••
Really would depend on the names... I think everyone here that has a clue about LLLL.com prices would prefer 1000 triple premiums to 100 quad premiums :)

I know I sure would...

DotCN said:
If 100 "less interesting" LLLL.com could be sold for 2,000 USD now and could be sold for 10,000 USD in the next year, while 10 great names could be sold for 2,000 USD now and could be sold for 8,000 USD in the next year, I prefer to 100 "less interesting" LLLL.coms :hehe:
 
0
•••
Reece said:
Really would depend on the names... I think everyone here that has a clue about LLLL.com prices would prefer 1000 triple premiums to 100 quad premiums :)

I know I sure would...

I'd take 100 quad premium CVCV's over 1000 triple's any day of the week! ;) ;)

Rich B-)
 
0
•••
Appraise.net

We're social

Spaceship
Domain Recover
DomainEasy — Payment Flexibility
  • The sidebar remains visible by scrolling at a speed relative to the page’s height.
Back